IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i3p1107-1128d33495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Indicator for Sustainability Rating in Suppliers of the Oil and Gas Industries in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • José Felipe Figueiredo Barata

    (Master in Management Systems MSG/LATEC, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Passo da Pátria 156, sala 329-A—Bloco E CEP 24210-240, Niterói—RJ, Brazil)

  • Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas

    (Master in Management Systems MSG/LATEC, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Passo da Pátria 156, sala 329-A—Bloco E CEP 24210-240, Niterói—RJ, Brazil)

  • Helder Gomes Costa

    (Master in Management Systems MSG/LATEC, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Passo da Pátria 156, sala 329-A—Bloco E CEP 24210-240, Niterói—RJ, Brazil)

  • Ruben Huamanchumo Gutierrez

    (Master in Management Systems MSG/LATEC, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Passo da Pátria 156, sala 329-A—Bloco E CEP 24210-240, Niterói—RJ, Brazil)

  • Valdir De Jesus Lameira

    (Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra INESC, Rua Antero de Quental, 199, Coimbra 3000-033, Portugal)

  • Marcelo J. Meiriño

    (Master in Management Systems MSG/LATEC, Federal Fluminense University, Rua Passo da Pátria 156, sala 329-A—Bloco E CEP 24210-240, Niterói—RJ, Brazil)

Abstract

The necessity of sustainability evaluation is rapidly growing alongside the expansion of civilization. Likewise, the supply chain suitability improvement is a need that has arisen in the petroleum industry, especially as it is responsible for the most part of CO 2 emissions in the atmosphere. The modeling of this kind of problem deals with multiple criteria evaluations. This paper proposes an original multiple-criteria based approach to classifying the degree of organizational sustainability. This proposal was applied to evaluate a representative set of companies, which are suppliers of the Brazilian petroleum industry. The data collection was supported by a questionnaire. The results highlight that the studied companies have not yet reached an advanced level of maturity in the sustainability context. In a comprehensive vision of sustainability based on Triple Bottom Line (TBL), these companies are either in the initial stage or in the implementation phase of the sustainability practices.

Suggested Citation

  • José Felipe Figueiredo Barata & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Helder Gomes Costa & Ruben Huamanchumo Gutierrez & Valdir De Jesus Lameira & Marcelo J. Meiriño, 2014. "Multi-Criteria Indicator for Sustainability Rating in Suppliers of the Oil and Gas Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:3:p:1107-1128:d:33495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/3/1107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/3/1107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Vanclay, 2004. "The Triple Bottom Line And Impact Assessment: How Do Tbl, Eia, Sia, Sea And Ems Relate To Each Other?," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 265-288.
    2. Haberl, Helmut & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Krausmann, Fridolin, 2001. "How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-45, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dolci, Décio Bittencourt & Lunardi, Guilherme Lerch & Salles, Ana Carolina & Alves, Ana Paula Ferreira, 2015. "Implementação da TI Verde nas organizações: uma visão estruturacional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 55(5), September.
    2. Mauro Lizot & Pedro Paulo Andrade Júnior & Flavio Trojan & Carolina Sales Magacho & Shirley Suellen Thesari & Andreia Santos Goffi, 2019. "Analysis of Evaluation Methods of Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Production Engineering Journals with High Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Nunzia Capobianco & Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Roberto Vona, 2021. "Toward a Sustainable Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in the Oil and Gas Industry: A PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Weizhang Liang & Guoyan Zhao & Suizhi Luo, 2021. "Sustainability evaluation for phosphorus mines using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12411-12433, August.
    5. Yazdi, Amir Karbassi & Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Hanne, Thomas & Abdi, Farshid & Sarfaraz, Amir Homayoun, 2022. "Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    7. Izabela Simon Rampasso & Osvaldo L. G. Quelhas & Rosley Anholon & Marcio B. Pereira & Jocimar D. A. Miranda & Wenderson S. Alvarenga, 2020. "Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: Evaluation Criteria for Brazilian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    8. E. Shvarts & A. Pakhalov & A. Knizhnikov & L. Ametistova, 2018. "Environmental rating of oil and gas companies in Russia: How assessment affects environmental transparency and performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1023-1038, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kastner, Thomas & Kastner, Michael & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2011. "Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1032-1040, April.
    2. Chen, B. & Chen, G.Q., 2007. "Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy--a case study of the Chinese society 1981-2001," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 355-376, March.
    3. Kander, Astrid & Warde, Paul & Teives Henriques, Sofia & Nielsen, Hana & Kulionis, Viktoras & Hagen, Sven, 2017. "International Trade and Energy Intensity During European Industrialization, 1870–1935," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 33-44.
    4. Arjun Kumar A. Rathi, 2023. "Integration of the Standalone ‘Risk Assessment’ Section in Project Level Environmental Impact Assessment Reports for Value Addition: An Indian Case Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Tello, Mario A., 2020. "Conceptualizing social impact: A geographic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 562-571.
    6. Cusso, Xavier & Garrabou, Ramon & Tello, Enric, 2006. "Social metabolism in an agrarian region of Catalonia (Spain) in 1860-1870: Flows, energy balance and land use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 49-65, June.
    7. Aleta Lederwasch & Pierre Mukheibir, 2013. "The Triple Bottom Line and Progress toward Ecological Sustainable Development: Australia’s Coal Mining Industry as a Case Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Broto, Vanesa Castán, 2017. "Energy landscapes and urban trajectories towards sustainability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 755-764.
    9. Shengyun Wang & Yaxin Zhang & Xingren Yao, 2021. "Research on Spatial Unbalance and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-23, September.
    10. White, Thomas J., 2007. "Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 402-410, December.
    11. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Lee, Sang Ho, 2014. "Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 100-114.
    12. Marie Sophie Hervieux & Olivier Darné, 2016. "Production and consumption-based approaches for the environmental Kuznets curve using ecological footprint," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 318-334, September.
    13. Browne, David & O'Regan, Bernadette & Moles, Richard, 2012. "Comparison of energy flow accounting, energy flow metabolism ratio analysis and ecological footprinting as tools for measuring urban sustainability: A case-study of an Irish city-region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-107.
    14. Ye-Ning Wang & Qiang Zhou & Hao-Wei Wang, 2020. "Assessing Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on a Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Yue, Dongxia & Xu, Xiaofeng & Hui, Cang & Xiong, Youcai & Han, Xuemei & Ma, Jinhui, 2011. "Biocapacity supply and demand in Northwestern China: A spatial appraisal of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 988-994, March.
    16. Shao, Ling & Wu, Zi & Chen, G.Q., 2013. "Exergy based ecological footprint accounting for China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 83-96.
    17. Yu Ding & Jian Peng, 2018. "Impacts of Urbanization of Mountainous Areas on Resources and Environment: Based on Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Hoekstra, A.Y., 2009. "Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1963-1974, May.
    19. Jin, Wei & Xu, Linyu & Yang, Zhifeng, 2009. "Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2938-2949, October.
    20. Xiaoman Liu & Dong Jiang & Qiao Wang & Huiming Liu & Jin Li & Zhuo Fu, 2016. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Nature Reserves Using an Ecological Footprint Method: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:3:p:1107-1128:d:33495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.