IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ordeca/v23y2026i2p114-128.html

Asymptotic Fractional Degree Stochastic Dominance for Lognormal Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Jiehua Xie

    (School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, P.R. China)

  • Wei Zou

    (School of Science, Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, P.R. China)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a continuum of asymptotic stochastic dominance criteria as a novel rule for comparing and ranking prospects in long term decision-making contexts. The new criteria encompass the established asymptotic first-degree and second-degree stochastic dominance criteria, and between the two integer degrees, they effectively characterize the preferences of decision makers who are predominantly risk averse but do not categorically dislike all forms of risk, that is, those whose utility functions exhibit local convexities. To this end, we first introduce the concept of asymptotic fractional degree stochastic dominance, and then derive its equivalent conditions under the assumption of lognormal distributions. Furthermore, to enhance the tractability of asymptotic fractional degree stochastic dominance, under an additional condition on decision makers’ utility functions that marginal utilities are finite, we introduce a variant of asymptotic fractional degree stochastic dominance, referred to as operational asymptotic fractional degree stochastic dominance, and derive its corresponding equivalent distributional characterizations. The (operational) asymptotic fractional degree stochastic dominance offers a more comprehensive criterion for ranking prospects in long term decision-making contexts. This study elucidates how various constraints on marginal utilities of decision makers shape the equivalent distributional conditions of asymptotic stochastic dominance criteria. Empirical examples also illustrate that the newly proposed (operational) asymptotic fractional degree can be effectively utilized in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiehua Xie & Wei Zou, 2026. "Asymptotic Fractional Degree Stochastic Dominance for Lognormal Prospects," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 114-128, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:114-128
    DOI: 10.1287/deca.2025.0466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2025.0466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/deca.2025.0466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Bell, 1982. "Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 961-981, October.
    2. Cillo, Alessandra & Delquié, Philippe, 2014. "Mean-risk analysis with enhanced behavioral content," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 764-775.
    3. Peter P. Wakker & Sylvia J. T. Jansen & Anne M. Stiggelbout, 2004. "Anchor Levels as a New Tool for the Theory and Measurement of Multiattribute Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 217-234, December.
    4. David Chambers & Elroy Dimson & Antti Ilmanen & Paul Rintamäki, 2024. "Long-Run Asset Returns," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 435-458, November.
    5. Goodman, Lucas & Mukherjee, Anita & Ramnath, Shanthi, 2023. "Set it and forget it? Financing retirement in an age of defaults," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 47-68.
    6. Eduardo Schwartz & James E. Smith, 2000. "Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 893-911, July.
    7. Jonathan A. Parker & Antoinette Schoar & Allison Cole & Duncan Simester, 2025. "Household Portfolios and Retirement Saving over the Life Cycle," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(5), pages 2739-2787, October.
    8. Haim Levy, 2025. "The maximum geometric mean criterion: revisiting the Markowitz–Samuelson debate: survey and analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 263-284, March.
    9. Haim Levy, 2020. "Aging Population, Retirement, and Risk Taking: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2796-2799, June.
    10. repec:eme:mfppss:mf-01-2016-0007 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Larry Y. Tzeng & Rachel J. Huang & Pai-Ta Shih, 2013. "Revisiting Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1250-1254, May.
    12. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini & Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler, 2025. "Multivariate Almost Stochastic Dominance: Transfer Characterizations and Sufficient Conditions Under Dependence Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 879-893, March.
    13. Chunling Luo & Chin Hon Tan, 2020. "Almost Stochastic Dominance for Most Risk-Averse Decision Makers," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 169-184, June.
    14. Levy, Moshe, 2022. "An inter-temporal CAPM based on First order Stochastic Dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 734-739.
    15. Wenhao Zhu & Lujun Li & Jingping Yang & Jiehua Xie & Liulei Sun, 2023. "Asymptotic subadditivity/superadditivity of Value‐at‐Risk under tail dependence," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1314-1369, October.
    16. Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler & Rachel J. Huang & Larry Y. Tzeng, 2015. "Generalized Almost Stochastic Dominance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 363-377, April.
    17. Pavlo R. Blavatskyy, 2010. "Modifying the Mean-Variance Approach to Avoid Violations of Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 2050-2057, November.
    18. Milton Friedman & L. J. Savage, 1948. "The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 279-279.
    19. Levy, Haim, 1973. "Stochastic Dominance Among Log-Normal Prospects," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 14(3), pages 601-614, October.
    20. Chin Hon Tan & Chunling Luo, 2017. "Clear Preferences Under Partial Distribution Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 65-73, March.
    21. Mao, Tiantian & Wang, Ruodu, 2022. "Fractional stochastic dominance in rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    22. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    23. Jiehua Xie & Zhengyong Zhou, 2022. "Patchwork Constructions of Multiattribute Utility Functions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 141-169, June.
