IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i2p543-562.html

Signaling Service Quality Through Queue Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Pengfei Guo

    (College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Moshe Haviv

    (School of Data Science, Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Campus, China; Department of Statistics and Data Science and the Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel)

  • Zhenwei Luo

    (Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

  • Yulan Wang

    (Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Problem definition : We consider a single-server queueing system where service quality is either high or low. The server, who knows its exact quality level, can signal this quality information to customers by revealing or concealing its queue length. Based on this queue disclosure action and the observed queue length in the case of a revealed queue, customers decide whether to join the system. Academic/practical relevance : The queue disclosure action is regarded as a signal indicating the service quality. Methodology : We develop a signaling game and adopt the sequential equilibrium concept to solve it. We further apply the perfect sequential equilibrium as an equilibrium-refinement criterion. Results : In our baseline model, where all of the customers are uninformed of service quality, the pure-strategy perfect sequential equilibrium is always a pooling one, except at several discrete values of market size (measured by the potential arrival rate). When the market size is below a certain threshold, both high- and low-quality servers adopt queue concealment; otherwise, both types of servers adopt queue revelation. We also consider a general scenario in which the market is composed of both quality informed and uninformed customers. Under this setting, when the server conceals the queue, we can fully characterize customers’ equilibrium queueing strategies and the corresponding effective arrival rates. The unique sequential equilibrium outcome is still a pooling one when the market size is either below a lower threshold or above an upper threshold. A separating equilibrium can occur only when the market size falls between two thresholds; under that circumstance, the uninformed customers can infer the server’s quality from its queue disclosure behavior. Managerial implications : Under separating sequential equilibria, uninformed customers can fully infer the quality information and thus behave in an informed way. Unlike studies where queue disclosure is not regarded as a quality signal, our study reveals that the signaling effect of queue disclosure increases (decreases) the effective arrival rate of the high-quality (low-quality) server and also increases the customers’ total utility when the server is of low quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2023. "Signaling Service Quality Through Queue Disclosure," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 543-562, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:543-562
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    2. Senthil K. Veeraraghavan & Laurens G. Debo, 2011. "Herding in Queues with Waiting Costs: Rationality and Regret," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 329-346, July.
    3. Senthil Veeraraghavan & Laurens Debo, 2009. "Joining Longer Queues: Information Externalities in Queue Choice," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 543-562, April.
    4. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    5. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    6. Hassin, Refael, 1986. "Consumer Information in Markets with Random Product Quality: The Case of Queues and Balking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1185-1195, September.
    7. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    8. Ward Whitt, 1999. "Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 192-207, February.
    9. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    10. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Seyed Iravani, 2018. "Managing Customer Expectations and Priorities in Service Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3942-3970, August.
    11. Mirko Kremer & Laurens Debo, 2016. "Inferring Quality from Wait Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 3023-3038, October.
    12. Laurens Debo & Uday Rajan & Senthil K. Veeraraghavan, 2020. "Signaling Quality via Long Lines and Uninformative Prices," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 513-527, May.
    13. Grossman, Sanford J. & Perry, Motty, 1986. "Perfect sequential equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-119, June.
    14. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    15. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1912-1927, May.
    16. Laurens Debo & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2014. "Equilibrium in Queues Under Unknown Service Times and Service Value," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 38-57, February.
    17. Hassin, Refael & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2018. "Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1014-1026.
    18. Pengfei Guo & Refael Hassin, 2011. "Strategic Behavior and Social Optimization in Markovian Vacation Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 986-997, August.
    19. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    20. Mor Armony & Nahum Shimkin & Ward Whitt, 2009. "The Impact of Delay Announcements in Many-Server Queues with Abandonment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 66-81, February.
    21. Laurens G. Debo & Christine Parlour & Uday Rajan, 2012. "Signaling Quality via Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 876-891, May.
    22. Man Yu & Laurens Debo & Roman Kapuscinski, 2016. "Strategic Waiting for Consumer-Generated Quality Information: Dynamic Pricing of New Experience Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 410-435, February.
    23. Kreps, David M & Wilson, Robert, 1982. "Sequential Equilibria," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 863-894, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Donghao & Minner, Stefan & Bichler, Martin, 2025. "Pricing policy and queue-length disclosure in on-demand service platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Georgy Lukyanov & Konstantin Shamruk & Ekaterina Logina, 2025. "Endogenous Quality in Social Learning," Papers 2508.20539, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    3. Lukyanov, Georgy & Shamruk, Konstantin & Logina, Ekaterina, 2025. "Endogenous Quality in Social Learning," TSE Working Papers 25-1680, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1912-1927, May.
    2. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    3. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    4. Ramendra Singh Chauhan & N. Selvaraju, 2025. "Strategic behavior and social optimization in Markovian working vacation queues with delayed observations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-64, June.
    5. Liu Yang & Weixin Shang & Liming Liu, 2023. "Follow the Crowd with Uncertain Service Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 341-352, January.
    6. Ming Hu & Ruslan Momot & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Privacy Management in Service Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2761-2779, September.
    7. Na Zhang & Anand Paul & Xu Sun, 2026. "Managing Service Systems with Overconfident Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 308-325, January.
    8. Zhongbin Wang & Yunan Liu & Lei Fang, 2022. "Pay to activate service in vacation queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2609-2627, June.
    9. Naumov, Sergey & Oliva, Rogelio, 2025. "Structural feedback and behavioral decision making in queuing systems: A hybrid simulation framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 855-870.
    10. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    11. Jianfu Wang & Ming Hu, 2020. "Efficient Inaccuracy: User-Generated Information Sharing in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4648-4666, October.
    12. Hassin, Refael & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2018. "Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1014-1026.
    13. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    14. Luyi Yang & Laurens G. Debo & Varun Gupta, 2019. "Search Among Queues Under Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3605-3623, August.
    15. Jake Clarkson & Konstantin Avrachenkov & Eitan Altman, 2025. "Queues with inspection cost: To see or not to see?," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 1-34, June.
    16. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    17. Ran Snitkovsky & Ricky Roet-Green & Jingwei Ji, 2026. "Foresee the Next Line: Customer Strategies and Information Disclosure in Tandem Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 682-699, March.
    18. Czerny, Achim I. & Guo, Pengfei & Hassin, Refael, 2022. "Shall firms withhold exact waiting time information from their customers? A transport example," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 128-142.
    19. Pengfei Guo & Zhe George Zhang, 2013. "Strategic Queueing Behavior and Its Impact on System Performance in Service Systems with the Congestion-Based Staffing Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 118-131, September.
    20. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2021. "On Queue-Length Information when Customers Travel to a Queue," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 989-1004, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:2:p:543-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.