IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijm/journl/v17y2024i2p182-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits of Policymaking - An analysis of the consequences of boundedly rational government using the Swedish Micro-to-Macro model (MOSES)

Author

Listed:
  • Gunnar Eliasson

    (Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI), Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Erol Taymaz

    (Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunnar Eliasson & Erol Taymaz, 2024. "The limits of Policymaking - An analysis of the consequences of boundedly rational government using the Swedish Micro-to-Macro model (MOSES)," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 17(2), pages 182-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:182-201
    DOI: 10.34196/ijm.00295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.34196/ijm.00295
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34196/ijm.00295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1977. "Competition and Market Processes in a Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(1), pages 277-281, February.
    2. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1991. "Modeling the experimentally organized economy : Complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 153-182, July.
    3. repec:bla:scandj:v:92:y:1990:i:4:p:531-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1988. "The Firm as a Competent Team," Working Paper Series 207, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Feb 1990.
    5. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1990. "The firm as a competent team," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 275-298, June.
    6. Lucas, Robert Jr, 1976. "Econometric policy evaluation: A critique," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 19-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1994. "The Macroeconomic Effects of New Information Technology, with Special Emphasis on Telecommunications," Working Paper Series 416, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    2. Gunnar Eliasson & Gunnar Eliasson & Dan Johansson & Erol Taymaz, 2024. "Firm Turnover and the Rate of Macro Economic Growth: Simulating the Macroeconomic Effects of Schumpeterian Creative Destruction," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 17(2), pages 279-296.
    3. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2023. "Bringing markets back into economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 686-710.
    4. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1992. "The Theory of the Firm and the Theory of Economic Growth: An essay on the economics of institutions, competition and the capacity of the political system to cope with unexpected change," Working Paper Series 349, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1993. "Endogenous Economic Growth through Selection," Working Paper Series 397, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Aug 1994.
    6. Antonov, Mikhail & Trofimov, Georgi, 1992. "Insider Trading, Micro Diversity and the Long-Run Macro Efficiency," Working Paper Series 355, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunnar Eliasson, 2018. "Why Complex, Data Demanding and Difficult to Estimate Agent Based Models? Lessons from a Decades Long Research Program," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 4-60.
    2. Eliasson, Gunnar & Johansson, Dan & Taymaz, Erol, 2004. "Simulating the New Economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 289-314, September.
    3. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1991. "The Micro Frustrations of Privatizing Eastern Europe," Working Paper Series 306, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Apr 1992.
    4. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2005. "The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 428-456, October.
    5. Gunnar Eliasson, 2015. "The incomplete Schumpeter Stockholm School connection," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 45-56, January.
    6. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1993. "Endogenous Economic Growth through Selection," Working Paper Series 397, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Aug 1994.
    7. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2023. "Bringing markets back into economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 686-710.
    8. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1992. "The Theory of the Firm and the Theory of Economic Growth: An essay on the economics of institutions, competition and the capacity of the political system to cope with unexpected change," Working Paper Series 349, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    9. Mulligan, Robert F., 2004. "Fractal analysis of highly volatile markets: an application to technology equities," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 155-179, February.
    10. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1992. "Education, Competence Development and Economic Growth - A Micro Explanation to Macro Economic Growth," Working Paper Series 350, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    11. Eliasson, Gunnar, 1992. "A Note: On Privatization, Contract Technology and Economic Growth," Working Paper Series 339, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    12. Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2015. "An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 305-332, October.
    13. Labadi, Moufida & Nekhili, Mehdi, 2012. "Structure de propriété et partage de la valeur ajoutée : application aux entreprises françaises non financières du SBF120," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 12.
    14. Segelod, Esbjorn, 2000. "Investments and investment processes in professional service groups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 135-154, September.
    15. Gunnar Eliasson & Pontus Braunerhjelm, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Catch Up and New Industrial Competence Bloc Formation in the Baltic Sea Region," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & John Foster (ed.), The Evolution of Economic and Innovation Systems, edition 127, pages 341-372, Springer.
    16. Michael Neugart & Matteo G. Richiardi, 2012. "Agent-based models of the labor market," LABORatorio R. Revelli Working Papers Series 125, LABORatorio R. Revelli, Centre for Employment Studies.
    17. Cantner, Uwe & Pyka, Andreas, 1998. "Technological evolution -- an analysis within the knowledge-based approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 85-107, March.
    18. Caroli, Eve, 2007. "Internal Versus External Labour Flexibility: The Role of Knowledge Codification," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 201, pages 107-118, July.
    19. Cyert, Richard M. & Kumar, Praveen, 1996. "Economizing by firms through learning and adaptation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 211-231, March.
    20. Gerard Ballot & Antoine Mandel & Annick Vignes, 2015. "Agent-based modeling and economic theory: where do we stand?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 199-220, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijm:journl:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:182-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jinjing Li (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.microsimulation.pub .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.