IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v18y2026i3p84.html

Financial and Socio-Environmental Returns in Saudi Impact Funds: Synergies Versus Trade-Offs

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hariri

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics between the financial and socio-environmental returns of Saudi Arabian impact investment funds, a field that remains largely unexplored. These dynamics constitute an ongoing academic debate on the trade-offs and synergies between the dual objectives of these funds. To uncover these dynamics, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using robust statistical techniques on a census of 22 publicly funded impact funds authorized by a competent regulatory institution. The findings reveal that Saudi impact funds underperform relative to their stock market benchmarks, the Tadawul All Share Index. Despite this, funds with income-generating objectives achieved better financial returns than those focused on capital preservation. Furthermore, Saudi impact funds, compared to global benchmarks, significantly exceed them in Environmental, Social, and Governance returns while remaining virtually undifferentiated in terms of risk. A positive and significant correlation was also found between the financial and socio-environmental returns of these funds, providing evidence of their synergy. In conclusion, Saudi impact funds exhibit a trade-off compared to their market benchmarks, implying a reduction in financial returns in exchange for achieving long-term socio-environmental benefits. However, it is possible to invest in these funds, aware of the financial sacrifice, to leverage the synergistic effect and obtain the best possible financial performance within the segment while simultaneously achieving a powerful and tangible socio-environmental impact. Fund managers are encouraged to develop innovative investment strategies to maximize synergy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hariri, 2026. "Financial and Socio-Environmental Returns in Saudi Impact Funds: Synergies Versus Trade-Offs," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/52892/57665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/52892
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Croux & Catherine Dehon, 2010. "Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 19(4), pages 497-515, November.
    2. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Introduction: Social Return On Investment (SROI)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 95-97.
    3. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    4. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2025. "Tech firms and the renewable energy sector: Exploring the moderating effects of institutional ownership on financial connectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Salakhova, Dilyara & Giuzio, Margherita & Kapadia, Sujit & Mazzolini, Giulio, 2025. "Sustainability labels vs. reality: how climate-friendly are green and ESG funds?," Working Paper Series 3121, European Central Bank.
    3. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    4. Yu, Haixu & Liang, Chuanyu & Liu, Zhaohua & Wang, He, 2023. "News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Kim, Sehoon & Kumar, Nitish & Lee, Jongsub & Oh, Junho, 2025. "ESG lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Tu, Qiang & Zuo, Limei & Liang, Anran & Yao, Ye & Liu, Diyi, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence decrease enterprise productivity? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    7. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    8. Marohn, Marcel & Auer, Benjamin R., 2024. "A note on Steuer and Utz’s (2023) multi-objective optimization approach for generating sustainability-efficient fronts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 792-797.
    9. Kurbus, Barbara & Rant, Vasja, 2025. "A legal origins perspective on ESG rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Nakagawa, Kei & Morita, Keisuke & Sakemoto, Ryuta, 2025. "Stochastic ESG scores and nonpecuniary ESG preferences: An extension to CAPM," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Lou, Zhukun & Li, Sujie & Tong, Jingyi & Zhao, Jing, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity capital," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Corinna Irina Ketterling, 2026. "From voluntary CSR to binding ESG frameworks: a legal perspective on sustainability disclosure standards," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Alessi, Lucia & Ossola, Elisa & Panzica, Roberto, 2023. "When do investors go green? Evidence from a time-varying asset-pricing model," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Rojo-Suárez, Javier & Alonso-Conde, Ana B. & Gonzalez-Ruiz, Juan David, 2024. "Does sustainability improve financial performance? An analysis of Latin American oil and gas firms," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Luo, Deqing & Shan, Xun & Yan, Jingzhou & Yan, Qianhui, 2023. "Sustainable investment under ESG volatility and ambiguity," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Nikolaos Iliopoulos, 2025. "Covariance-Aware Simplex Projection for Cardinality-Constrained Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2512.19986, arXiv.org.
    18. Andrew W. Lo & Ruixun Zhang, 2025. "Performance Attribution for Portfolio Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7537-7559, September.
    19. Bassen, Alexander & Kordsachia, Othar & Lopatta, Kerstin & Tan, Weiqiang, 2025. "Revenue alignment with the EU taxonomy regulation in developed markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Guo, Chun & Luo, Jingbo, 2026. "Green supply chain management and ESG rating divergence: A quasi-natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.