IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i4p1887-1905.html

Operational Strategies for Distributing Durable Goods in the Base of the Pyramid

Author

Listed:
  • Andre P. Calmon

    (Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Diana Jue-Rajasingh

    (Essmart, Bangalore, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560005, India; Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Gonzalo Romero

    (Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada)

  • Jackie Stenson

    (Essmart, Bangalore, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560005, India; Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Problem definition : Novel life-improving products, such as solar lanterns and energy-efficient cookstoves address essential needs of consumers in the base of the pyramid (BOP). However, their profitable distribution is often difficult because BOP customers are risk-averse, their ability to pay (ATP) is lower than their willingness to pay, and they face uncertainty regarding these products’ value. Academic/practical relevance : We examine two practical strategies from distributors in the BOP: (1) improving the product’s affordability through a discount and (2) increasing awareness of the product’s value. Our results identify BOP-specific operational trade-offs in implementing these strategies. We also propose strategies to manage these trade-offs that can increase consumer surplus in the BOP. Methodology : We introduce a supply chain model for the BOP and analyze the distributor’s pricing problem with refunds as well as the distributor’s optimal budget allocation between strategies (1) and (2). Results : We find that, in the BOP, the distributor’s profit-maximizing budget allocation often yields the lowest consumer surplus. This misalignment between profits and consumer surplus disappears if customers’ ATP is high. Moreover, the misalignment can be resolved if the distributor offers free product returns and commits to a maximum retail price. We confirm the robustness of our results through numerical simulations. Managerial implications : Best operations strategy practices in the BOP can differ significantly from developed markets. Furthermore, BOP customers’ limited ATP and high risk aversion generate a BOP-specific misalignment between profits and consumer surplus. Operational commitments, such as free returns, reduce this misalignment and can serve as a signal to investors of a social enterprise’s focus on consumer surplus.

Suggested Citation

  • Andre P. Calmon & Diana Jue-Rajasingh & Gonzalo Romero & Jackie Stenson, 2022. "Operational Strategies for Distributing Durable Goods in the Base of the Pyramid," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1887-1905, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:1887-1905
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David I Levine & Theresa Beltramo & Garrick Blalock & Carolyn Cotterman & Andrew M Simons, 2018. "What Impedes Efficient Adoption of Products? Evidence from Randomized Sales Offers for Fuel-Efficient Cookstoves in Uganda," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(6), pages 1850-1880.
    2. Jeffery S. McMullen, 2011. "Delineating the Domain of Development Entrepreneurship: A Market–Based Approach to Facilitating Inclusive Economic Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 185-215, January.
    3. Abhijit V. Banerjee, 1997. "A Theory of Misgovernance," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(4), pages 1289-1332.
    4. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 2018. "Socially and Environmentally Responsible Value Chain Innovations: New Operations Management Research Opportunities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 983-996, March.
    5. Xuanming Su, 2009. "Consumer Returns Policies and Supply Chain Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 595-612, March.
    6. Che, Yeon-Koo, 1996. "Customer Return Policies for Experience Goods," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 17-24, March.
    7. Johanna Mair & Ignasi Marti, 2006. "Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight," Post-Print hal-02311880, HAL.
    8. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Optimal Restocking Fees and Information Provision in an Integrated Demand-Supply Model of Product Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 577-594, December.
    9. Leon Yang Chu & Hao Zhang, 2011. "Optimal Preorder Strategy with Endogenous Information Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1055-1077, June.
    10. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.
    11. Jinhong Xie & Steven M. Shugan, 2001. "Electronic Tickets, Smart Cards, and Online Prepayments: When and How to Advance Sell," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 219-243, June.
    12. Terry A. Taylor & Wenqiang Xiao, 2019. "Donor Product‐Subsidies to Increase Consumption: Implications of Consumer Awareness and Profit‐Maximizing Intermediaries," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(7), pages 1757-1772, July.
    13. Plambeck, Erica L. & Taylor, Terry A., 2015. "Supplier Evasion of a Buyer's Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility," Research Papers 3176, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    14. Mair, Johanna & Martí, Ignasi, 2006. "Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 36-44, February.
    15. Lu Huang & Jing-Sheng Song & Robert Swinney, 2022. "Managing Social Responsibility in Multitier Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 2843-2862, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Opher Baron & Gonzalo Romero & Zhuoluo Zhang & Sean X. Zhou, 2024. "Innovative Business Models in Ocean-Bound Plastic Recycling," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 2160-2178, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Gao & Vishal V. Agrawal & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "The Effect of Multichannel and Omnichannel Retailing on Physical Stores," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 809-826, February.
    2. Man Yu & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Roman Kapuscinski, 2015. "Rationing Capacity in Advance Selling to Signal Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 560-577, March.
    3. Yunjuan Kuang & Li Jiang, 2023. "Managing presales with two payments and return policy when consumers are time‐inconsistent," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3594-3613, November.
    4. Yunjeong Kim & Hannah Jun, 2022. "Exploring Technology Innovation Factors, Government Support and Performance of Development-Related Social Enterprises: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Lang, Le Dang & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Hieu, Hoang Ngoc & Ha, Nguyen Minh & Gaur, Jighyasu, 2023. "The role of structural social capital in driving social-oriented sustainable agricultural entrepreneurship," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Zhong, Yuyun & Shen, Wenjing & Ceryan, Oben, 2023. "Information provision under showrooming and webrooming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Robert Swinney, 2011. "Selling to Strategic Consumers When Product Value Is Uncertain: The Value of Matching Supply and Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1737-1751, October.
    8. Çerağ Pinçe & Mark Ferguson & Beril Toktay, 2016. "Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, October.
    9. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Li, Yongjian & Xu, Lei & Li, Dahui, 2013. "Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 451-460.
    11. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Giri K. Tayi, 2015. "Consumer mending and online retailer fit-uncertainty mitigating strategies," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 251-282, September.
    12. Leon Yang Chu & Hao Zhang, 2011. "Optimal Preorder Strategy with Endogenous Information Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1055-1077, June.
    13. Mendoza-Abarca, Karla I. & Anokhin, Sergey & Zamudio, César, 2015. "Uncovering the influence of social venture creation on commercial venture creation: A population ecology perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 793-807.
    14. Kinshuk Jerath & Qitian Ren, 2025. "Consumer Search and Product Returns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 691-710, May.
    15. Zhang, Tao & Li, Gang & Lai, Kin Keung & Leung, John W.K., 2018. "Information disclosure strategies for the intermediary and competitive sellers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1156-1173.
    16. Geradts, Thijs H.J. & Alt, Elisa, 2022. "Social entrepreneurial action in established organizations: Developing the concept of social intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 197-206.
    17. Sahasranamam, Sreevas & Nandakumar, M.K., 2020. "Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-117.
    18. Jill A. Brown & William R. Forster & Andrew C. Wicks, 2023. "The Fork in the Road for Social Enterprises: Leveraging Moral Imagination for Long-Term Stakeholder Support," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 91-112, January.
    19. McMullen, Jeffery S., 2018. "Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 575-590.
    20. Mark Griffiths & Jill Kickul & Sophie Bacq & Siri Terjesen, 2012. "A Dialogue with William J. Baumol: Insights on Entrepreneurship Theory and Education," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 611-625, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:1887-1905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.