IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v17y2025i4p63.html

Does Business Model Risk Affect Corporate Labor Policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Lobna Bouslimi

Abstract

In this study, we attempt to provide a key understanding on how and through which channel customer concentration (Business risk) affects managers’ employment decision efficiency. Understanding the costs associated with customer concentration is important, as the modern business-to-business economy continues to experience higher levels of concentration and supply-chain integration. We find that managers of firms with higher customer concentrations are less efficient in their hiring decisions. Our main results are robust when using exogenous shocks based on federal laws to address endogeneity concerns. Additionally, we provide evidence that this negative impact is more pronounced in firms that offer more trade credit to larger customers, have higher financial risk, invest heavily in research and development, or deal with customers at greater risk of default.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobna Bouslimi, 2025. "Does Business Model Risk Affect Corporate Labor Policy?," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(4), pages 1-63, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/51388/55829
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/51388
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itzkowitz, Jennifer, 2013. "Customers and cash: How relationships affect suppliers' cash holdings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 159-180.
    2. R. David Mclean & Mengxin Zhao, 2014. "The Business Cycle, Investor Sentiment, and Costly External Finance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(3), pages 1377-1409, June.
    3. B. Korcan Ak & Panos N. Patatoukas, 2016. "Customer-Base Concentration and Inventory Efficiencies: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(2), pages 258-272, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnes C. S. Cheng & Wenli Huang & Shaojun Zhang, 2020. "Major government customer and management earnings forecasts," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Zhu, Minghao & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2021. "Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Wen, Wen & Ke, Yun & Liu, Xuejiao, 2021. "Customer concentration and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    4. Zhao, Shan & He, Xinming & Ma, Baichao & Zuo, Wenming, 2025. "Customer concentration, firm R&D investment and moderation effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Cao, Yue & Dong, Yizhe & Ma, Diandian & Sun, Li, 2021. "Customer concentration and corporate risk-taking," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Zhang, Mengtao & Mo, Yifan & Liu, Shanmin, 2025. "Does customer concentration intensify or alleviate stock price fluctuation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(PA).
    7. Wei, Yufen & Tang, Jinghua & He, Hongbo & Wu, Chanjun & Lin, Muyangzi & Xie, Haonan, 2025. "Customer concentration and corporate greenwashing," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Pan, Jianping & Yu, Manjiao & Liu, Jiayuan & Fan, Rui, 2020. "Customer concentration and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Jyun‐Ying Fu, 2023. "Customer concentration and corporate charitable donations: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 545-561, January.
    10. Dong, Yizhe & Li, Chang & Li, Haoyu, 2021. "Customer concentration and M&A performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Di Gao & Yuan Zhao & Jiangming Ma, 2023. "How Does Supply Chain Information Disclosure Relate to Corporate Investment Efficiency? Evidence from Chinese-Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Jiangming Ma & Di Gao, 2023. "The Impact of Sustainable Supply-Chain Partnership on Bank Loans: Evidence from Chinese-Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Jhang, Shih-Sian (Sherwin) & Ogden, Joseph P. & Suresh, Nallan C., 2019. "Operational and financial configurations contingent on market power status," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 91-109.
    14. Yang, Jinyu & Dong, Dayong & Liang, Chao, 2025. "Sequential questioning and structured responses: Enhancing the information effectiveness of corporate site visits," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Tan, Lihua & Yang, Zhaojun, 2025. "Optimal equity split under unobservable investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Chen, Xiao & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Liu, Leo Jiahe, 2025. "Audit implications of major customer diversity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    17. Yingying Xin & Xiao Zeng & Zhengying Luo, 2022. "Customers' tone in MD&A disclosure and suppliers' inventory efficiency: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3833-3853, December.
    18. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin, 2019. "The Effect of Financial Constraints on Audit Fees," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 59-87.
    19. Wang, Jiaxin & Zhao, Mu & Huang, Xiang & Song, Zilong & Sun, Di, 2024. "Supply chain diffusion mechanisms for AI applications: A perspective on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Hao, Ying & Chou, Robin K. & Ko, Kuan-Cheng & Yang, Nien-Tzu, 2018. "The 52-week high, momentum, and investor sentiment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 167-183.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.