IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v16y2023i4p1.html

A Comparison of Information Criterion for Choosing Copula Models

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Benito Muela
  • Carmen López-Martín

Abstract

The object of this paper is to analyse the ability of the Information Criterion in selecting the best copula model. For this study, we carry out a simulation exercise considering five one-parameter copula families- Normal, Student-t with ν degree freedom, Clayton, Gumbel and Frank. For each family copulas, three degrees of dependence and three size samples. The Information Criterion included in the comparison are AIC, BIC, HQIC, SIC. The results obtained are as follow; (i) we find that for a high dependence level (0.9) the reliability of the Information Criterion (IC) is quite good, but it reduces with the dependence level; (ii) the performance of the IC not only depends on the dependence degree but the size sample. In the case of considering negative dependence the reliability of the IC does not depend on the dependence degree but the size sample. As the size sample reduce the performed of the IC reduce. To last, in a comparison among the IC considered, we find that the BIC criterion is the most reliable follow by SIC. AIC and HQIC reaps similar results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Benito Muela & Carmen López-Martín, 2023. "A Comparison of Information Criterion for Choosing Copula Models," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(4), pages 1-1, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/48543/52273
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/48543
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Embrechts & Giovanni Puccetti, 2006. "Aggregating risk capital, with an application to operational risk," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Springer;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 31(2), pages 71-90, December.
    2. Embrechts, Paul & Puccetti, Giovanni & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2013. "Model uncertainty and VaR aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2750-2764.
    3. Wen, Xiaoqian & Wei, Yu & Huang, Dengshi, 2012. "Measuring contagion between energy market and stock market during financial crisis: A copula approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1435-1446.
    4. Kristin J. Forbes & Roberto Rigobon, 2002. "No Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Comovements," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(5), pages 2223-2261, October.
    5. Shegorika Rajwani & Dilip Kumar, 2019. "Measuring Dependence Between the USA and the Asian Economies: A Time-varying Copula Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(4), pages 962-980, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahadeo, Scott M.R. & Heinlein, Reinhold & Legrenzi, Gabriella D., 2019. "Energy contagion analysis: A new perspective with application to a small petroleum economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 890-903.
    2. Chen, Wang & Wei, Yu & Lang, Qiaoqi & Lin, Yu & Liu, Maojuan, 2014. "Financial market volatility and contagion effect: A copula–multifractal volatility approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 289-300.
    3. Georgios Bampinas & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2017. "Oil and stock markets before and after financial crises: A local Gaussian correlation approach," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(12), pages 1179-1204, December.
    4. Roy, Rudra Prosad & Sinha Roy, Saikat, 2017. "Financial contagion and volatility spillover: An exploration into Indian commodity derivative market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 368-380.
    5. Garcia-Jorcano, Laura & Benito, Sonia, 2020. "Studying the properties of the Bitcoin as a diversifying and hedging asset through a copula analysis: Constant and time-varying," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Zhu, Hui-Ming & Li, Rong & Li, Sufang, 2014. "Modelling dynamic dependence between crude oil prices and Asia-Pacific stock market returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 208-223.
    7. Ferreira, Paulo & Pereira, Éder Johson de Area Leão & Silva, Marcus Fernandes da & Pereira, Hernane Borges, 2019. "Detrended correlation coefficients between oil and stock markets: The effect of the 2008 crisis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 517(C), pages 86-96.
    8. Jiasha Fu & Hui Qiao, 2022. "The Time-Varying Connectedness Between China’s Crude Oil Futures and International Oil Markets: A Return and Volatility Spillover Analysis," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 341-376, December.
    9. Villa-Loaiza, Carlos & Taype-Huaman, Irvin & Benavides-Franco, Julián & Buenaventura-Vera, Guillermo & Carabalí-Mosquera, Jaime, 2023. "Does climate impact the relationship between the energy price and the stock market? The Colombian case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    10. Audrino, Francesco & Tetereva, Anastasija, 2019. "Sentiment spillover effects for US and European companies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 542-567.
    11. Jayech, Selma, 2016. "The contagion channels of July–August-2011 stock market crash: A DAG-copula based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 631-646.
    12. Zhang, Guofu & Liu, Wei, 2018. "Analysis of the international propagation of contagion between oil and stock markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 469-486.
    13. Younis, Ijaz & Shah, Waheed Ullah & Hkiri, Besma & Qureshi, Fiza & Longsheng, Cheng, 2023. "Risk co-movements and portfolio strategies between energy, gold and BRICS markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Starkey, Christopher Michael & Tsafack, Georges, 2023. "Measuring financial contagion: Dealing with the volatility Bias in the correlation dynamics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Renée Fry-McKibbin & Cody Hsiao & Chrismin Tang, 2014. "Contagion and Global Financial Crises: Lessons from Nine Crisis Episodes," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 521-570, July.
    16. Qin, Xiao, 2020. "Oil shocks and financial systemic stress: International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Abubakar Jamaladeen & David E. Omoregie & Samuel F. Onipede & Nafiu A. Bashir, 2022. "A regime-switching skew-normal model of contagion in some selected stock markets," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Rigana, Katerina & Wit, Ernst-Jan Camiel & Cook, Samantha, 2023. "A new way of measuring effects of financial crisis on contagion in currency markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Katerina Rigana & Ernst-Jan Camiel Wit & Samantha Cook, 2021. "Using Network-based Causal Inference to Detect the Sources of Contagion in the Currency Market," Papers 2112.13127, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.