IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v13y2002i3p239-254.html

Businesses as Buildings: Metrics for the Architectural Quality of Internet Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Jinwoo Kim

    (Internet Business Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea)

  • Jungwon Lee

    (Internet Business Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea)

  • Kwanghee Han

    (Internet Business Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea)

  • Moonkyu Lee

    (Internet Business Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749, South Korea)

Abstract

Metrics for the architectural quality of Internet businesses are essential in gauging the success and failure of e-commerce. This study proposes six dimensions of architectural metrics for Internet businesses: internal stability, external security, information gathering, order processing, system interface , and communication interface . The metrics are based on the three constructs that have been used to evaluate buildings in the real world. The structural construct indicates that Internet businesses need to be stable internally and secure externally. The functional construct implies that Internet businesses should provide convenient functions in the information-gathering and order-processing phases. Finally, the representational construct indicates that they need to provide a pleasant interface both to the systemand to those using it. For each of the six metrics, we have constructed questionnaires to measure the perceived level of architectural quality and identified feature lists that may be closely related to the perceived quality level. Large-scale empirical studies were conducted both to validate the proposed metrics and to explore their relevance across four Internet business domains. The validity of the metrics has been obtained in three ways. First, the content validity of the metrics was assured by pretests and pilot survey. Second, the results from the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the metrics had high convergent and discriminant validities. Finally, the reliability coefficients were found to be high enough to establish the reliability of the proposed metrics. The relevance of the metrics has been explored in two ways. Structural equation models were used to test the causal relations between the three constructs and user satisfaction, as well as customer loyalty, in four domains. Correlation analyses were used to explore the relations between the perceived architectural quality and objective design features in four domains. This paper ends with the implications and limitations of the study results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinwoo Kim & Jungwon Lee & Kwanghee Han & Moonkyu Lee, 2002. "Businesses as Buildings: Metrics for the Architectural Quality of Internet Businesses," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 239-254, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:239-254
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.13.3.239.79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.239.79
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.13.3.239.79?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter B. Seddon, 1997. "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 240-253, September.
    2. Sullivan, Jeremiah, 1999. "What are the functions of corporate home pages?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 193-210, July.
    3. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    4. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amar Raju G. & Souvik Roy & Santanu Mandal, 2018. "Determinants of Website Usability: Empirical Evidence from Tourism Sector in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1640-1662, December.
    2. Udo, Godwin J. & Bagchi, Kallol K. & Kirs, Peeter J., 2010. "An assessment of customers’ e-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 481-492.
    3. Dennis Ahrholdt & Goetz Greve & Gregor Hopf, 2019. "Online-Marketing-Intelligence," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-658-26562-5, December.
    4. Longstreet, Phil & Valacich, Joseph & Wells, John, 2021. "Towards an understanding of online visual aesthetics: An instantiation of the composition perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. D. Veena Parboteeah & Joseph S. Valacich & John D. Wells, 2009. "The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer's Urge to Buy Impulsively," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 60-78, March.
    6. Manuel Trenz & Jan Huntgeburth & Daniel Veit, 2019. "How to Succeed with Cloud Services?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(2), pages 181-194, April.
    7. V.V. Devi Prasad Kotni, 2017. "Paradigm Shift from Attracting Footfalls for Retail Store to Getting Hits for E-stores: An Evaluation of Decision-making Attributes in E-tailing," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(5), pages 1215-1237, October.
    8. Mei Xue & Patrick T. Harker & Gregory R. Heim, 2003. "Incorporating the Dual Customer Roles in e-Service Design," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 03-04, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    9. Heinze, Nathan & Hu, Qing, 2006. "The evolution of corporate web presence: A longitudinal study of large American companies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 313-325.
    10. Min Jung Kang & Yong Cheol Hwang, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Affecting the Continued Usage Intention of IoT-Based Healthcare Wearable Devices Using the TAM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    11. Nan, Dongyan & Lee, Haein & Kim, Yerin & Kim, Jang Hyun, 2022. "My video game console is so cool! A coolness theory-based model for intention to use video game consoles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Abeeha Batool & Schehar Bano & Dr. Muhamamd Aslam Khan & M. Naveed Akhtar & Almana Naeem & Bariha Batool, 2011. "Technology as a Black-box in E-business and its impact on Customer Satisfaction: Major Corporate Sector of Islamabad Areas, Pakistan," Far East Journal of Marketing and Management, Far East Research Centre, vol. 1(4), pages 28-53, December.
    13. Detmar W. Straub & Donna L. Hoffman & Bruce W. Weber & Charles Steinfield, 2002. "Toward New Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 227-238, September.
    14. Sriram Thirumalai & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2013. "To Personalize or Not to Personalize Online Purchase Interactions: Implications of Self-Selection by Retailers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 683-708, September.
    15. Dennis Ahrholdt & Goetz Greve & Gregor Hopf, 2023. "Website- und Webshop-Marketing," Springer Books, in: Online-Marketing-Intelligence, edition 2, chapter 15, pages 409-463, Springer.
    16. Finn, Adam & Wang, Luming & Frank, Tema, 2009. "Attribute Perceptions, Customer Satisfaction and Intention to Recommend E-Services," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 209-220.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    2. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Féniès, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    3. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    4. Iannacci, Federico & Cornford, Tony, 2017. "Unravelling casual and temporal influences underpinning monitoring systems success: a typological approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84049, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Landrum, Hollis & Prybutok, Victor R., 2004. "A service quality and success model for the information service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 628-642, August.
    6. Lee, Sang-Yong Tom & Kim, Hee-Woong & Gupta, Sumeet, 2009. "Measuring open source software success," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 426-438, April.
    7. Liao, Chechen & Palvia, Prashant & Lin, Hong-Nan, 2006. "The roles of habit and web site quality in e-commerce," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 469-483.
    8. Vu Thi Thanh Binh & Nhat-Minh Tran & Manh-Chien Vu, 2022. "The Effect of Organizational Culture on the Quality of Accounting Information Systems: Evidence From Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8263 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yi-Shun Wang & Shin-jeng Lin & Ci-Rong Li & Timmy H. Tseng & Hsien-Ta Li & Jia-Yang Lee, 2018. "Developing and validating a physical product e-tailing systems success model," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 245-257, December.
    11. YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou & Nilesh Saraf, 2020. "Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1376-1397, December.
    12. Andrew Burton-Jones & Camille Grange, 2013. "From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 632-658, September.
    13. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Brown, Susan A. & Venkatesh, Viswanath & Kuruzovich, Jason & Massey, Anne P., 2008. "Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 52-66, January.
    15. Nurlia Dewi & Willy Abdillah & Muhartini Salim & Slamet Widodo, 2021. "The Role of Leadership in Implementation Public Information System of Local Government Institutions in Indonesia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 1-9.
    16. A. Maes & G. Poels, 2006. "Development of a user evaluations based quality model for conceptual modeling," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/406, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Bradley, Joseph, 2008. "Management based critical success factors in the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 175-200.
    18. Mi, Hwang, 1998. "Did Task Type Matter in the Use of Decision Room GSS? A Critical Review and a Meta-analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Gjoko Stamenkov, 2023. "Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2923-2946, June.
    20. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    21. Xixi Li & J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai, 2013. "Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 659-682, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:239-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.