Author
Listed:
- Paula Carvalho Pereda
(Department of Economics, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)
- Andrea Lucchesi
(School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 03838-000, Brazil)
- Thais Diniz Oliveira
(Department of Economics, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
Department of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)
- Rayan Wolf
(Department of Economics, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056, USA)
- Crístofer Hood Marques
(School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande 96203-900, Brazil)
- Luiz Felipe Assis
(Ocean Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)
- Jean-David Caprace
(Ocean Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil)
Abstract
Maritime transport carries over 80% of global trade by volume and remains the most energy-efficient mode for long-distance goods movement. However, the sector contributes approximately 3% of global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, a share that could rise to 17% by 2050 without effective regulation. In response, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has introduced initial and short-term measures to enhance energy efficiency and reduce emissions. In 2023, IMO Strategy expanded on these efforts with medium-term measures, including Market-Based Mechanisms (MBMs) such as a GHG levy, a feebate system, and fuel intensity regulations combined with carbon pricing. This study evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of these measures using an integrated computational simulation model that combines Ocean Engineering and Economics. Our results indicate that all proposed measures support the IMO’s intermediate emission reduction targets through 2035, cutting absolute emissions by more than 50%. However, economic impacts vary significantly across regions, with most of Africa, Asia, and South America experiencing the greatest adverse effects on GDP and trade. Among the measures, the GHG levy exerts the strongest pressure on economic activity and food prices, while a revised fuel intensity mechanism imposes lower costs, particularly in the short term. Revenue redistribution mitigates GDP losses but does so unevenly across regions. By leveraging a general equilibrium model (GTAP) to capture indirect effects often overlooked in prior studies, this analysis provides a comprehensive comparison of policy impacts. The findings underscore the need for equitable and pragmatic decarbonization strategies in the maritime sector, contributing to ongoing IMO policy discussions.
Suggested Citation
Paula Carvalho Pereda & Andrea Lucchesi & Thais Diniz Oliveira & Rayan Wolf & Crístofer Hood Marques & Luiz Felipe Assis & Jean-David Caprace, 2025.
"Sustainable Shipping: Modeling Economic and Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Decarbonization Policies (Part II),"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-26, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3765-:d:1639539
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3765-:d:1639539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.