IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3728-d1638776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on the Similarity of Sustainability Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Yiying Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Derek D. Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Rongxuan Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

Digital technology has transformed sustainability reporting practices, creating both opportunities and homogenization risks. This study analyzes 9903 sustainability reports from Chinese listed companies (2009–2021) through cosine similarity analysis. It reveals high intercorporate similarity (mean = 0.776). Fixed-effects modeling demonstrates that digital adoption increases report similarity, while analyst scrutiny and innovation capacity significantly mitigate this convergence effect. The findings suggest that digital tools promote isomorphic disclosure patterns through template-driven reporting. However, market monitoring (analyst attention) and R&D investment counterbalance this trend by incentivizing unique environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. This study offers novel insights into information asymmetry theory and social learning theory. The increased similarity in reporting will lead to standardization among Chinese companies, thereby enhancing their comparability in the international market. This will not only help Chinese companies improve their performance assessments for global investors but also facilitate cross-border investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiying Wang & Derek D. Wang & Rongxuan Liu, 2025. "Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on the Similarity of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3728-:d:1638776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3728/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3728/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3728-:d:1638776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.