IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i4p1609-1633.html

Platform Loophole Exploitation, Recovery Measures, and User Engagement: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in Online Gaming

Author

Listed:
  • Jianqing Chen

    (Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080)

  • Shu He

    (Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611)

  • Xue Yang

    (Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

Abstract

Online gaming platforms are inevitably subject to system loopholes such as bugs. Some players may take advantage of these bugs to gain benefits illegitimately, being viewed as rule breakers by platforms. Online platforms face a dilemma between disciplining rule breakers with the risk of being perceived as unfair to the rule breakers—because rule breaches are, after all, caused by the game software’s technical glitches and belong to a “gray area”—and not disciplining rule breakers with the risk of being perceived as unfair to the observers. Different recovery measures may result in significantly different economic impacts. In this study, we use the unique field data of an online gaming platform to examine the effects of players’ rule-breach behavior due to system bugs and the platform’s different recovery measures on players’ subsequent engagement. Using various empirical models, we find that the occurrence of bugs negatively impacts the observing players’ in-game online duration and consumption. Surprisingly, although the platform is responsible for the bugs, not punishing rule breakers leads to even larger reductions in observing players’ platform engagement than punishing them. We thus suggest that the primary driver of the engagement reduction is the platform’s inappropriate recovery measure, rather than the bugs, and call online platforms’ attention to designing effective rules and recovery measures under the situation of a rule breach. Our findings enrich the literature and theories concerning the relationships between online platform loophole exploitation, associated recovery measures, and sustained user engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianqing Chen & Shu He & Xue Yang, 2024. "Platform Loophole Exploitation, Recovery Measures, and User Engagement: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in Online Gaming," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1609-1633, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1609-1633
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2020.0416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0416
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2020.0416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Huang & Stefanus Jasin & Puneet Manchanda, 2019. "“Level Up”: Leveraging Skill and Engagement to Maximize Player Game-Play in Online Video Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 927-947, September.
    2. Thomas L. Huber & Thomas Kude & Jens Dibbern, 2017. "Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 563-584, September.
    3. Shu He & Jing Peng & Jianbin Li & Liping Xu, 2020. "Impact of Platform Owner’s Entry on Third-Party Stores," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1467-1484, December.
    4. Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Philip Mayrhofer, 2013. "The Effects of Rewarding User Engagement: The Case of Facebook Apps," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 186-200, March.
    5. Mochen Yang & Yuqing Ren & Gediminas Adomavicius, 2019. "Understanding User-Generated Content and Customer Engagement on Facebook Business Pages," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 839-855, September.
    6. Ji Wu & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & J. Leon Zhao, 2021. "FairPlay: Detecting and Deterring Online Customer Misbehavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1323-1346, December.
    7. Rishika Rishika & Jui Ramaprasad, 2019. "The Effects of Asymmetric Social Ties, Structural Embeddedness, and Tie Strength on Online Content Contribution Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3398-3422, July.
    8. Tax, Stephen S. & Kim, Young “Sally” & Nair, Sudhir, 2013. "Getting the right payoff from customer penalty fees," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 377-386.
    9. Yuchen Zhang & Jingjing Li & Tony W. Tong, 2022. "Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 599-626, March.
    10. David H. Autor, 2003. "Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-42, January.
    11. Ernst Fehr & Simon Gächter, 2002. "Altruistic punishment in humans," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 137-140, January.
    12. Hamari, Juho & Keronen, Lauri, 2017. "Why do people play games? A meta-analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 125-141.
    13. Leo Katz, 2010. "A Theory of Loopholes," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(1), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    2. Fan Zou & Yan Dong & Kejia Hu & Sriram Venkataraman, 2025. "Delegation with Technology Migration: An Empirical Analysis of Mobile Virtual Network Operators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7244-7262, September.
    3. Tobias Kretschmer & Aija Leiponen & Melissa Schilling & Gurneeta Vasudeva, 2022. "Platform ecosystems as meta‐organizations: Implications for platform strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 405-424, March.
    4. Jens Foerderer, 2020. "Interfirm Exchange and Innovation in Platform Ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4772-4787, October.
    5. Michael R. Ward, 2022. "Network engagement from learning friends’ preferences: evidence from a video gaming social network," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1239-1255, September.
    6. Christian Peukert & Imke Reimers, 2022. "Digitization, Prediction, and Market Efficiency: Evidence from Book Publishing Deals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6907-6924, September.
    7. Martin Engert & Julia Evers & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "The Engagement of Complementors and the Role of Platform Boundary Resources in e-Commerce Platform Ecosystems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2007-2025, December.
    8. Le Wang & Paul Benjamin Lowry & Xin (Robert) Luo & Han Li, 2023. "Moving Consumers from Free to Fee in Platform-Based Markets: An Empirical Study of Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Games," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 275-296, March.
    9. Michiel Van Crombrugge & Stefan Stremersch, 2025. "Engagement in platform markets: A (video) game changer?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 1422-1446, September.
    10. Dai, Guangsong & Zhang, Lanxia & Zhang, Qingqiang & Mao, Mengyu, 2024. "Navigating tensions between value creation and capture in ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Anil R. Doshi & William Schmidt, 2024. "Soft Governance Across Digital Platforms Using Transparency," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 185-204, June.
    12. Wesley W. Koo & Charles E. Eesley, 2021. "Platform governance and the rural–urban divide: Sellers' responses to design change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 941-967, May.
    13. Jan Frederic Nerbel & Markus Kreutzer, 2023. "Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Jacobides, Michael G. & Cennamo, Carmelo & Gawer, Annabelle, 2024. "Externalities and complementarities in platforms and ecosystems: From structural solutions to endogenous failures," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    15. Jason Chan & Shu He & Dandan Qiao & Andrew Whinston, 2024. "Shedding Light on the Dark: The Impact of Legal Enforcement on Darknet Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 145-164, March.
    16. Yoseph, Nir Shlomo, 2018. "The Impact of Environmental Fraud on the Used Car Market: Evidence from Dieselgate," CEPR Discussion Papers 12899, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Yaxuan Ran & Jiani Liu & Yishi Zhang, 2023. "Integrating Users’ Contextual Engagements with Their General Preferences: An Interpretable Followee Recommendation Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 614-632, May.
    18. Checchi, Daniele & Visser, Jelle & van de Werfhorst, Herman G., 2007. "Inequality and Union Membership: The Impact of Relative Earnings Position and Inequality Attitudes," IZA Discussion Papers 2691, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. John S. Heywood & W.S. Siebert & Xiangdong Wei, 2011. "Estimating the Use of Agency Workers: Can Family-Friendly Practices Reduce Their Use?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 535-564, July.
    20. Carlo Borzaga & Ermanno Tortia, 2004. "Worker involvement in entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations. Toward a new assessment of workers' perceived satisfaction and fairness," Department of Economics Working Papers 0409, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1609-1633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.