IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v18y2026i3p84.html

Financial and Socio-Environmental Returns in Saudi Impact Funds: Synergies Versus Trade-Offs

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hariri

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics between the financial and socio-environmental returns of Saudi Arabian impact investment funds, a field that remains largely unexplored. These dynamics constitute an ongoing academic debate on the trade-offs and synergies between the dual objectives of these funds. To uncover these dynamics, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using robust statistical techniques on a census of 22 publicly funded impact funds authorized by a competent regulatory institution. The findings reveal that Saudi impact funds underperform relative to their stock market benchmarks, the Tadawul All Share Index. Despite this, funds with income-generating objectives achieved better financial returns than those focused on capital preservation. Furthermore, Saudi impact funds, compared to global benchmarks, significantly exceed them in Environmental, Social, and Governance returns while remaining virtually undifferentiated in terms of risk. A positive and significant correlation was also found between the financial and socio-environmental returns of these funds, providing evidence of their synergy. In conclusion, Saudi impact funds exhibit a trade-off compared to their market benchmarks, implying a reduction in financial returns in exchange for achieving long-term socio-environmental benefits. However, it is possible to invest in these funds, aware of the financial sacrifice, to leverage the synergistic effect and obtain the best possible financial performance within the segment while simultaneously achieving a powerful and tangible socio-environmental impact. Fund managers are encouraged to develop innovative investment strategies to maximize synergy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hariri, 2026. "Financial and Socio-Environmental Returns in Saudi Impact Funds: Synergies Versus Trade-Offs," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/52892/57665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/52892
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Croux & Catherine Dehon, 2010. "Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(4), pages 497-515, November.
    2. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Introduction: Social Return On Investment (SROI)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 95-97.
    3. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    4. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Zhenghao & Zhou, Hang & Ruan, Mengyu & Li, Qin, 2025. "When major customers matter: customer concentration and ESG rating disagreement," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    2. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2025. "Tech firms and the renewable energy sector: Exploring the moderating effects of institutional ownership on financial connectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Berle, Erika & He, Wanwei (Angela) & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2025. "The stock market and corporate consequences of ethical exclusions by the world’s largest fund," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Wang, Jianli & Wang, Shaolin & Dong, Minghua & Wang, Hongxia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Salakhova, Dilyara & Giuzio, Margherita & Kapadia, Sujit & Mazzolini, Giulio, 2025. "Sustainability labels vs. reality: how climate-friendly are green and ESG funds?," Working Paper Series 3121, European Central Bank.
    8. Vu, Thanh Nam & Junttila, Juha-Pekka & Lehkonen, Heikki, 2024. "ESG news and long-run stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    10. Fan, Kwok Yuen & Shen, Jianfu & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Cheng, Louis T.W., 2024. "ESG components and equity returns: Evidence from real estate investment trusts," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    11. Yu, Haixu & Liang, Chuanyu & Liu, Zhaohua & Wang, He, 2023. "News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Kim, Sehoon & Kumar, Nitish & Lee, Jongsub & Oh, Junho, 2025. "ESG lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Tu, Qiang & Zuo, Limei & Liang, Anran & Yao, Ye & Liu, Diyi, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence decrease enterprise productivity? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    14. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    15. Marohn, Marcel & Auer, Benjamin R., 2024. "A note on Steuer and Utz’s (2023) multi-objective optimization approach for generating sustainability-efficient fronts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 792-797.
    16. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Inderst, Roman & Opp, Marcus M., 2025. "Sustainable finance versus environmental policy: Does greenwashing justify a taxonomy for sustainable investments?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Lien, Donald & Wang, Lie-Huey, 2025. "ESG peer spillover effect in supply chain: Evidence from Taiwan semiconductor industry," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Kurbus, Barbara & Rant, Vasja, 2025. "A legal origins perspective on ESG rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Fiorillo, Paolo & Meles, Antonio & Ricciardi, Antonio & Verdoliva, Vincenzo, 2025. "ESG performance and the cost of debt. Evidence from the corporate bond market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.