IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3974-d1644815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflecting the Effect of Physical–Perceptual Components on Increasing the Anxiety of Inner-City Rail Transit’s Users: An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Toktam Hanaee

    (Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad 9187147578, Iran)

  • Iulian Dincă

    (Department of Geography, Tourism and Territorial Planning, Centre for Territorial Studies and Analysis, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Zohreh Moradi

    (Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad 9187147578, Iran)

  • Parinaz Sadegh Eghbali

    (Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad 9187147578, Iran)

  • Ali Boloor

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd 1477893855, Iran)

Abstract

As urbanization continues to expand, the design and structure of urban spaces increasingly influence the experiences of individuals, whether intentionally or inadvertently. These effects can result in both positive and negative experiences, with urban facilities generally designed to enhance the comfort and well-being of citizens. However, in certain cases, these spaces can provoke adverse emotional reactions, such as anxiety. Anxiety, a prevalent mental health disorder, is more commonly observed in urban environments than in rural areas. Among various urban settings, rail transport in large cities is often cited as one of the most stressful environments for passengers. In light of the significance of this issue, this study seeks to explore how physical and perceptual components can reduce anxiety and encourage greater use of intra-urban rail transportation. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, the study employed directional content analysis to investigate this topic. Data were collected and analyzed through an exploratory methodology with the assistance of MAXQDA software. The analysis began with guided content coding, drawing on theoretical frameworks pertinent to the research. Through this process, 2387 initial codes were identified, which were then categorized into nine main themes, with the relationships between these codes clarified. The findings were inductively derived from the raw data, leading to the development of a foundational theoretical framework. The study, employing a personalized strategy, identified three key factors that contribute to anxiety: physical, perceptual, and environmental components. Physical factors, such as accessibility, lighting, and signage, were found to have a significant impact on passengers’ psychological well-being. Perceptual factors, including personal perceptions, stress, and fear, played a crucial role in exacerbating anxiety. Additionally, environmental factors, particularly the design of metro networks, rail lines, and flexible transportation lines, such as car-sharing and micromobility, were found to significantly contribute to the overall anxiety experienced by passengers. Moreover, the study suggests that anxiety triggers can be mitigated effectively through the implementation of well-designed policies and management practices. Enhancing the sense of security within transit spaces was found to increase citizens’ willingness to utilize rail transportation. These findings indicate that targeted interventions aimed at improving both the physical and perceptual aspects of the transit environment could enhance the commuter experience and, in turn, foster greater use of rail systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Toktam Hanaee & Iulian Dincă & Zohreh Moradi & Parinaz Sadegh Eghbali & Ali Boloor, 2025. "Reflecting the Effect of Physical–Perceptual Components on Increasing the Anxiety of Inner-City Rail Transit’s Users: An Integrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-34, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3974-:d:1644815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Nisco, Alessandro & Warnaby, Gary, 2014. "Urban design and tenant variety influences on consumers' emotions and approach behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 211-217.
    2. Jiuping Xu & Jing Yang & Liming Yao, 2012. "Transportation Structure Analysis Using SD-MOP in World Modern Garden City: A Case Study in China," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-23, November.
    3. Fotios Zantalis & Grigorios Koulouras & Sotiris Karabetsos & Dionisis Kandris, 2019. "A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Soto, Jose & Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio & Useche, Sergio A., 2022. "Public transportation and fear of crime at BRT Systems: Approaching to the case of Barranquilla (Colombia) through integrated choice and latent variable models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 142-160.
    5. Haywood, Luke & Koning, Martin & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2017. "Crowding in public transport: Who cares and why?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 215-227.
    6. Chowdhury, Subeh & van Wee, Bert, 2020. "Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 102-108.
    7. Luhui Qi & Liqi Jia & Yubin Luo & Yuanyi Chen & Minggang Peng, 2022. "The External Characteristics and Mechanism of Urban Road Corridors to Agglomeration: Case Study for Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Sigma Dolins & Helena Strömberg & Yale Z. Wong & MariAnne Karlsson, 2021. "Sharing Anxiety Is in the Driver’s Seat: Analyzing User Acceptance of Dynamic Ridepooling and Its Implications for Shared Autonomous Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Wang, Bin & Zacharias, John, 2020. "Noise, odor and passenger density in perceived crowding in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 215-223.
    10. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Iztok Podbregar, 2021. "Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Tyrinopoulos, Yannis & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2008. "Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 260-272, July.