    24. David E. Bell, 1985. "Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-27, February.
    25. James E. Smith, 2004. "Risk Sharing, Fiduciary Duty, and Corporate Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127, June.
    26. James M. Poterba, 2014. "Retirement Security in an Aging Population," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 1-30, May.
    27. Anil Gaba & Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler, 2004. "Modifying Variability and Correlations in Winner-Take-All Contests," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 384-395, June.
    28. Bruno Jullien & Bernard Salanie, 2000. "Estimating Preferences under Risk: The Case of Racetrack Bettors," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(3), pages 503-530, June.
    29. Gordon B. Dahl & Claus Thustrup Kreiner & Torben Heien Nielsen & Benjamin Ly Serena, 2024. "Understanding the Rise in Life Expectancy Inequality," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(2), pages 566-575, March.
    30. Mark Schneider & Robert Day, 2018. "Target-Adjusted Utility Functions and Expected-Utility Paradoxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 271-287, January.
    31. Botond Koszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2007. "Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1047-1073, September.
    32. Friedman, Daniel, 1989. "The S-Shaped Value Function as a Constrained Optimum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 1243-1248, December.
    33. Cameron Ellis & Thorsten Moenig & Jacqueline Volkman‐Wise, 2025. "Registered index‐linked annuities in qualified retirement plans," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 92(3), pages 665-691, September.
    34. Haim Levy, 2016. "Aging Population, Retirement, and Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1415-1430, May.
    35. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini & Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler, 2017. "Between First- and Second-Order Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2933-2947, September.
    36. Liu, Liqun & Meyer, Jack, 2025. "Almost stochastic dominance: Magnitude constraints on risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 82-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini & Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler, 2017. "Between First- and Second-Order Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2933-2947, September.
    2. Jianping Yang & Chaoqun Zhao & Weiru Chen & Diwei Zhou & Shuguang Han, 2022. "Fraction-Degree Reference Dependent Stochastic Dominance," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1193-1219, June.
    3. Liu, Liqun & Meyer, Jack, 2025. "Almost stochastic dominance: Magnitude constraints on risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 82-90.
    4. Christian Laudag'e & Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, 2025. "When risk defies order: On the limits of fractional stochastic dominance," Papers 2509.24747, arXiv.org.
    5. Mark Schneider & Robert Day, 2018. "Target-Adjusted Utility Functions and Expected-Utility Paradoxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 271-287, January.
    6. Bi, Hongwei & Zhu, Wei, 2022. "Nonmonotonic risk preferences over lottery comparison," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1458-1468.
    7. Araujo, A. & Gama, J. & Suarez, C.E., 2022. "Lack of prevalence of the endowment effect: An equilibrium analysis," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    9. Chunling Luo & Piao Chen & Patrick Jaillet, 2025. "Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 7029-7055, August.
    10. Ivan Barreda-Tarrazona & Ainhoa Jaramillo-Gutierrez & Daniel Navarro-Martinez & Gerardo Sabater-Grande, 2014. "The role of forgone opportunities in decision making under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 167-188, October.
    11. Matthew D. Rablen, 2023. "Loss Aversion, Risk Aversion, and the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function," Working Papers 2023013, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    12. Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Vitalie Spinu, 2020. "Searching for the Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 93-112, January.
    13. Rablen, Matthew D., 2019. "Foundations of the Rank-Dependent Probability Weighting Function," IZA Discussion Papers 12701, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Alessandra Cillo & Marco Bonetti & Giovanni Burro & Clelia Di Serio & Roberta De Filippis & Riccardo Maria Martoni, 2019. "Neurocognitive assessment in obsessive compulsive disorder patients: Adherence to behavioral decision models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini & Ilia Tsetlin & Robert L. Winkler, 2025. "Multivariate Almost Stochastic Dominance: Transfer Characterizations and Sufficient Conditions Under Dependence Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 879-893, March.
    16. Xi Zhi Lim, 2021. "Ordered Reference Dependent Choice," Papers 2105.12915, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    17. Pavlo Blavatskyy, 2018. "A second-generation disappointment aversion theory of decision making under risk," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 29-60, January.
    18. Georgalos, Konstantinos & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David, 2024. "The Kőszegi–Rabin expectations-based model and risk-apportionment tasks for elicitation of higher order risk preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 749-770.
    19. Charles-Cadogan, G., 2018. "Losses loom larger than gains and reference dependent preferences in Bernoulli’s utility function," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 220-237.
    20. Mark Schneider, 2019. "A Bias Aggregation Theorem," Working Papers 19-03, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:23:y:2026:i:2:p:114-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.