IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p613-630.html

The Design of Optimal Pay-as-Bid Procurement Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Je-ok Choi

    (Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford School of Engineering, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Daniela Saban

    (Operations, Information & Technology, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Gabriel Weintraub

    (Operations, Information & Technology, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider the mechanism design problem of finding an optimal pay-as-bid mechanism in which a platform chooses an assortment of suppliers to balance the tradeoff between two objectives: providing enough variety to accommodate heterogeneous buyers, yet at low prices. Academic/practical relevance : Modern buying channels, including e-commerce and public procurement, often consist of a platform that mediates transactions. Frequently, these platforms implement simple and transparent mechanisms to induce suppliers’ direct participation, which typically results in pay-as-bid (or first-price) mechanisms where suppliers set their prices. Methodology : We introduce a novel class of assortment mechanisms that we call k -soft reserves ( k -SRs): If at least k suppliers choose a price below the soft-reserve price, then only those suppliers are added to the assortment; otherwise, all the suppliers are added. Results : We show the optimality of k -SRs for a class of stylized symmetric models to derive the intuition behind these mechanisms. Then, through extensive numerical simulations, we provide evidence of the robustness of k -SRs in more general and realistic settings. Managerial implications : Our results give intuitive and simple-to-use prescriptions on how to optimize pay-as-bid assortment mechanisms in practice, with an emphasis on public procurement settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Je-ok Choi & Daniela Saban & Gabriel Weintraub, 2023. "The Design of Optimal Pay-as-Bid Procurement Mechanisms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 613-630, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:613-630
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1180
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yonatan Gur & Lijian Lu & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2017. "Framework Agreements in Procurement: An Auction Model and Design Recommendations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 586-603, October.
    2. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    3. Pycia, Marek & Woodward, Kyle, 2021. "Auctions of Homogeneous Goods: A Case for Pay-as-Bid," CEPR Discussion Papers 15656, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Elena Katok & Damian R. Beil, 2019. "Split-Award Auctions: Insights from Theory and Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 71-89, January.
    5. Pär Holmberg, 2009. "Supply function equilibria of pay-as-bid auctions," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 154-177, October.
    6. Albano,Gian Luigi & Nicholas,Caroline, 2016. "The Law and Economics of Framework Agreements," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107077966, August.
    7. Daniela Saban & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2021. "Procurement Mechanisms for Assortments of Differentiated Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 795-820, May.
    8. Mohammad Akbarpour & Shengwu Li, 2020. "Credible Auctions: A Trilemma," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 425-467, March.
    9. Michael Dinerstein & Liran Einav & Jonathan Levin & Neel Sundaresan, 2018. "Consumer Price Search and Platform Design in Internet Commerce," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1820-1859, July.
    10. Justus Haucap & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2014. "Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 49-61, February.
    11. Cuihong Li & Laurens G. Debo, 2009. "Second Sourcing vs. Sole Sourcing with Capacity Investment and Asymmetric Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 448-470, July.
    12. Ali Hortaçsu & David McAdams, 2018. "Empirical Work on Auctions of Multiple Objects," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(1), pages 157-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Saban & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2021. "Procurement Mechanisms for Assortments of Differentiated Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 795-820, May.
    2. Marcelo Olivares & Daniela Saban & Gabriel Y. Weintraub & Eduardo Lara & Piero Zanocco & Paula Moreno, 2025. "Saving Millions in Government Procurement Through Data Science and Market Design," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 101-120, March.
    3. Alexander Teytelboym & Shengwu Li & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour & Piotr Dworczak, 2021. "Discovering Auctions: Contributions of Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(3), pages 709-750, July.
    4. Oliver Budzinski & Annika Stöhr, 2019. "Competition policy reform in Europe and Germany – institutional change in the light of digitization," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 15-54, January.
    5. Zhi Chen & Jürgen Mihm & Jochen Schlapp, 2022. "Sourcing Innovation: Integrated System or Individual Components?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 1056-1073, March.
    6. Auyon Siddiq & Christopher S. Tang & Jingwei Zhang, 2022. "Partnerships in Urban Mobility: Incentive Mechanisms for Improving Public Transit Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 956-971, March.
    7. Holmberg, Pär & Newbery, David, 2010. "The supply function equilibrium and its policy implications for wholesale electricity auctions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 209-226, December.
    8. Zhi Chen & Jürgen Mihm & Jochen Schlapp, 2025. "Sourcing Innovation: When to Own and When to Control Your Supplier," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1869-1888, November.
    9. Rigel Galgana & Negin Golrezaei, 2025. "Learning in Repeated Multiunit Pay-as-Bid Auctions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 200-229, January.
    10. Wenchang Zhang & Wedad J. Elmaghraby & Ashish Kabra, 2026. "Marketplace Expansion Through Marquee Seller Adoption: Externalities and Reputation Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1112-1131, February.
    11. Daniele Condorelli & Jorge Padilla & Youngji Sohn, 2024. "Vertical Mergers in Ecosystems with Consumer Hold‐Up," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 909-939, June.
    12. Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz & Ivana Naumovska & Milan Miric, 2023. "Does imitation increase or decrease demand for an original product? Understanding the opposing effects of discovery and substitution," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 639-671, March.
    13. Ignacio Palacios-Huerta & David C. Parkes & Richard Steinberg, 2024. "Combinatorial Auctions in Practice," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 517-553, June.
    14. Wittwer, Milena, 2020. "Interconnected pay-as-bid auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 506-530.
    15. E. Villemeur & Helmuth Cremer & Bernard Roy & Joëlle Toledano, 2007. "Worksharing, access and bypass: the structure of prices in the postal sector," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 67-85, August.
    16. Jianqiang Zhang & Weijun Zhong & Shue Mei, 2012. "Competitive effects of informative advertising in distribution channels," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 561-584, September.
    17. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    19. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    20. Kessing, Sebastian G. & Konrad, Kai A. & Kotsogiannis, Christos, 2006. "Federal tax autonomy and the limits of cooperation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 317-329, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:613-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.