IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v33y2022i3p824-845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Asymmetry Among Investors and Strategic Bidding in Peer-to-Peer Lending

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Lu

    (International Institute of Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China)

  • Zaiyan Wei

    (Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907)

  • Tat Y. Chan

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

We study how investors in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending use their information advantages in decisions on when to place bids. Literature documents that better-informed bidders may withhold bidding until the last moment (i.e., “sniping”) to avoid competition. We argue that, because a collective effort from investors is required in P2P lending, it could be optimal for informed investors to bid early in projects with a low probability of being funded with the purpose of signaling the quality of these projects. With a unique data set from Prosper.com, we use a matching analysis to show that, for projects with low credit grades, the probability of being successfully funded is positively correlated with early bids from informed investors. For funded loans, informed investors are more likely to bid in the early stage than uninformed investors, whereas uninformed investors will follow and bid at the late stage. Finally, there are more early bids from informed investors for “good” loans than for “bad” loans, indicating that the bids are informative for the quality of those projects. Our findings have important implications for managing the information asymmetry and strategic behaviors among investors on P2P lending platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Lu & Zaiyan Wei & Tat Y. Chan, 2022. "Information Asymmetry Among Investors and Strategic Bidding in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 824-845, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:824-845
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.1084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2021.1084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Juan Feng, 2011. "Cyclical Bid Adjustments in Search-Engine Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1703-1719, February.
    2. Thomas Hildebrand & Manju Puri & Jörg Rocholl, 2017. "Adverse Incentives in Crowdfunding," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 587-608, March.
    3. Rajkamal Iyer & Asim Ijaz Khwaja & Erzo F. P. Luttmer & Kelly Shue, 2016. "Screening Peers Softly: Inferring the Quality of Small Borrowers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1554-1577, June.
    4. De Liu & Jianqing Chen & Andrew B. Whinston, 2010. "Ex Ante Information and the Design of Keyword Auctions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 133-153, March.
    5. Ravi Bapna & Paulo Goes & Alok Gupta, 2003. "Analysis and Design of Business-to-Consumer Online Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 85-101, January.
    6. Uri Simonsohn & Dan Ariely, 2008. "When Rational Sellers Face Nonrational Buyers: Evidence from Herding on eBay," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1624-1637, September.
    7. Jeffrey C. Ely & Tanjim Hossain, 2009. "Sniping and Squatting in Auction Markets," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 68-94, August.
    8. Zaiyan Wei & Mingfeng Lin, 2017. "Market Mechanisms in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4236-4257, December.
    9. Freedman, Seth & Jin, Ginger Zhe, 2017. "The information value of online social networks: Lessons from peer-to-peer lending," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 185-222.
    10. Alvin E. Roth & Axel Ockenfels, 2002. "Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(4), pages 1093-1103, September.
    11. Yang Jiang & Yi-Chun (Chad) Ho & Xiangbin Yan & Yong Tan, 2020. "When Online Lending Meets Real Estate: Examining Investment Decisions in Lending-Based Real Estate Crowdfunding," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 715-730, September.
    12. Mingfeng Lin & Siva Viswanathan, 2016. "Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1393-1414, May.
    13. Ockenfels, Axel & Roth, Alvin E., 2006. "Late and multiple bidding in second price Internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 297-320, May.
    14. Xiaomeng Du & Meng Su & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Xiaona Zheng, 2017. "Bidding for Multiple Keywords in Sponsored Search Advertising: Keyword Categories and Match Types," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 711-722, December.
    15. Adair Morse, 2015. "Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding: Information and the Potential for Disruption in Consumer Lending," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 463-482, December.
    16. Devin G. Pope & Justin R. Sydnor, 2011. "What’s in a Picture?: Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper.com," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 46(1), pages 53-92.
    17. Shengsheng Xiao & Yi‐Chun (Chad) Ho & Hai Che, 2021. "Building the Momentum: Information Disclosure and Herding in Online Crowdfunding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3213-3230, September.
    18. John R. Nofsinger & Richard W. Sias, 1999. "Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(6), pages 2263-2295, December.
    19. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    20. Chen, Ning & Ghosh, Arpita & Lambert, Nicolas S., 2014. "Auctions for social lending: A theoretical analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 367-391.
