IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jmsjnl/v15y2025i1p116.html

Prevalence of Sustainability Metrics within Executive Compensation Schemes in Large US Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Jomo Sankara
  • Madeline Trimble

Abstract

This study is a descriptive qualitative assessment that examines the inclusion and extent of sustainability metrics into executive compensation packages among Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) firms based on 2023 proxy statements. With growing stakeholder pressure, companies increasingly link executive pay to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals, which has been linked to improved corporate social responsibility, firm value, and lending accountability to strategic goals. Enhanced sustainability disclosures have been shown to be beneficial for most firms, yet challenges remain in balancing financial and ESG objectives. While the prevalence and form of sustainability metrics differ by industry, most DJIA firms include sustainability metrics in short-term incentive pay, even though sustainability practices are associated with achieving long-term success. Furthermore, recent political and corporate shifts have led some firms to scale back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and sustainability efforts, raising concerns about the future of ESG-linked incentives. Given the rapid growth of ESG-related compensation and evolving regulations, this analysis provides timely insights into the role of executive incentives in driving corporate sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jomo Sankara & Madeline Trimble, 2025. "Prevalence of Sustainability Metrics within Executive Compensation Schemes in Large US Companies," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(1), pages 116-116, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/download/0/0/51628/56134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/0/51628
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsang, Albert & Frost, Tracie & Cao, Huijuan, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    2. Zakaria, Idlan, 2012. "Performance measures, benchmarks and targets in executive remuneration contracts of UK firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 189-203.
    3. Cho, Charles H. & Patten, Dennis M., 2007. "The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 639-647.
    4. Adams, Carol A. & Frost, Geoffrey R., 2008. "Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 288-302.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Hue Hwa Au Yong & Steen Thomsen & Khine Kyaw, 2024. "Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8526-8539, December.
    2. Domenico Raucci & Lara Tarquinio, 2015. "A Study of the Economic and Non-Financial Performance Indicators in Corporate Sustainability Reports," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 216-216, June.
    3. Liu, Siwen & Heijden, Hans van der, 2025. "Self-regulation and self-presentation in sustainability reporting: Evidence from firms’ voluntary water disclosure," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Meibo Hu & Lawrence Loh, 2018. "Board Governance and Sustainability Disclosure: A Cross-Sectional Study of Singapore-Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Li, Ziyang & Luo, Tao & Li, Jiangyi & Tian, Yihao, 2024. "Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    6. Elena Nechita & Cristina Lidia Manea & Elena-Mirela Nichita & Alina-Mihaela Irimescu & Diana Manea, 2020. "Is Financial Information Influencing the Reporting on SDGs? Empirical Evidence from Central and Eastern European Chemical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-34, November.
    7. Nick Sciulli, 2011. "The views of managers from a local coastal council on sustainability reporting issues," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 139-160, June.
    8. Miguel Marco‐Fondevila & José M. Moneva Abadía & Sabina Scarpellini, 2018. "CSR and green economy: Determinants and correlation of firms’ sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 756-771, September.
    9. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    10. Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2017. "Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 102-118.
    11. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    12. Cong, Yu & Freedman, Martin & Park, Jin Dong, 2014. "Tone at the top: CEO environmental rhetoric and environmental performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 322-327.
    13. Yang Deng & Tze San Ong & Rosmila Senik, 2024. "Trick or treat? A bibliometric literature review of corporate social responsibility and earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4361-4383, September.
    14. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene, 2017. "Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality," MPRA Paper 85472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Binh Hoang Duc & Khang Do Ba, 2017. "Business responses to climate change: strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Vietnam," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 596-620, August.
    16. Zhang, Jinlong & Qi, Fengyu & Wu, Mingyue, 2025. "Market-oriented environmental regulation and ESG rating divergence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Chang, Yingying & Du, Xingqiang & Zeng, Quan, 2021. "Does environmental information disclosure mitigate corporate risk? Evidence from China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    18. Florentina Moisescu, 2025. "Sustainability and Financial Performance: Exploring the Interconnections Through the Accounting Perspective in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 250-257.
    19. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    20. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jmsjnl:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.