IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i8p1304-d106139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology for the Successful Integration of an Energy Management System to an Operational Environmental System

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Uriarte-Romero

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), 21280 Mexicali, Mexico)

  • Margarita Gil-Samaniego

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), 21280 Mexicali, Mexico)

  • Edgar Valenzuela-Mondaca

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), 21280 Mexicali, Mexico)

  • Juan Ceballos-Corral

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), 21280 Mexicali, Mexico)

Abstract

Despite the fact that the implementation of ISO 50001 has helped organizations to successfully accomplish energy saving policies, there is still a significant disparity in the number of companies certificated under ISO 50001 compared with other standards such as ISO 14001. Considering the compatibilities between both standards, a potential sector is identified for the integration of ISO 50001 in organizations that operate under ISO 14001 systems. The cost and time associated with the development and implementation of the Energy Management System are identified as being amongst the most important obstacles, restricting the number of companies that are inclined to this energy certification. As an attempt to overcome this limitation, in this work, both standards were analyzed in detail and their coincidences identified and organized to propose a novel methodology that allows companies to naturally integrate an Energy Management System based on ISO 50001 into an ISO 14001 already in operation. The results provide evidence of a strong compatibility among the energy and environmental management systems, allowing enterprises to integrate the former with minimum investment and resources. In order to validate the proposed methodology and to demonstrate the agreement between both programs, these procedures were applied in a manufacturing company of the automotive sector, considered as a high energy consumer according to the classification made by the National Commission for the Efficient Use of Energy in Mexico.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Uriarte-Romero & Margarita Gil-Samaniego & Edgar Valenzuela-Mondaca & Juan Ceballos-Corral, 2017. "Methodology for the Successful Integration of an Energy Management System to an Operational Environmental System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1304-:d:106139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham, Thi Hong Hanh, 2015. "Energy management systems and market value: Is there a link?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-78.
    2. Thi Hong Hanh Pham, 2015. "Energy management systems and market value: Is there a link?," Post-Print hal-03705802, HAL.
    3. Thomas Zobel & Charlotte Malmgren, 2016. "Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Tsung-Yung Chiu & Shang-Lien Lo & Yung-Yin Tsai, 2012. "Establishing an Integration-Energy-Practice Model for Improving Energy Performance Indicators in ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Melichar, Mark, 2016. "Energy price shocks and economic activity: Which energy price series should we be using?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 431-443.
    6. Bergek, Anna & Berggren, Christian, 2014. "The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 112-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. P. Pablo Poveda-Orjuela & J. Carlos García-Díaz & Alexander Pulido-Rojano & Germán Cañón-Zabala, 2019. "ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Akvile Lawrence & Patrik Thollander & Magnus Karlsson, 2018. "Drivers, Barriers, and Success Factors for Improving Energy Management in the Pulp and Paper Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-35, June.
    3. P. Pablo Poveda-Orjuela & J. Carlos García-Díaz & Alexander Pulido-Rojano & Germán Cañón-Zabala, 2020. "Parameterization, Analysis, and Risk Management in a Comprehensive Management System with Emphasis on Energy and Performance (ISO 50001: 2018)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-43, October.
    4. Izabela Simon Rampasso & Geraldo Pereira Melo Filho & Rosley Anholon & Robson Amarante de Araujo & Gilson Brito Alves Lima & Luis Perez Zotes & Walter Leal Filho, 2019. "Challenges Presented in the Implementation of Sustainable Energy Management via ISO 50001:2011," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Vichan Nakthong & Kuskana Kubaha, 2019. "Development of a Sustainability Index for an Energy Management System in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izabela Simon Rampasso & Geraldo Pereira Melo Filho & Rosley Anholon & Robson Amarante de Araujo & Gilson Brito Alves Lima & Luis Perez Zotes & Walter Leal Filho, 2019. "Challenges Presented in the Implementation of Sustainable Energy Management via ISO 50001:2011," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Vichan Nakthong & Kuskana Kubaha, 2019. "Development of a Sustainability Index for an Energy Management System in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Stamatis Chrysikopoulos & Panos Chountalas, 2018. "Integrating energy and environmental management systems to enable facilities to qualify for carbon funds," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 938-956, September.
    4. Danquah Jeff Boakye & Ishmael TIngbani & Gabriel Ahinful & Isaac Damoah & Venancio Tauringana, 2020. "Sustainable environmental practices and financial performance: Evidence from listed small and medium‐sized enterprise in the United Kingdom," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2583-2602, September.
    5. Kenjegaliev, Amangeldi & Duygun, Meryem & Mamedshakhova, Djamila, 2016. "Do rating grades convey important information: German evidence?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 334-344.
    6. P. Pablo Poveda-Orjuela & J. Carlos García-Díaz & Alexander Pulido-Rojano & Germán Cañón-Zabala, 2019. "ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.
    7. Shun Jia & Qinghe Yuan & Dawei Ren & Jingxiang Lv, 2017. "Energy Demand Modeling Methodology of Key State Transitions of Turning Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    8. José Rafael Lopes & Salvador Ávila & Ricardo Kalid & Jorge Laureano Moya Rodríguez, 2018. "Energy Efficiency Improvement in Non-Intensive Energy Enterprises: A Framework Proposal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Păunescu Carmen & Blid Laura, 2016. "Effective energy planning for improving the enterprise’s energy performance," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 512-531, September.
    10. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Staffan Waldo & Anton Paulrud, 2017. "Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fisheries: The Case of Multiple Regulatory Instruments in Sweden," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 275-295, October.
    12. Kumar, Satish & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2021. "Does geopolitical risk improve the directional predictability from oil to stock returns? Evidence from oil-exporting and oil-importing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. He, Yiqing & Ding, Xin & Yang, Chuchu, 2021. "Do environmental regulations and financial constraints stimulate corporate technological innovation? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Xu, Lei & Su, Jun, 2016. "From government to market and from producer to consumer: Transition of policy mix towards clean mobility in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 328-340.
    15. Filiou, Despoina & Kesidou, Effie & Wu, Lichao, 2023. "Are smart cities green? The role of environmental and digital policies for Eco-innovation in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Lahiani, Amine & Miloudi, Anthony & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2018. "New insights into the US stock market reactions to energy price shocks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 169-187.
    17. Hilde Nykamp, 2020. "Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Barbieri, Nicolò, 2015. "Investigating the impacts of technological position and European environmental regulation on green automotive patent activity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 140-152.
    19. Liudmyla Davydenko & Nina Davydenko & Andrii Bosak & Alla Bosak & Agnieszka Deja & Tygran Dzhuguryan, 2022. "Smart Sustainable Freight Transport for a City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Cluster: A Framework of the Energy Efficiency Monitoring of Electric Vehicle Fleet Charging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Faria, Lourenço Galvão Diniz & Andersen, Maj Munch, 2017. "Sectoral patterns versus firm-level heterogeneity - The dynamics of eco-innovation strategies in the automotive sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 266-281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1304-:d:106139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.