IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1120-d81858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Public Transport in Society—A Case Study of General Policy Documents in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Stjernborg

    (K2—The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport, Lund SE-22381, Sweden
    Department of Urban Studies, Faculty of Culture and Society, Malmö University, Malmö SE-20506, Sweden)

  • Ola Mattisson

    (K2—The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport, Lund SE-22381, Sweden
    Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management (LUSEM), Lund University, P.O. Box 7080, Lund SE-22007, Sweden)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study how local governments in Sweden view the role of public transport in society, and to investigate how public transport is used in a strategic capacity. By studying general policy documents, the ambition is to gain a wider understanding of the role of public transport based on the societal context it is situated in. Documents from 15 regions and 27 municipalities have been analysed by a qualitative content analysis. Results show that public transport is regarded as an important factor towards achieving other goals and other public values, particularly those related to economic and environmental issues; and that the social dimension is not as prioritised. Rail-bound public transport is often advocated, as are collaboration between organizations and integrated land-use and transport planning. However, the studied documents showed large overall differences in how counties and municipalities address public transport issues. It should be a priority in Sweden’s main steering documents to treat public transport consistently and give it the same priority as other societal functions—not least because Sweden’s treatment of public transport is a reasonable reflection of its overall society and can influence prioritisations and considerations in counties and municipalities across the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Stjernborg & Ola Mattisson, 2016. "The Role of Public Transport in Society—A Case Study of General Policy Documents in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1120-:d:81858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Transport problems that matter – social and psychological links to transport disadvantage," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 170-178.
    2. Robert Hrelja & Fredrik Pettersson & Stig Westerdahl, 2016. "The Qualities Needed for a Successful Collaboration: A Contribution to the Conceptual Understanding of Collaboration for Efficient Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Juan Pablo Bocarejo & Ingrid Portilla & David Meléndez, 2016. "Social fragmentation as a consequence of implementing a Bus Rapid Transit system in the city of Bogotá," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1617-1634, June.
    4. Jaramillo, Ciro & Lizárraga, Carmen & Grindlay, Alejandro Luis, 2012. "Spatial disparity in transport social needs and public transport provision in Santiago de Cali (Colombia)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 340-357.
    5. Kay, Andrew I. & Noland, Robert B. & DiPetrillo, Stephanie, 2014. "Residential property valuations near transit stations with transit-oriented development," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 131-140.
    6. Timothy J. Bartik, 2007. "Solving the Problems of Economic Development Incentives," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Ann Markusen (ed.), Reining in the Competition for Capital, chapter 5, pages 103-139, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    7. Moshe Givoni & James Macmillen & David Banister & Eran Feitelson, 2013. "From Policy Measures to Policy Packages," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Currie, Graham & Richardson, Tony & Smyth, Paul & Vella-Brodrick, Dianne & Hine, Julian & Lucas, Karen & Stanley, Janet & Morris, Jenny & Kinnear, Ray & Stanley, John, 2009. "Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne--Preliminary results," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 97-105, July.
    9. Erk P. Piening, 2013. "Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 209-245, February.
    10. Sue Llewellyn & Emma Tappin, 2003. "Strategy in the Public Sector: Management in the Wilderness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 955-982, June.
    11. Cervero, Robert & Kang, Chang Deok, 2011. "Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 102-116, January.
    12. Schwanen, Tim & Lucas, Karen & Akyelken, Nihan & Cisternas Solsona, Diego & Carrasco, Juan-Antonio & Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 123-135.
    13. Lucas, Karen, 2012. "Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 105-113.
    14. Jung Seung Lee & Soo Kyung Kim & Su-Yol Lee, 2016. "Sustainable Supply Chain Capabilities: Accumulation, Strategic Types and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Holmgren, Johan, 2014. "A strategy for increased public transport usage – The effects of implementing a welfare maximizing policy," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 221-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas, Neenu & Jana, Arnab & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2022. "Physical distancing on public transport in Mumbai, India: Policy and planning implications for unlock and post-pandemic period," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 217-236.