    12. Tünde Zita Kovács & András Nábrádi & Szabolcs Tóth & László Huzsvai & Adrián Nagy & Beáta Bittner, 2023. "Sustainable Public Transportation in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous (VUCA) Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Mahbubur Meenar & Bradley Flamm & Kevin Keenan, 2019. "Mapping the Emotional Experience of Travel to Understand Cycle-Transit User Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A., 2011. "Crowding and public transport: A review of willingness to pay evidence and its relevance in project appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 880-887, November.
    15. Yasmin A Altwaijri & Abdullah S Al-Subaie & AbdulHameed Al-Habeeb & Sandro Galea & Marya Akkad & Mohammad Talal Naseem & Lisa Bilal, 2023. "Urbanization and mental health: A perspective from Riyadh City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(5), pages 1121-1133, August.
    16. Yung-Hsiang Cheng, 2010. "Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 875-896, November.
    17. Frauke Behrendt, 2019. "Cycling the Smart and Sustainable City: Analyzing EC Policy Documents on Internet of Things, Mobility and Transport, and Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, February.
    18. Liu Yang & Koen H. van Dam & Lufeng Zhang, 2020. "Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-34, November.
    19. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Yoshitsugu Hayashi, 2024. "An Integrative Investigation of Travel Satisfaction, Streetscape Perception, and Mental Health in Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Claudia Caballini & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Valentina Costa & Ilaria Delponte & Erika Olivari, 2022. "Assessing the Feasibility of MaaS: A Contribution from Three Italian Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luan, Xiaojie & Corman, Francesco, 2022. "Passenger-oriented traffic control for rail networks: An optimization model considering crowding effects on passenger choices and train operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 239-272.
    2. Kapatsila, Bogdan & Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J. & van Lierop, Dea & Grisé, Emily, 2023. "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the comfort of riding a crowded bus in Metro Vancouver, Canada," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 83-96.
    3. Bouscasse, Hélène & de Lapparent, Matthieu, 2019. "Perceived comfort and values of travel time savings in the Rhône-Alpes Region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 370-387.
    4. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Wang, Bin & Zacharias, John, 2020. "Noise, odor and passenger density in perceived crowding in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 215-223.
    6. Ittamalla, Rajesh & Srinivas Kumar, Daruri Venkata, 2021. "Determinants of holistic passenger experience in public transportation: Scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Vania Ceccato & Nathan Gaudelet & Gabin Graf, 2022. "Crime and safety in transit environments: a systematic review of the English and the French literature, 1970–2020," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 105-153, March.
    8. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang & Chen, Ssu-Yun, 2015. "Perceived accessibility, mobility, and connectivity of public transportation systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 386-403.
    9. Tirachini, Alejandro & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Dekker, Thijs & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2017. "Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: Results from Santiago de Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 311-326.
    10. Márquez, Luis & Alfonso A, Julieth V. & Poveda, Juan C., 2019. "In-vehicle crowding: Integrating tangible attributes, attitudes, and perceptions in a choice context between BRT and metro," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 452-465.
    11. Haywood, Luke & Koning, Martin & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2017. "Crowding in public transport: Who cares and why?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 215-227.
    12. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Cats, Oded, 2019. "The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 83-93.
    13. Puteri Paramita & Zuduo Zheng & Md Mazharul Haque & Simon Washington & Paul Hyland, 2018. "User satisfaction with train fares: A comparative analysis in five Australian cities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    15. Liu, Peng & Liu, Jielun & Ong, Ghim Ping & Tian, Qiong, 2020. "Flow pattern and optimal capacity in a bi-modal traffic corridor with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Jenelius, Erik, 2018. "Public transport experienced service reliability: Integrating travel time and travel conditions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 275-291.
    17. Zhang, Junlin & Yang, Hai & Lindsey, Robin & Li, Xinwei, 2020. "Modeling and managing congested transit service with heterogeneous users under monopoly," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 249-266.
    18. Ulak, Mehmet Baran & Yazici, Anil & Aljarrah, Mohammad, 2020. "Value of convenience for taxi trips in New York City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 85-100.
    19. Iglesias, Vicente & Raveau, Sebastián, 2024. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on crowding aversion in public transport and transport mode choice: The case of Santiago, Chile," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 167-174.
    20. Wang, Jing-Peng & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "Tradable OD-based travel permits for bi-modal traffic management with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 589-605.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3974-:d:1644815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.