    21. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    22. Kei Kawai & Ken Onishi & Kosuke Uetake, 2021. "Signaling in Online Credit Markets," NBER Working Papers 29268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    23. Adair Morse, 2015. "Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding: Information and the Potential for Disruption in Consumer Lending," NBER Working Papers 20899, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    24. Juanjuan Zhang & Peng Liu, 2012. "Rational Herding in Microloan Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 892-912, May.
    25. Amy Greenwald & Karthik Kannan & Ramayya Krishnan, 2010. "On Evaluating Information Revelation Policies in Procurement Auctions: A Markov Decision Process Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 15-36, March.
    26. Jefferson Duarte & Stephan Siegel & Lance Young, 2012. "Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(8), pages 2455-2484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jianwen, 2023. "MSMEs meet FinTech: Chance or challenge?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Xu, Yang & Zhou, Qiang & Wang, Xu, 2023. "Joint price and quality optimization strategy in crowdfunding campaign," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongchang Wang & Eric M. Overby, 2022. "How Does Online Lending Influence Bankruptcy Filings?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3309-3329, May.
    2. Belleflamme, Paul & Omrani, Nessrine & Peitz, Martin, 2015. "The economics of crowdfunding platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 11-28.
    3. Sunghun Chung & Keongtae Kim & Chul Ho Lee & Wonseok Oh, 2023. "Interdependence between online peer‐to‐peer lending and cryptocurrency markets and its effects on financial inclusion," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1939-1957, June.
    4. Carla Martínez-Climent & Ana Zorio-Grima & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2018. "Financial return crowdfunding: literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 527-553, September.
    5. Bertsch, Christoph & Hull, Isaiah & Qi, Yingjie & Zhang, Xin, 2020. "Bank misconduct and online lending," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Maggie Rong Hu & Xiaoyang Li & Yang Shi & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2023. "Numerological Heuristics and Credit Risk in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1744-1760, December.
    7. Hongchang Wang & Eric Overby, 2023. "Do Political Differences Inhibit Market Transactions? An Investigation in the Context of Online Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4685-4706, August.
    8. Serena Gallo, 2021. "Fintech platforms: Lax or careful borrowers’ screening?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, December.
    9. Qun Chen & Ji-Wen Li & Jian-Guo Liu & Jing-Ti Han & Yun Shi & Xun-Hua Guo, 2021. "Borrower Learning Effects: Do Prior Experiences Promote Continuous Successes in Peer-to-Peer Lending?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 963-986, August.
    10. Mohammed Alyakoob & Mohammad S. Rahman & Zaiyan Wei, 2021. "Where You Live Matters: Local Bank Competition, Online Marketplace Lending, and Disparity in Borrower Benefits," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1390-1411, December.
    11. Tetyana Balyuk, 2023. "FinTech Lending and Bank Credit Access for Consumers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 555-575, January.
    12. Jiaying Deng & Hossein Ghasemkhani & Yong Tan & Arvind K Tripathi, 2023. "Actions speak louder than words: Imputing users’ reputation from transaction history," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1096-1111, April.
    13. Gorkem Turgut Ozer & Brad N. Greenwood & Anandasivam Gopal, 2023. "Digital Multisided Platforms and Women’s Health: An Empirical Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Lending and Abortion Rates," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 223-252, March.
    14. Li, Jianwen & Zhang, Bo & Jiang, Mingming & Hu, Jinyan, 2023. "Homophilous intensity in the online lending market: Bidding behavior and economic effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Inessa Liskovich & Maya Shaton, 2017. "Borrowers in Search of Feedback : Evidence from Consumer Credit Markets," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-049, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    16. Bollaert, Helen & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Schwienbacher, Armin, 2021. "Fintech and access to finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Runshan Fu & Yan Huang & Param Vir Singh, 2020. "Crowd, Lending, Machine, and Bias," Papers 2008.04068, arXiv.org.
    18. Chen, Xiao & Huang, Bihong & Shaban, Mohamed, 2022. "Naïve or sophisticated? Information disclosure and investment decisions in peer to peer lending," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Qun Chen & Ji-Wen Li & Jian-Guo Liu & Jing-Ti Han & Yun Shi & Xun-Hua Guo, 0. "Borrower Learning Effects: Do Prior Experiences Promote Continuous Successes in Peer-to-Peer Lending?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    20. Peng, Hongfeng & Ji, Jiao & Sun, Hanwen & Xu, Haofeng, 2023. "Legal enforcement and fintech credit: International evidence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 214-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:824-845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.