IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v12y2017i4p95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fairness Relationship with Trust and Trustworthiness in Mobile Sector in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Al-Amri
  • Abdulaziz Al Shammary

Abstract

This study attempt to explore the relationship of most fairness factors (distributive, procedural, and interactional) which in turn contribute significantly to customer trust and trustworthiness, whereby we consider the study investigation and finding as an important key success of existing companies as well as market entrants, as the challenges and fast growing characterizing the market with a wide increasing range of demands versus narrow offers, whereby this mismatch affecting the perceived fairness and trust relationship and further influence temper of trustworthiness of both parties. The conceptual model, literature review and proposed hypotheses and its justification were been built based on the most related theories alike social exchange, equity and fairness heuristic theories and mutual previous studies in the same or in related field, the study was performed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, among (300) customers of different mobile providers, the results reported a positive relationship of proposed hypotheses which in turn proves the importance of fairness different dimension and the impact of the same on customer trust and trustworthiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Al-Amri & Abdulaziz Al Shammary, 2017. "The Fairness Relationship with Trust and Trustworthiness in Mobile Sector in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 1-95, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/65514/36477
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/65514
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Michel Chapuis, 2012. "Price Fairness versus Pricing Fairness," Post-Print hal-00694108, HAL.
    2. Zapata-Phelan, Cindy P. & Colquitt, Jason A. & Scott, Brent A. & Livingston, Beth, 2009. "Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 93-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Chen & Shaofen Fang & Yujie Li & Haibin Wang, 2019. "Does Identification Influence Continuous E-Commerce Consumption? The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Chan, Sow Hup Joanne & Lai, Ho Yan Isabella, 2017. "Understanding the link between communication satisfaction, perceived justice and organizational citizenship behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 214-223.
    3. Chen, Xiaogang & Ma, Jing & Jin, Jiafei & Fosh, Patricia, 2013. "Information privacy, gender differences, and intrinsic motivation in the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 917-926.
    4. Lee, Randy & Mai, Ke Michael & Qiu, Feng & Ilies, Remus & Tang, Pok Man, 2022. "Are you too happy to serve others? When and why positive affect makes customer mistreatment experience feel worse," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán-González & Eric Schniter, 2015. "Why real leisure really matters: incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 284-301, June.
    6. David C. Thomas & Elizabeth C. Ravlin & Yuan Liao & Daniel L. Morrell & Kevin Au, 2016. "Collectivist Values, Exchange Ideology and Psychological Contract Preference," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 255-281, April.
    7. R. Krishankumar & K. S. Ravichandran, 2018. "Realizing the effects of trust and personality in cross functional teams using ANFIS classification framework," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 243-276, June.
    8. Lantao Zhu & Xi Li & YingChuan Wang, 2021. "The Impact of Social Capital on Residents’ Supportive Attitude to Tourism Development: The Mediation Role of Perception of Justice," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    9. Claudia-Elena ?uclea & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Carmen-Eugenia Nastase, 2018. "The Fairness of Pricing Tactics for Hotels: Perceptions of Romanian Customers," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(S12), pages 905-905, November.
    10. Hyung-Woo Lee & Dong-Young Rhee, 2023. "Effects of Organizational Justice on Employee Satisfaction: Integrating the Exchange and the Value-Based Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Abdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev & Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Oyniso Zakirova, 2022. "Paternalistic Leadership Styles and Employee Voice: The Roles of Trust in Supervisors and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Huaiyong Wang & Guangli Lu & Yongfang Liu, 2017. "Ethical Leadership and Loyalty to Supervisor in China: The Roles of Interactional Justice and Collectivistic Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 529-543, December.
    13. Jonathan Farrar & Steven E. Kaplan & Linda Thorne, 2019. "The Effect of Interactional Fairness and Detection on Taxpayers’ Compliance Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 167-180, January.
    14. Cavdar Aksoy, Nilsah & Yazici, Nihal, 2023. "Does justice affect brand advocacy? Online brand advocacy behaviors as a response to hotel customers’ justice perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    15. Johanna Mollerstrom, 2022. "Favoritism and cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 293-307, June.
    16. Liyuan Wang & Tianyi Xie, 2023. "Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Gupta, Vishal, 2013. "Leadership and Creativity in the Indian R&D Laboratories: Examining the Role of Autonomous Motivation, Psychological Capital and Justice Perceptions," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-11-09, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    18. Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis, 2011. "Insurance of Techno-Organizational Ventures and Procedural Ethics: Lessons from the Deepwater Horizon Explosion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 45-61, April.
    19. van Dijke, Marius & Leunissen, Joost M. & Wildschut, Tim & Sedikides, Constantine, 2019. "Nostalgia promotes intrinsic motivation and effort in the presence of low interactional justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 46-61.
    20. Tekmen, Esra Erenler & Kaptangil, Kerem, 2022. "The Determinants of Constructive Deviant Behaviour of Frontline Tourism Employees: An Exploration with Perceived Supervisory Support and Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 10(1), pages 58-74.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.