    2. Mehmet Angın & Shaban Ismael Albrka Ali & Hussin A. M. Yahia, 2024. "Determining Usage Intention for the Sustainability of Public Transport in Northern Cyprus Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Ghada Alturif & Wafaa Saleh, 2023. "Attitudes and Behaviour towards More Sustainable Travel Options in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An Emerging Social Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Willem Haanstra & Alberto Martinetti & Jan Braaksma & Leo van Dongen, 2020. "Design of a Framework for Integrating Environmentally Sustainable Design Principles and Requirements in Train Modernization Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Claudio Risso & Sergio Nesmachnow & Germán Faller, 2023. "Optimized Design of a Backbone Network for Public Transportation in Montevideo, Uruguay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Igor Betkier, 2020. "Safety of Urban Transport Users During the Covid-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 99-115.
    7. Estetiono, Andi & Badaruddin, Badaruddin & Asmirza, Moh. Sofian & Rujiman, Rujiman, 2018. "The Mediation Effect of Regional Development in Relationship Between Community Participation to Sustainable Transportation in The City of Medan, North Sumatra Indonesia," MPRA Paper 87763, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2018.
    8. Amelia Mutter, 2019. "Obduracy and Change in Urban Transport—Understanding Competition Between Sustainable Fuels in Swedish Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Vanessa Stjernborg, 2019. "Accessibility for All in Public Transport and the Overlooked (Social) Dimension—A Case Study of Stockholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Camille Kamga & Richard Kish & Sandeep Mudigonda & Rodrigue Tchamna, 2023. "Utilizing Social Media Data for Estimating Transit Performance Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Andi Estetiono & Badaruddin & Moh. Sofian Asmirza & Rujiman, 2018. "The Mediation Effect Of Regional Development In Relationship Between Community Participation To Sustainable Transportation In The City Of Medan, North Sumatra Indonesia," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 4(1), pages 54-72, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duvarci, Yavuz & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Mizokami, Shoshi, 2015. "Transportation disadvantage impedance indexing: A methodological approach to reduce policy shortcomings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 61-75.
    2. Rui Xiao & Guofeng Wang & Meng Wang, 2018. "Transportation Disadvantage and Neighborhood Sociodemographics: A Composite Indicator Approach to Examining Social Inequalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 29-43, May.
    3. Lucas, Karen & Bates, John & Moore, José & Carrasco, Juan Antonio, 2016. "Modelling the relationship between travel behaviours and social disadvantage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 157-173.
    4. Costa, Cayo & Ha, Jaehyun & Lee, Sugie, 2021. "Spatial disparity of income-weighted accessibility in Brazilian Cities: Application of a Google Maps API," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Pyrialakou, V. Dimitra & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D., 2016. "Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 252-269.
    6. Md. Kamruzzaman & Tan Yigitcanlar & Jay Yang & Mohd Afzan Mohamed, 2016. "Measures of Transport-Related Social Exclusion: A Critical Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Liu, Qiyang & Lucas, Karen & Marsden, Greg & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-62.
    8. Casas, Irene & Delmelle, Elizabeth C., 2014. "Identifying dimensions of exclusion from a BRT system in a developing country: a content analysis approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 228-237.
    9. Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan & Liv Rakel Øvstedal, 2020. "Functional requirements for inclusive transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1177-1198, June.
    10. Abbasi, Sorath & Ko, Joonho & Min, Jaehong, 2021. "Measuring destination-based segregation through mobility patterns: Application of transport card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Rozynek, Caroline & Schwerdtfeger, Stefanie & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2022. "The influence of limited financial resources on daily travel practices. A case study of low-income households with children in the Hanover Region (Germany)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Lades, Leonhard K. & Kelly, Andrew & Kelleher, Luke, 2020. "Why is active travel more satisfying than motorized travel? Evidence from Dublin," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 318-333.
    13. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Combs, Tabitha S., 2017. "Examining changes in travel patterns among lower wealth households after BRT investment in Bogotá, Colombia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 11-20.
    15. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Koomson, Isaac & Munyanyi, Musharavati Ephraim, 2023. "Transport poverty and obesity: The mediating roles of social capital and physical activity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 155-166.
    17. Karen Lucas & Ian Philips & Ersilia Verlinghieri, 2022. "A mixed methods approach to the social assessment of transport infrastructure projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 271-291, February.
    18. Lucas, Karen & Philips, Ian & Mulley, Corinne & Ma, Liang, 2018. "Is transport poverty socially or environmentally driven? Comparing the travel behaviours of two low-income populations living in central and peripheral locations in the same city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 622-634.
    19. José Renato Barandier & Milena Bodmer & Izabella Lentino, 2017. "Evidence of the impacts of the national housing programme on the accessibility of the low‐income population in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 105-118, May.
    20. Yi Fan & Ho Pin Teo & Wayne X. Wan, 2021. "Public transport, noise complaints, and housing: Evidence from sentiment analysis in Singapore," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 570-596, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1120-:d:81858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.