IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jabe00/v11y2022i1p1-17.html

The Impact of Socio-Economic and Psychographic Factors on Financial Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Babita Jha

    (Christ University (Deemed), India)

  • Lokesh Vijayvargy

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management, India)

  • Srikant Gupta

    (Jaipuria Institute of Management, India)

Abstract

Financial inclusion is a crucial factor in mainstreaming the low-income population with the formal financial system. It provides access to credit and provides a broad range of financial services. However, factors like illiteracy, inadequate income, and lack of awareness limit the poor people to utilize services offered by the bank. The study examines the Financial Attitude (FA), Financial Behavior (FB), and Financial Knowledge (FK) among the people of Rajasthan and interprets the effect on financial inclusion. This research is segregated based on aspects leading to financial exclusion like age, gender, income, education level, occupation, demographic, etc. The comprehensive research in studying the impact of socio-economic and psychographic factors on financial inclusion reveals that people are concerned about saving money for their future but still, there an enormous scope of better utilization of savings.

Suggested Citation

  • Babita Jha & Lokesh Vijayvargy & Srikant Gupta, 2022. "The Impact of Socio-Economic and Psychographic Factors on Financial Inclusion," International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (IJABE), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jabe00:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJABE.305116
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grable, John & Lytton, Ruth H., 1999. "Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument," Financial Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 163-181.
    2. Charles Ham & Nicholas Seybert & Sean Wang, 2018. "Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 234-264, March.
    3. Hallahan, Terrence & Faff, Robert & McKenzie, Michael, 2003. "An exploratory investigation of the relation between risk tolerance scores and demographic characteristics," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4-5), pages 483-502, December.
    4. Ann-Renée Blais & Elke U. Weber, 2006. "A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 33-47, July.
    5. John E. Grable & Michael J. Roszkowski, 2008. "The influence of mood on the willingness to take financial risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 905-923, October.
    6. Sara Konrath & Brian P Meier & Brad J Bushman, 2014. "Development and Validation of the Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. William J. Wales & Pankaj C. Patel & G. T. Lumpkin, 2013. "In Pursuit of Greatness: CEO Narcissism, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance Variance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 1041-1069, September.
    8. Ann-Renée Blais & Elke U. Weber, 2006. "A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT)Scale for Adult Populations," CIRANO Working Papers 2006s-24, CIRANO.
    9. Hoi Yan Cheung & Joseph Wu & Jun Tao, 2016. "Predicting domain-specific risk-taking attitudes of mainland China university students: a hyper core self-evaluation approach," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 79-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zandri Dickason-Koekemoer & Sune Ferreira-Schenk, 2022. "Constructing a Model for Domain-specific Risk-taking, Life Satisfaction and Risk Tolerance of Investors," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 84-90, July.
    2. Pragati Hemrajani & Rajni & Rahul Dhiman, 2024. "Retail Investors’ Financial Risk Tolerance and Risk-taking Behaviour: The Role of Psychological Factors," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 13(1), pages 87-105, January.
    3. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 578-603, May.
    4. Ramudzuli Pfano Michael & Muzindutsi Paul-Francois, 2018. "Determinants of Financial and Non-Financial Risk Tolerance among Students at Selected South African Universities," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 293-302, December.
    5. Bayer, Ya'akov M. & Shapir, Offer Moshe & Shapir-Tidhar, Michal H. & Shtudiner, Zeev, 2024. "Navigating the financial fog: The impact of pandemic priming on economic decisions and future valuations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Hemrajani, Pragati & Rajni, & Khan, Muskan & Dhiman, Rahul, 2023. "Financial risk tolerance: A review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1119-1133.
    7. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Vrajlal Sapovadia & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "Role of Gender in Predicting Determinant of Financial Risk Tolerance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Yiyun Shou & Joel Olney, 2020. "Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(1), pages 112-134, January.
    9. Eva M. Krockow & Masanori Takezawa & Briony D. Pulford & Andrew M. Colman & Samuel Smithers & Toshimasa Kita & Yo Nakawake, 2018. "Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(1), pages 61-72, January.
    10. Ranganathan, Kavitha & Lejarraga, Tomás, 2021. "Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    11. Bose, Neha & Sgroi, Daniel, 2019. "The Role of Theory of Mind and “Small Talk” Communication in Strategic Decision-Making," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 409, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    12. Arunachalam Narayanan & Brent B. Moritz, 2015. "Decision Making and Cognition in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1216-1234, August.
    13. Alice Wieland & James Sundali & Markus Kemmelmeier & Rakesh Sarin, 2014. "Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won't accept less," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(6), pages 558-571, November.
    14. Greiner, Michael & Kim, Jaemin & Cordon Thor, Jennifer, 2023. "Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Amanda Safford & James Sundali & Federico Guerrero, 2018. "Does Experiencing a Crash Make All the Difference? An Experiment on the Depression Babies Hypothesis," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, May.
    16. Fung, Hung-Gay & Qiao, Penghua & Yau, Jot & Zeng, Yuping, 2020. "Leader narcissism and outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from Chinese firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    17. James Alm & Antoine Malézieux, 2021. "40 years of tax evasion games: a meta-analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 699-750, September.
    18. Humaira Mumtaz & Iqbal Javed & Allah Bakhsh, 2019. "Impact of Psychological Consequences on Poverty: An Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 70-79.
    19. Debapriya Jojo Paul & Julia Henker & Sian Owen, 2019. "The aggregate impacts of tournament incentives in experimental asset markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(2), pages 441-476, June.
    20. Gürdal, Mehmet Y. & Kuzubaş, Tolga U. & Saltoğlu, Burak, 2017. "Measures of individual risk attitudes and portfolio choice: Evidence from pension participants," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 186-203.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jabe00:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.