IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v13y2017i1p114.html

Customer Satisfaction Index Model for Indian Banking Industry: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ragu Prasadh R
  • Jayshree Suresh

Abstract

The conventional financial measures have always dominated the business performance evaluation in India. There is a need to augment the current approaches to evaluate the financial health of individual firms and industries. Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) is one of the best solutions which is a customer-based satisfaction benchmarking system and serves as a standard metric, widely implemented in the United States and Europe. However, there is no such index in India and there is a need for a non-financial, customer-based satisfaction metric. This study is a pilot attempt to develop a Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) model, specifically for the Indian banking industry. To achieve this, the focus group technique was employed to find the key determinants of customer satisfaction in the banking industry. The comprehensive thematic analysis revealed a total of six themes and nine sub-themes which have been proposed as the antecedents of customer satisfaction in the CSI model for the Indian banking industry. The future research intends to develop instrumentation based on the focus group results and validate the hypothesized CSI model proposed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragu Prasadh R & Jayshree Suresh, 2017. "Customer Satisfaction Index Model for Indian Banking Industry: A Qualitative Study," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 114-114, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/64184/35206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/64184
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenhall, Robert H. & Langfield-Smith, Kim, 2007. "Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 266-282, August.
    2. Oliver, Richard L & Swan, John E, 1989. "Equity and Disconfirmation Perceptions as Influences on Merchant and Product Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(3), pages 372-383, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alam Zeb & Shabir Ahmad & Gohar Saeed, 2018. "Leadership Effectiveness and Organizational Performance: Exploring Gaps in the Existing Literature," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 10(1), pages 95-106, March.
    2. Yao Lu & Junqi Wang & Chunxiu Zhang & Qin Xiao & Ailian Wang, 2025. "Impact of anthropomorphism on consumer emotions and satisfaction in product failure: behavioral and event-related potentials evidence," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Maxwell Sandada & Nigel Manzanga & Roy Shamhuyenhanzva, 2015. "How Do Board Characteristics Influence Business Performance? Evidence from Non-life Insurance Firms in Zimbabwe," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 11(4), pages 103-116, August.
    4. Gaurav Khatwani & Gopal Das, 2016. "Evaluating combination of individual pre-purchase internet information channels using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique: demographics as moderators," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 28-49.
    5. Shor, Mikhael & Oliver, Richard L., 2006. "Price discrimination through online couponing: Impact on likelihood of purchase and profitability," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 423-440, June.
    6. Nguyen Thi Duc Nguyen & Atsushi Aoyama, 2014. "Impact of Corporate Culture on the Relationship between Efficient Technology Transfer and Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 637-661, December.
    7. Park, Jeong-Yeol & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "You got a free upgrade? What about me? The consequences of unearned preferential treatment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 59-68.
    8. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    9. Sorin Briciu & Dan Ioan Topor & Sorinel Căpuşneanu, 2013. "Integrated Methods For Performance Measurement In Entities From The Wine Sector In Romania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(15), pages 1-2.
    10. Julio Cesar Ferro de Guimarães & Eliana Andréa Severo & César Ricardo Maia de Vasconcelos, 2017. "Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Survey of Companies in Southern Brazil," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(3), pages 352-367, May.
    11. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    12. Sokchan Ok & Thammanoon Hengsadeekul, 2018. "Customer Satisfaction on Service Quality of Bus Transport: A Survey of Passengers from Phnom Penh to Poipet in Cambodia," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 114-131, July.
    13. Babin, Barry J. & Griffin, Mitch, 1998. "The nature of satisfaction: An updated examination and analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 127-136, February.
    14. Etayankara Muralidharan & Wenxia Guo & Hesham Fazel & William Wei, 2021. "Organizational Response to Goods Failure Complaints: The Role of Culture on Perceptions of Interactional Justice and Customer Satisfaction," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1327-1344, December.
    15. Schaefers, Tobias & Leban, Marina & Vogt, Florian, 2022. "On-demand features: Consumer reactions to tangibility and pricing structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 751-761.
    16. M. S. Balaji & Subhash Jha & Marla B. Royne, 2015. "Customer e-complaining behaviours using social media," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11-12), pages 633-654, August.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5853 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Prentice, Catherine & Kadan, Mariam, 2019. "The role of airport service quality in airport and destination choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 40-48.
    19. Korneta Piotr, 2020. "Stakeholders and Performance Management Systems of Small and Medium-Sized Outpatient Clinics," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 211-222, January.
    20. Hasan, Syed Akif & Subhani, Muhammad Imtiaz & Osman, Ms. Amber, 2012. "Consumers’ versatile buying behavior irrespective to high and low involvement products," MPRA Paper 37665, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.