IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v3y2011i1p184-215d10916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Dynamics Modeling of Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries and Suggestions for Rebuilding Stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J. Garrity

    (Information Systems Department, Richard J. Wehle School of Business, Canisius College, 2001 Main St. Buffalo, New York, NY 14208, USA)

Abstract

This paper develops a system dynamics model of Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) systems in order to differentiate ITQ from total allowable catch (TAC) effects and to identify areas where policy changes and management improvement may be most effective. ITQ systems provide incentives for long-term stewardship but when fisheries are managed “at the edge,” the incentives are inadequate for stock rebuilding. The free-market design of ITQ systems means that fishermen may be in conflict with the long-run, public sustainability goals of fishery management. An adaptive control scheme with a contingent public/private transfer payment is proposed to improve long-term results for both the local community and the general public.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J. Garrity, 2011. "System Dynamics Modeling of Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries and Suggestions for Rebuilding Stocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:184-215:d:10916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/1/184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/1/184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jentoft, Svein, 2000. "The community: a missing link of fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 53-60, January.
    2. Sterman, J.D., 2006. "Learning from evidence in a complex world," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 505-514.
    3. Parzival Copes, 1986. "A Critical Review of the Individual Quota as a Device in Fisheries Management," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 62(3), pages 278-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erda Gercek & Monica Gambino & Loretta Malvarosa, 2022. "Understanding EU Fisheries Management Dynamics by Engaging Stakeholders through Online Group Model-Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Konrad, Renata A. & Saeed, Khalid & Kammer-Kerwick, Matt & Busaranuvong, Palawat & Khumwang, Wai, 2023. "“Fish-y” banks: Using system dynamics to evaluate policy interventions for reducing labor exploitation in the seafood industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Liu, Xin & Geng, Ruiying & Lv, Xin & Hu, Xiaoke & Do, Thang Nam & Liu, Meng, 2024. "From dynamics to sustainability: Modeling the shrimp (Penaeus chinensis) fishery in Shandong, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    4. Andres Camilo Castaño-Barreto & Carlos Alberto Jaramillo-Cruz & Raul Andres Molina Benavides & Alberto Stanislao Atzori, 2020. "Scenarios of Sustainable Fishing in the Zapatosa Marsh (Colombia) Simulated with a System Dynamics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Guyader, 2002. "Simulating the Effect of Regulatory Systems in a Fishery, An Application to the French Driftnet Albacore Fleet," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 23(1), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Sridharan, Sanjeev & Jones, Bobby & Caudill, Barry & Nakaima, April, 2016. "Steps towards incorporating heterogeneities into program theory: A case study of a data-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 88-97.
    3. Wenjing Luo & Zhi Qiu & Yurika Yokoyama & Shengyuan Zheng, 2022. "Decision-Making Mechanism of Joint Activities for the Elderly and Children in Integrated Welfare Facilities: A Discussion Based on “Motivation–Constraint” Interaction Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Christopher M. Anderson & Daniel S. Holland, 2006. "Auctions for Initial Sale of Annual Catch Entitlement," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(3), pages 333-352.
    5. Frank Jensen & Niels Vestergaard, 2002. "A Principal-Agent Analysis of Fisheries," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 158(2), pages 276-285, June.
    6. Kanchanaroek, Yingluk & Termansen, Mette & Quinn, Claire, 2013. "Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 363-373.
    7. Voyer, Michelle & Gollan, Natalie & Barclay, Kate & Gladstone, William, 2015. "‘It׳s part of me’; understanding the values, images and principles of coastal users and their influence on the social acceptability of MPAs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 93-102.
    8. repec:mpr:mprres:6558 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0218875 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Parzival Copes, 1999. "Sharing the Fishery Resources of the North Pacific for Mutual Advantage: Toward an International Management Regime," Discussion Papers dp00-08, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, revised Feb 2000.
    11. Nøstbakken, Linda, 2008. "Fisheries law enforcement--A survey of the economic literature," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 293-300, May.
    12. Bailey, Jennifer, 2016. "Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-27.
    13. Fina, Mark, 2003. "Can a novel management plan for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands crab fisheries succeed?," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22255, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Laurie Richmond & Robert Dumouchel & Henry Pontarelli & Laura Casali & Wyatt Smith & Kathryn Gillick & Pamela Godde & Michelle Dowling & Alyssa Suarez, 2019. "Fishing Community Sustainability Planning: A Roadmap and Examples from the California Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2017. "Quota flexibility in multi-species fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201707260700001026, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Parés, Claudio & Dresdner, Jorge & Salgado, Hugo, 2015. "Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 36-43.
    17. Colin W. Clark & Gordon R. Munro & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2010. "Limits to the Privatization of Fishery Resources," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 86(2), pages 209-218.
    18. Myrna Leticia Bravo-Olivas & Rosa María Chávez-Dagostino & Christopher D. Malcolm & Rodrigo Espinoza-Sánchez, 2015. "Notes on the Quality of Life of Artisanal Small-Scale Fishermen along the Pacific Coast of Jalisco, México," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Quérou, N. & Tomini, A., 2013. "Managing interacting species in unassessed fisheries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 192-201.
    20. Samvel, Gor & Matevosyan, Eleonora & Grigoryan-Hakhverdyan, Heghine & Geghamyan, Olimpia, 2025. "“De” centralization of natural resources and environmental governance in Armenia," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    21. Matthew A. Turner, 1998. "Optimal quota programs," Working Papers mturner-98-01, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    22. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:184-215:d:10916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.