IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4125-d1648387.html

Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Industrial Heritage Value Evaluation Method and Reuse Research in Shaanxi Province—A Case Study of Shaanxi Steel Factory

Author

Listed:
  • Weiyu Lian

    (Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Branka Dimitrijević

    (Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

Abstract

Industrial heritage is relevant to social, cultural, scientific, technological, and architectural aspects, revealing the lifestyles of people, recording technological advances, and perpetuating cultures. However, with the renewal of cities, a large amount of industrial heritage has been abandoned. To avoid the waste of industrial heritage resources, a reasonable and accurate value evaluation of it is a prerequisite for its protection and reuse. Therefore, based on the perspective of value evaluation, this paper presents qualitative and quantitative research through a literature review and field research, combined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This study summarises industrial heritage value evaluation factors in Shaanxi and establishes a method for industrial heritage value evaluation. After considering factors such as industrial type, year, development process, surrounding environment, and remains, this study selected the industrial heritage of Shaanxi Steel Factory built in Xi’an in 1965 as a sample in order to verify the feasibility of the evaluation method, to provide theoretical guidance for subsequent conservation and reuse, and to serve as a reference for realising urban regeneration. The findings evidenced that the presented evaluation methodology is valid in evaluating the value of industrial heritage and that the AHP method is reliable in confirming the weights of the evaluation indicators. This study establishes an evaluation methodology for the value of industrial heritage, and studies on multiple criteria provide a series of auxiliary methods that reduce the uncertainty of evaluation and provide a new methodology for confirming the level of heritage protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiyu Lian & Branka Dimitrijević, 2025. "Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Industrial Heritage Value Evaluation Method and Reuse Research in Shaanxi Province—A Case Study of Shaanxi Steel Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-55, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4125-:d:1648387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    2. Francesca Nocca & Martina Bosone & Manuel Orabona, 2024. "Multicriteria Evaluation Framework for Industrial Heritage Adaptive Reuse: The Role of the ‘Intrinsic Value’," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Xie, Philip Feifan, 2015. "A life cycle model of industrial heritage development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 141-154.
    4. Md. Raquibuzzaman Khan & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Nazia Tabassum & Niaz Ahmed Khan, 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Delphi–AHP Method in Analyzing Challenges to Public-Sector Project Procurement and the Supply Chain: A Developing Country’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Chaoyu Mo & Lin Wang & Fujie Rao, 2022. "Typology, Preservation, and Regeneration of the Post-1949 Industrial Heritage in China: A Case Study of Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    7. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    8. Ting Fan & Dong Qian Xue, 2018. "Sustainable Development of Cultural Industry in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China: A SWOT and AHP Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Yiqing Zhao & Keyu Jin & Dingqing Zhang & Li Wang & Ji Li & Tianchen Dai, 2024. "Transforming Urban Landscapes: Reuse of Heritage Sites through Multi-Value Interpretations in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    11. Saaty, Thomas L. & Vargas, Luis G., 1987. "Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 107-117, October.
    12. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    13. Jiazhen Zhang & Jeremy Cenci & Vincent Becue & Sesil Koutra & Christos S. Ioakimidis, 2020. "Recent Evolution of Research on Industrial Heritage in Western Europe and China Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Loes Veldpaus & John Pendlebury, 2023. "Heritage as a Vehicle for Development: The Case of Bigg Market, Newcastle upon Tyne," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 376-390, May.
    15. Norman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer, 1963. "An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 458-467, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mar Arenas-Parra & Raquel Quiroga-García & Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2022. "An extended best–worst multiple reference point method: application in the assessment of non-life insurance companies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5323-5362, November.
    2. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2016. "Hesitant analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 602-614.
    4. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Chao‐Chung Ho & Chih Huang & Chung‐Ya Ou, 2018. "Analysis of the Factors influencing Sustainable Development in the Insurance Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 391-410, July.
    6. Misbah Anjum & Vernika Agarwal & P. K. Kapur & Sunil Kumar Khatri, 2020. "Two-phase methodology for prioritization and utility assessment of software vulnerabilities," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 289-300, July.
    7. Nastaran Goldani & Alessio Ishizaka, 2025. "A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making method and its application to healthcare waste treatment technology selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(1), pages 171-196, October.
    8. Çağlar Kıvanç Kaymaz & Salih Birinci & Yusuf Kızılkan, 2022. "Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2986-3012, March.
    9. Prommer, Lisa & Tiberius, Victor & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Exploring the future of startup leadership development," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    10. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    11. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Prianto Budi Saptono & Gustofan Mahmud & Intan Pratiwi & Dwi Purwanto & Ismail Khozen & Muhamad Akbar Aditama & Siti Khodijah & Maria Eurelia Wayan & Rina Yuliastuty Asmara & Ferry Jie, 2023. "Development of Climate-Related Disclosure Indicators for Application in Indonesia: A Delphi Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    14. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    15. Juuso Pajasmaa & Kaisa Miettinen & Johanna Silvennoinen, 2025. "Group Decision Making in Multiobjective Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 329-371, April.
    16. Di Zio, Simone & Bolzan, Mario & Marozzi, Marco, 2021. "Classification of Delphi outputs through robust ranking and fuzzy clustering for Delphi-based scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. Zeshui Xu, 2013. "Compatibility Analysis of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 463-482, May.
    18. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    19. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    20. Levary, Reuven R. & Wan, Ke, 1999. "An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 661-677, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4125-:d:1648387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.