IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v13y2021i10p63.html

A Study on Economic Spatial Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Author

Listed:
  • Jincheng Yang
  • Xinqu Xia
  • Mu Zhang

Abstract

Based on the multi-index data of 11 cities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay in 2016, the urban economic quality was calculated by TOPSIS method. Applying the modified gravitational model, the economy spatial linkage characteristics of core city-to-periphery city and periphery city-to-periphery city were analyzed. In addition, based on the method of network density analysis, centrality measures, core-periphery structure analysis to make a further verification about facts carried out from spatial connection analysis. This study shows that the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay has an obvious core-periphery structure, and the overall economic network connection of Greater Bay is not strong. Guangdong-Shenzhen-Hong Kong is the core urban agglomeration in the Greater Bay Area. Dongguan and Foshan are transforming from marginal cities to semi-marginal cities. The marginal cities are limited by geographical distance or the economic environment, which leads to their development far behind the overall development of the Greater Bay Area. Finally, combined with the new wooden barrel theory and location advantage analysis method, advices were carried out to build a higher-level of the Greater Bay Area in future by dividing the Greater Bay Area into three major urban agglomerations. Urban agglomerations were proposed to meet the resources and industrial demands of the core urban imperfections and drive the economic development of the marginal cities at the same time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jincheng Yang & Xinqu Xia & Mu Zhang, 2021. "A Study on Economic Spatial Structure of Urban Agglomerations in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 1-63, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/36764/36795
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/36764
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Taylor & Michael Hoyler, 2000. "The spatial order of European cities under conditions of contemporary globalisation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 91(2), pages 176-189, May.
    2. Kathy Pain, 2008. "Examining 'Core-Periphery' Relationships in a Global City-Region: The Case of London and South East England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1161-1172.
    3. Youngmi Lee, 2011. "Economic Development Networks Among Local Governments," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 113-134, April.
    4. Jane Rongerude & Mônica Haddad, 2016. "Cores and Peripheries: Spatial Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher Distribution in the San Francisco Bay Area Region, 2000--2010," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 417-436, May.
    5. Frank Bruinsma & Piet Rietveld, 1993. "Urban Agglomerations in European Infrastructure Networks," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 919-934, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Hongchang & Kong, Lingtong & Zhao, Xiaojun, 2025. "The evolution and influencing factors of digital freight structure in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: A complex network analysis perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shaopei & Claramunt, Christophe & Ray, Cyril, 2014. "A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 12-23.
    2. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    4. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Cao, Jing & Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy & Wang, Yinhai & Li, Qingquan, 2013. "Accessibility impacts of China’s high-speed rail network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-21.
    6. J Gutiérrez & A Monzón & J M Piñero, 1998. "Accessibility, Network Efficiency, and Transport Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(8), pages 1337-1350, August.
    7. Gilles Van Hamme & Mathieu Strale, 2012. "Port gateways in globalization: the case of Antwerp," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 83-96, March.
    8. Yoo, Sihyun & Beumer, Ruben & van Wee, Bert & Mouter, Niek & Molin, Eric, 2025. "Perceived accessibility by air transportation: A focus group study of potential air travelers in The Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Kotios, Angelos & Saratsis, Yiannis & Kallioras, Dimitris & Metaxas, Theodore, 2005. "Balkans and Europe: identifying spatial development dimensions," MPRA Paper 42298, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Olga Gritsai, 2004. "Global Business Services in Moscow: Patterns of Involvement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 2001-2024, September.
    11. Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Gutiérrez, Javier & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 185-203, March.
    12. Karen Lai, 2012. "Differentiated Markets: Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong in China’s Financial Centre Network," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 1275-1296, May.
    13. Bas Karreman, 2009. "Financial Geographies And Emerging Markets In Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(2), pages 260-266, April.
    14. Scott Baum & Michelle Haynes & Yolanda van Gellecum & Jung Hoon Han, 2006. "Advantage and Disadvantage across Australia's Extended Metropolitan Regions: A Typology of Socioeconomic Outcomes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1549-1579, August.
    15. Cascetta, Ennio & Papola, Andrea & Pagliara, Francesca & Marzano, Vittorio, 2011. "Analysis of mobility impacts of the high speed Rome–Naples rail link using withinday dynamic mode service choice models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 635-643.
    16. Guineng Chen & Marcos Correia & João de Abreu e Silva, 2015. "Accessibility Indicators for Regional Economic Development: An Application to the Regional Distributive Effects of High-Speed Rail in Spain," ERSA conference papers ersa15p393, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Canfei He & Xiyan Mao, 2016. "Population dynamics and regional development in China," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(3), pages 535-549.
    18. Hyunsang Ha & In Won Lee & Richard C. Feiock, 2016. "Organizational Network Activities for Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(1), pages 15-31, February.
    19. Martijn J. Burger & Evert J. Meijers & Frank G. Oort, 2014. "Multiple Perspectives on Functional Coherence: Heterogeneity and Multiplexity in the Randstad," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(4), pages 444-464, September.
    20. Wangbao Liu & Quan Hou & Zhihao Xie & Xin Mai, 2020. "Urban Network and Regions in China: An Analysis of Daily Migration with Complex Networks Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.