IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i1p341-352.html

Follow the Crowd with Uncertain Service Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Weixin Shang

    (Department of Computing and Decision Sciences, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, New Territories 999077, Hong Kong)

  • Liming Liu

    (School of Business, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

Problem definition : Customer joining behavior is of major concern for service systems where the service capacity is uncertain. Academic/practical relevance : It remains unclear whether customer inference of uncertain service capacity can lead to follow the crowd (FTC) behavior. Management can release capacity information, but how it affects system performance needs to be understood. Methodology : We use a single-server queue to analyze the joining behavior of customers who infer the actual service capacity based on the queue length upon arrival. We also characterize the impact of capacity information disclosure both analytically and numerically. Results : We find that when other customers’ tendency to join the service increases, a tagged customer can make more accurate inferences of service capacity based on queue length. This inference effect arises together with the congestion effect and can lead to FTC when it outweighs the latter. When multiple equilibria exist, we characterize the conditions under which the inference effect is significant at the aggregate customer level so that the joining equilibrium with a larger joining threshold is Pareto-optimal. Managerial implications : Management needs to be careful in setting the information disclosure policy, as the key problem parameters may affect its impact on system throughput and social welfare in opposite directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Yang & Weixin Shang & Liming Liu, 2023. "Follow the Crowd with Uncertain Service Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 341-352, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:341-352
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nimrod Dvir & Refael Hassin & Uri Yechiali, 2020. "Strategic behaviour in a tandem queue with alternating server," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 205-244, December.
    2. Senthil K. Veeraraghavan & Laurens G. Debo, 2011. "Herding in Queues with Waiting Costs: Rationality and Regret," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 329-346, July.
    3. Senthil Veeraraghavan & Laurens Debo, 2009. "Joining Longer Queues: Information Externalities in Queue Choice," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 543-562, April.
    4. Refael Hassin & Moshe Haviv, 1997. "Equilibrium Threshold Strategies: The Case of Queues with Priorities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 966-973, December.
    5. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    6. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    7. Luyi Yang & Zhongbin Wang & Shiliang Cui, 2021. "A Model of Queue Scalping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6803-6821, November.
    8. Hassin, Refael, 1986. "Consumer Information in Markets with Random Product Quality: The Case of Queues and Balking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1185-1195, September.
    9. Ward Whitt, 1999. "Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 192-207, February.
    10. Abhijit V. Banerjee, 1992. "A Simple Model of Herd Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(3), pages 797-817.
    11. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Managing Queueing Systems Where Capacity is Random and Customers are Impatient," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(2), pages 234-250, February.
    12. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    13. Shiliang Cui & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2016. "Blind Queues: The Impact of Consumer Beliefs on Revenues and Congestion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3656-3672, December.
    14. Laurens Debo & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2014. "Equilibrium in Queues Under Unknown Service Times and Service Value," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 38-57, February.
    15. Callander, Steven & Hörner, Johannes, 2009. "The wisdom of the minority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(4), pages 1421-1439.2, July.
    16. Bikhchandani, Sushil & Hirshleifer, David & Welch, Ivo, 1992. "A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change in Informational Cascades," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(5), pages 992-1026, October.
    17. Laurens G. Debo & Christine Parlour & Uday Rajan, 2012. "Signaling Quality via Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 876-891, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1912-1927, May.
    2. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    3. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2023. "Signaling Service Quality Through Queue Disclosure," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 543-562, March.
    4. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    5. Hassin, Refael & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2018. "Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1014-1026.
    6. Laurens G. Debo & Christine Parlour & Uday Rajan, 2012. "Signaling Quality via Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 876-891, May.
    7. Na Zhang & Anand Paul & Xu Sun, 2026. "Managing Service Systems with Overconfident Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 308-325, January.
    8. Luyi Yang & Laurens G. Debo & Varun Gupta, 2019. "Search Among Queues Under Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3605-3623, August.
    9. Ran Snitkovsky & Ricky Roet-Green & Jingwei Ji, 2026. "Foresee the Next Line: Customer Strategies and Information Disclosure in Tandem Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 682-699, March.
    10. Naumov, Sergey & Oliva, Rogelio, 2025. "Structural feedback and behavioral decision making in queuing systems: A hybrid simulation framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 855-870.
    11. Isabel Kaluza & Guido Voigt & Friederike Paetz, 2024. "Empirical studies on the impact of booking status on customers’ choice behavior in online appointment systems," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 187-224, February.
    12. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Queueing systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    13. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    14. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Opaque queues: Service systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    15. Zhongbin Wang & Jinting Wang, 2019. "Information heterogeneity in a retrial queue: throughput and social welfare maximization," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 131-172, June.
    16. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    17. Alessandro Arlotto & Andrew E. Frazelle & Yehua Wei, 2019. "Strategic Open Routing in Service Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 735-750, February.
    18. Isabel Kaluza & Guido Voigt & Knut Haase & Antonia Dietze, 2024. "Control of Online-Appointment Systems When the Booking Status Signals Quality of Service," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 397-432, September.
    19. Cripps, Martin W. & Thomas, Caroline D., 2019. "Strategic experimentation in queues," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(2), May.
    20. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:341-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.