IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i7p8420-8436d51880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communicating Sustainable Shoes to Mainstream Consumers: The Impact of Advertisement Design on Buying Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjam Visser

    (Department of Design Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Valentin Gattol

    (Department of Product Innovation Management, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands
    Innovation Systems Department, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 2, 1210 Vienna, Austria)

  • Rosan Van der Helm

    (Department of Design Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Traditionally, marketing of sustainable products addresses green buyers, thus missing out on the mainstream consumers and volume necessary to cover the potentially higher cost of more sustainable materials. However, how to effectively communicate more sustainable products to mainstream consumers and to increase their buying intention is still underexplored. Combining personal and environmental benefits, called double benefit theory, is promoted as an effective green marketing strategy but so far not supported by quantitative research as being effective to reach mainstream consumers. We studied the effect of advertisement elements (layout color, benefit type, and heritage) on the products’ perceived sustainability, quality and fashion image, and buying intentions of mainstream consumers. Two hundred adults participated in a study that was based on a 2 (red vs. green layout) × 2 (personal vs. environmental benefit) × 2 (local vs. global heritage) between-subjects factorial design of a sustainable shoe advertisement. The impact of these independent variables on product image as well as on buying intention was analyzed by means of three-way ANOVAs. In line with the double benefit theory, combining a personal benefit with a green layout led to the highest buying intention. Moreover, a mediation analysis revealed the effect of emphasizing a personal benefit on buying intention was mediated by fashion image but not by sustainability. Sustainability, however, did have a positive effect on buying intentions independent of benefit type.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjam Visser & Valentin Gattol & Rosan Van der Helm, 2015. "Communicating Sustainable Shoes to Mainstream Consumers: The Impact of Advertisement Design on Buying Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8420-8436:d:51880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, James A., 1996. "Green Consumers in the 1990s: Profile and Implications for Advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 217-231, July.
    2. Ken Peattie, 2001. "Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 187-199, July.
    3. Seonaidh McDonald & Caroline J. Oates, 2006. "Sustainability: Consumer Perceptions and Marketing Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 157-170, May.
    4. van Doorn, Jenny & Verhoef, Peter C., 2011. "Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2020. "A United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Valentina Carfora & Patrizia Catellani, 2022. "Advertising Innovative Sustainable Fashion: Informational, Transformational, or Sustainability Appeal?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Mirjam Visser & Ab Stevels & Jan Schoormans, 2021. "Comparing the Recommendations of Buyers of Energy-Efficient and Inefficient Vacuum Cleaners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Chen Pang & Jie Zhou & Xiaofen Ji, 2022. "The Effects of Chinese Consumers’ Brand Green Stereotypes on Purchasing Intention toward Upcycled Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Rizomyliotis, Ioannis & Konstantoulaki, Kleopatra & Kostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Reassessing the effect of colour on attitude and behavioural intentions in promotional activities: The moderating role of mood and involvement," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 204-215.
    6. Caroline Oates & Panayiota Alevizou & Seonaidh McDonald, 2016. "Challenges for Marketers in Sustainable Production and Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-4, January.
    7. Chenxuan Hou & Emine Sarigöllü & Myung-Soo Jo & Dapeng Liang, 2018. "Stepping Outside the Self Promotes Pro-Environmental Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Scott & Caroline Oates & William Young, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework of the Adoption and Practice of Environmental Actions in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Teresa Smallbone, 2004. "Can ‘market transformation’ lead to ‘sustainable business’? A critical appraisal of the UK's strategy for sustainable business," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 96-106, March.
    3. Pamela Fuentes Resurreccion, 2015. "Cluster Analysis Approach to Understanding the Philippine Sustainable Consumer: An Initial Empirical Study," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 70-76.
    4. De Silva, Muthu & Wang, Pengji & Kuah, Adrian T.H., 2021. "Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 713-724.
    5. Christina Soyoung Song & Ji Young Lee & Renissa Mutha & Mijin Kim, 2023. "Frugal or Sustainable? The Interplay of Consumers’ Personality Traits and Self-Regulated Minds in Recycling Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. So-Yun Kim & Jungsung Yeo & Sang Sohn & Jong-Youn Rha & Shinae Choi & A-young Choi & Suhyun Shin, 2012. "Toward a Composite Measure of Green Consumption: An Exploratory Study Using a Korean Sample," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 199-214, June.
    7. Sütterlin, Bernadette & Brunner, Thomas A. & Siegrist, Michael, 2011. "Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 8137-8152.
    8. S.M. Fatah Uddin & Mohammed Naved Khan, 2016. "Green Purchasing Behaviour of Young Indian Consumers: An Exploratory Study," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(6), pages 1469-1479, December.
    9. Sukhbir Sandhu & Lucie K. Ozanne & Clive Smallman & Ross Cullen, 2010. "Consumer driven corporate environmentalism: Fact or fiction?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(6), pages 356-366, September.
    10. Deepti Jog & Divya Singhal, 2024. "Greenwashing Understanding Among Indian Consumers and Its Impact on Their Green Consumption," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 491-511, April.
    11. Panzone, Luca & Hilton, Denis & Sale, Laura & Cohen, Doron, 2016. "Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 77-95.
    12. Vinod Sharma & J. Sonwalkar & Maohar Kapse, 2013. "Consumer Purchase Behaviour for Green Products," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 50-65.
    13. Faiers, Adam & Cook, Matt & Neame, Charles, 2007. "Towards a contemporary approach for understanding consumer behaviour in the context of domestic energy use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4381-4390, August.
    14. Ali Razzaq & Nabeel Younus Ansari & Zohaib Razzaq & Hayat Muhammad Awan, 2018. "The Impact of Fashion Involvement and Pro-Environmental Attitude on Sustainable Clothing Consumption: The Moderating Role of Islamic Religiosity," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    15. Moser, Andrea K., 2016. "Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: An empirical analysis of German consumers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 389-397.
    16. Peter Oberhofer & Maria Dieplinger, 2014. "Sustainability in the Transport and Logistics Sector: Lacking Environmental Measures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 236-253, May.
    17. Farzana Quoquab & Azila Jaini & Jihad Mohammad, 2020. "Does It Matter Who Exhibits More Green Purchase Behavior of Cosmetic Products in Asian Culture? A Multi-Group Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Wheeler, Meagan & Sharp, Anne & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda, 2013. "The effect of ‘green’ messages on brand purchase and brand rejection," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 105-110.
    19. Andreas Niedermeier & Agnes Emberger‐Klein & Klaus Menrad, 2021. "Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast‐moving consumer goods in Germany?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1823-1838, May.
    20. Hsiu‐Yi Lin & Meng‐Hsiang Hsu, 2015. "Using Social Cognitive Theory to Investigate Green Consumer Behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 326-343, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8420-8436:d:51880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.