IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4243-d1651025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Stakeholder and Organizational Influences on ESG Management in the Logistics Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Byung-Cheol Yoo

    (Department of Air Transportation and Logistics, Kyungwoon University, 730, Gangdong-ro, Sandong-eup, Gumi-si 39160, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

As the global emphasis on sustainability intensifies, logistics companies face mounting pressure from stakeholders to adopt environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. Despite this growing interest, few studies have investigated how both external pressures and internal organizational factors jointly influence ESG management and its outcomes in the logistics sector. This study aims to examine the effects of international, governmental, investor, and customer pressures on three ESG dimensions—environmental management, social responsibility, and governance practices. Furthermore, the study evaluates how these ESG dimensions affect corporate image and organizational performance. Data were collected from 352 logistics professionals through a structured online survey. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to test the proposed research model. The findings reveal that investor and customer pressures are the most influential drivers of comprehensive ESG engagement. As an internal factor, hierarchy culture significantly enhances organizational performance and strengthens the impact of corporate image on performance. Environmental and governance management contribute to both image and performance, while social responsibility primarily enhances corporate image. These results provide valuable insights for logistics companies and managers seeking to align ESG strategy with stakeholder expectations and operational excellence.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung-Cheol Yoo, 2025. "Exploring Stakeholder and Organizational Influences on ESG Management in the Logistics Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4243-:d:1651025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4243/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4243/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sol Kim & Geul Lee & Hyoung‐Goo Kang, 2021. "Risk management and corporate social responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 202-230, January.
    2. Linxuan Yu & Jing Xu & Xiang Yuan, 2024. "Sustainable Digital Shifts in Chinese Transport and Logistics: Exploring Green Innovations and Their ESG Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2013. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 1-33.
    4. Hyuck Jin Lee & Tae-hwan Rhee, 2023. "How Does Corporate ESG Management Affect Consumers’ Brand Choice?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Kais Bouslah & Abdelmajid Hmaittane & Lawrence Kryzanowski & Bouchra M’Zali, 2023. "CSR Structures: Evidence, Drivers, and Firm Value Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 115-145, June.
    6. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    7. Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Cohen, Alma, 2005. "The costs of entrenched boards," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 409-433, November.
    8. Anis Maaloul & Daniel Zéghal & Walid Ben Amar & Sari Mansour, 2023. "The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Disclosure on Cost of Debt: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Rocío Redondo Alamillos & Frédéric de Mariz, 2022. "How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Nguyen Van Tuan & Nguyen Anh Tuan, 2016. "Corporate Governance Structures And Performance Of Firms In Asian Markets: A Comparative Analysis Between Singapore And Vietnam," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(2).
    11. Stephen J. Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 435-455, May.
    12. Tai-Wei Chang & Yen-Li Yeh & Hung-Xin Li, 2020. "How to Shape an Organization’s Sustainable Green Management Performance: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Leogrande, Angelo, 2024. "Integrating ESG Principles into Smart Logistics: Toward Sustainable Supply Chains," MPRA Paper 122690, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    15. Stuart L. Hart & Gautam Ahuja, 1996. "Does It Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction And Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 30-37, March.
    16. Nie, Song & Liu, Junxian & Zeng, Gang & You, Jiyuan, 2023. "Local government debt pressure and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    17. Javier Martínez-Falcó & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Luis A. Millán-Tudela, 2025. "Unraveling the relationship between ESG strategy and sustainable performance in the Spanish wine industry: a structural equation analysis," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 962-986, January.
    18. Pratima Bansal, 2005. "Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 197-218, March.
    19. SiJian Niu & Byung Il Park & Jin Sup Jung, 2022. "The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Amin Chegenizadeh & Natasya Ghinna Humaira & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Hamid Nikraz, 2023. "Corporate Governance Research in Asian Countries: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis (2001–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    21. Yu-Shan Chen, 2010. "The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 307-319, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    2. Vicente Lima Crisóstomo & Priscila Azevedo Prudêncio & Isac Freitas Brandão, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 243-263, November.
    3. González, Maximiliano & Guzmán, Alexander & Pablo, Eduardo & Trujillo, María-Andrea, 2019. "Is board turnover driven by performance in family firms?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 169-186.
    4. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Kent Walker & Fang Wan, 2012. "The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 227-242, August.
    6. Dumitru-Nicusor CARAUSU, 2015. "Monitor And Control In Companies: An Agency Theory Approach," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 46-60, September.
    7. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & José Antonio Pérez-Aranda, 2019. "Consumers’ perceived corporate social responsibility evaluation and support: The moderating role of consumer information," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(4), pages 613-638, June.
    8. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    9. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    10. Rubén Chavarín, 2020. "Risk governance, banks affiliated to business groups, and foreign ownership," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    11. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    12. Greene, William H. & Hornstein, Abigail S. & White, Lawrence J., 2009. "Multinationals do it better: Evidence on the efficiency of corporations' capital budgeting," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 703-720, December.
    13. Nam Hoai Tran & Chi Dat Le & David McMillan, 2020. "Ownership concentration, corporate risk-taking and performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1732640-173, January.
    14. Kočenda, Evžen & Iwasaki, Ichiro, 2020. "Bank survival in Central and Eastern Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 860-878.
    15. Filatotchev, Igor & Poulsen, Annette & Bell, R. Greg, 2019. "Corporate governance of a multinational enterprise: Firm, industry and institutional perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Anderson, Anne & Gupta, Parveen P., 2009. "A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance: Do financial structure and the legal system matter?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 61-79.
    17. Wali Ullah, 2017. "Evolving corporate governance and firms performance: evidence from Japanese firms," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-33, February.
    18. Muhammad Yar Khan & Anam Javeed & Ly Kim Cuong & Ha Pham, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Cost of Capital: Evidence from Emerging Market," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-29, October.
    19. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    20. Reena Aggarwal & Isil Erel & René Stulz & Rohan Williamson, 2010. "Differences in Governance Practices between US and Foreign Firms: Measurement, Causes, and Consequences," NBER Chapters, in: Corporate Governance, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4243-:d:1651025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.