IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v31y2012i1p59-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation

Author

Listed:
  • Rik Pieters

    (Marketing Department, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Michel Wedel

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

Abstract

Most ads in practice receive no more than a single eye fixation. This study investigates the limits of what ads can communicate under such adverse exposure conditions. We find that consumers already know at maximum levels of accuracy and with high degree of certainty whether something is an ad or is editorial material after an exposure of less than 100 milliseconds and--if the ad is typical--which product is being advertised. Even after an extremely coarse visual presentation of 100 milliseconds, the product and brand in typical ads are identified well above chance levels, with atypical ads doing slightly better at the brand level. We propose a new metric that quantifies how effectively individual ads communicate their gist in adverse exposure conditions and that predicts the immediate interest that ads draw. Bayesian mediation analyses show that because of their better gist performance, typical ads rather than atypical ones raise immediate interest after very brief exposures. These findings challenge some of the received knowledge in advertising theory and practice, and they reveal the immediate communication benefits of typical ads.

Suggested Citation

  • Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:31:y:2012:i:1:p:59-73
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1110.0673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0673
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.1110.0673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodstein, Ronald C, 1993. "Category-Based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(1), pages 87-99, June.
    2. Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2009. "Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 935-949, 09-10.
    3. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters, 2000. "Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 297-312, October.
    4. Jacob Goldenberg & David Mazursky & Sorin Solomon, 1999. "The Fundamental Templates of Quality Ads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 333-351.
    5. Jacoby, Jacob & Hoyer, Wayne D, 1989. "The Comprehension/Miscomprehension of Print Communication: Selected Findings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(4), pages 434-443, March.
    6. Lahiri, Kajal & Gao, Jian, 2002. "Bayesian analysis of nested logit model by Markov chain Monte Carlo," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 103-133, November.
    7. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    8. Rik Pieters & Luk Warlop & Michel Wedel, 2002. "Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 765-781, June.
    9. Mick, David Glen, 1992. "Levels of Subjective Comprehension in Advertising Processing and Their Relations to Ad Perceptions, Attitudes, and Memory," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(4), pages 411-424, March.
    10. Peter J. Danaher & Janghyuk Lee & Laoucine Kerbache, 2010. "Optimal Internet Media Selection," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 336-347, 03-04.
    11. Ratneshwar, S & Chaiken, Shelly, 1991. "Comprehension's Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 52-62, June.
    12. Robert E. Smith & Scott B. MacKenzie & Xiaojing Yang & Laura M. Buchholz & William K. Darley, 2007. "Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 819-833, 11-12.
    13. Janiszewski, Chris, 1998. "The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(3), pages 290-301, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Uhl & Nadia Abou Nabout & Klaus Miller, 2020. "How Much Ad Viewability is Enough? The Effect of Display Ad Viewability on Advertising Effectiveness," Papers 2008.12132, arXiv.org.
    2. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters, 2015. "The Buffer Effect: The Role of Color When Advertising Exposures Are Brief and Blurred," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 134-143, January.
    3. Thales Teixeira & Rosalind Picard & Rana el Kaliouby, 2014. "Why, When, and How Much to Entertain Consumers in Advertisements? A Web-Based Facial Tracking Field Study," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 809-827, November.
    4. Bitty Balducci & Detelina Marinova, 2018. "Unstructured data in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 557-590, July.
    5. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.
    6. Florack, Arnd & Egger, Martin & Hübner, Ronald, 2020. "When products compete for consumers attention: How selective attention affects preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 117-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Mazhar, 2016. "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 916-932.
    2. Gaetano Miceli & Maria Antonietta Raimondo, 2020. "Creativity in the marketing and consumer behavior literature: a structured review and a research agenda," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 85-124, March.
    3. Jiemiao Chen & Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2016. "The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 334-349, May.
    4. William K. Darley & Jeen-Su Lim, 2023. "Advertising creativity and its effects: a meta-analysis of the moderating role of modality," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 99-111, March.
    5. Myers, Susan D. & Deitz, George D. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Jha, Subhash & Tatara, Jennifer H., 2020. "An eye-tracking study of attention to brand-identifying content and recall of taboo advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 176-186.
    6. Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2009. "Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 935-949, 09-10.
    7. Dass, Mayukh & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Kumar, Piyush & Thomas, Sunil, 2014. "A study of the antecedents of slogan liking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2504-2511.
    8. Chun (Martin) Qiu & Demetrios Vakratsas & Filippo Dall’Olio, 2019. "Advertising Originality Decisions in Competition," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(1), pages 13-25, June.
    9. Georgios Halkias & Flora Kokkinaki, 2010. "Attention, Memory, and Evaluation of Schema Incongruent Brand Messages. An Empirical Study," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 032, University of Siena.
    10. Zuschke, Nick, 2020. "An analysis of process-tracing research on consumer decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 305-320.
    11. Jiemiao Chen & Robert E. Smith, 2018. "The boundaries for ad creativity: effects of type of divergence and brand processing and responses," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 561-576, November.
    12. Huang, Bo & Juaneda, Carolane & Sénécal, Sylvain & Léger, Pierre-Majorique, 2021. "“Now You See Me”: The Attention-Grabbing Effect of Product Similarity and Proximity in Online Shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna & Katsikeas, Constantine S. & Presi, Caterina, 2012. "Print advertising: Type size effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 865-868.
    14. Pieters, Rik & Wedel, Michel, 2020. "Heads up: Head movements during ad exposure respond to consumer goals and predict brand memory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 281-289.
    15. Serhat Peker & Gonca Gokce Menekse Dalveren & Yavuz İnal, 2021. "The Effects of the Content Elements of Online Banner Ads on Visual Attention: Evidence from An-Eye-Tracking Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Braun-LaTour, Kathryn A. & Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Mast, Fred W., 2007. "Mood, information congruency, and overload," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 1109-1116, November.
    17. Alicia L. Rihn & Chengyan Yue, 2016. "Visual Attention's Influence on Consumers’ Willingness‐to‐Pay for Processed Food Products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 314-328, July.
    18. Christophe Bezes, 2010. "Tout ce qui est congruent, est-il similaire ? Propositions de définition du concept de congruence en marketing," Post-Print hal-00573441, HAL.
    19. Tonia Ruppenthal, 2023. "Eye-Tracking Studies on Sustainable Food Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-32, November.
    20. Zuschke, Nick, 2020. "The impact of task complexity and task motivation on in-store marketing effectiveness: An eye tracking analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 337-350.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:31:y:2012:i:1:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.