Author
Listed:
- Wang, Duo
- Hu, Yunge
- Yang, Lijia
- Li, Yanxi
Abstract
Based on the Resource-Based Theory, this study systematically examines the impact of ESG structural imbalance on corporate green innovation from the dual perspectives of "strategy-driven" and "compliance-driven". The findings reveal that ESG structural imbalance significantly inhibits corporate green innovation, which supports the "compliance-driven" hypothesis. And the degradation in internal self-sustaining capability and constraints in external resource acquisition serve as primary mechanisms. In addition, state-owned enterprises or firms with operating in favorable external information environments can mitigate the negative effect of ESG structural imbalance on green innovation by buffering resource redundancy and reducing investor decision noise. Further analysis shows that ESG structural imbalance offsets the promoting effect of overall ESG performance on green innovation, preventing green innovation from achieving expected enhancement. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of ESG structural imbalance on green innovation is primarily driven by the environmental dimension. And compared to substantive green innovation, ESG structural imbalance more substantially suppresses strategic green innovation and degrades green innovation quality. By focusing on corporate green innovation activities, this study expands the connotation of sustainable development theory from an internal ESG equilibrium perspective, offering policy insights for enterprises to optimize ESG strategic frameworks and for regulators to refine ESG disclosure systems.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Duo & Hu, Yunge & Yang, Lijia & Li, Yanxi, 2026.
"The equilibrium dilemma: ESG structural imbalance and corporate green innovation,"
Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 504-534.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:504-534
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2026.01.031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:90:y:2026:i:c:p:504-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.