IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3728-d1638776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on the Similarity of Sustainability Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Yiying Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Derek D. Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Rongxuan Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

Digital technology has transformed sustainability reporting practices, creating both opportunities and homogenization risks. This study analyzes 9903 sustainability reports from Chinese listed companies (2009–2021) through cosine similarity analysis. It reveals high intercorporate similarity (mean = 0.776). Fixed-effects modeling demonstrates that digital adoption increases report similarity, while analyst scrutiny and innovation capacity significantly mitigate this convergence effect. The findings suggest that digital tools promote isomorphic disclosure patterns through template-driven reporting. However, market monitoring (analyst attention) and R&D investment counterbalance this trend by incentivizing unique environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. This study offers novel insights into information asymmetry theory and social learning theory. The increased similarity in reporting will lead to standardization among Chinese companies, thereby enhancing their comparability in the international market. This will not only help Chinese companies improve their performance assessments for global investors but also facilitate cross-border investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiying Wang & Derek D. Wang & Rongxuan Liu, 2025. "Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on the Similarity of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3728-:d:1638776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3728/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3728/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Gray & Reza Kouhy & Simon Lavers, 1995. "Corporate social and environmental reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 47-77, May.
    2. Lo, Kin & Ramos, Felipe & Rogo, Rafael, 2017. "Earnings management and annual report readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-25.
    3. Mu, Weiwei & Liu, Kefu & Tao, Yunqing & Ye, Yongwei, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Li, Quan & Chen, Huimin & Chen, Yang & Xiao, Tong & Wang, Li, 2023. "Digital economy, financing constraints, and corporate innovation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Xu, Duo & Huang, Junkai & Ren, Xingzi & Ye, Mingyu, 2024. "ESG report textual similarity and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Zhuo Huang & Yunqing Tao & Xin Luo & Yongwei Ye & Tianyi Lei, 2023. "Regional digital finance and corporate investment efficiency in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(43), pages 5115-5134, September.
    7. Sylvia Novillo-Villegas & Patricia Acosta-Vargas & Christian Cruz-Boada & Mateo Garzon & Andre Marin-Dett & Wendy Anzules-Falcones, 2022. "Sustaining the Path for Innovation Capability from a Developing Country Perspective: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, October.
    8. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570610709872 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Andrea Urbinati & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, 2023. "Assessing the interplay between Open Innovation and Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1078-1095, July.
    10. Bolton, Patrick & Kacperczyk, Marcin, 2021. "Do investors care about carbon risk?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 517-549.
    11. Rob Gray, 2006. "Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(6), pages 793-819, November.
    12. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2022. "Sustainability and the Digital Transition: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Christoph Mauritz & Martin Nienhaus & Christopher Oehler, 2023. "The role of individual audit partners for narrative disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-44, March.
    14. Borochin, Paul A. & Cicon, James E. & DeLisle, R. Jared & Price, S. McKay, 2018. "The effects of conference call tones on market perceptions of value uncertainty," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 75-91.
    15. Diamond, Douglas W, 1985. "Optimal Release of Information by Firms," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(4), pages 1071-1094, September.
    16. P. Raghavendra Rau & Ting Yu, 2023. "A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 3-33, January.
    17. Karlilar, Selin & Balcilar, Mehmet & Emir, Firat, 2023. "Environmental sustainability in the OECD: The power of digitalization, green innovation, renewable energy and financial development," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    18. Gerard Hoberg & Gordon Phillips, 2016. "Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(5), pages 1423-1465.
    19. Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat & Noor Hidayah Ab Aziz & Mushtaq Yousif Alhasnawi & Esraa Esam Alharasis & Fatima Al Qadi & Hamzeh Al Amosh, 2024. "The Role of Digital Technologies in Corporate Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Agenda," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, November.
    20. Fang, Zhen & Razzaq, Asif & Mohsin, Muhammad & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "Spatial spillovers and threshold effects of internet development and entrepreneurship on green innovation efficiency in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    21. Amihud, Yakov & Mendelson, Haim, 1986. "Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 223-249, December.
    22. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579510146996 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2011. "When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 35-65, February.
    24. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    25. Sun, Guanglin & Li, Ting & Ai, Yongfang & Li, Qinghai, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate financial fraud," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiying Wang & Derek D. Wang, 2025. "The Dual Path of the Impact of Digital Technology Adoption on ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Wenjuan Su & Jiyu Yu & Lingyun Zhao, 2025. "Can Sci-Tech Finance Policy Boost Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from the Pilot Experiment of Promoting the Integration of Technology and Finance in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Yan Yao & Zihong Ma, 2025. "Will Digital Inclusive Finance Improve the Quality and Quantity of SMEs’ Green Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Yunfu Zhu & Haoling Yang & Ma Zhong, 2023. "Do ESG Ratings of Chinese Firms Converge or Diverge? A Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Domestic and International Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    6. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Huang, Zhongwei & Moldovan, Rucsandra, 2021. "Wall Street analysts as investor relations officers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. DeLisle, R. Jared & Grant, Andrew & Mao, Ruiqi, 2024. "Does environmental and social performance affect pricing efficiency? Evidence from earnings conference call tones," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Lei, Hao & Gao, Renyuan & Ning, Chutong & Sun, Guanglin, 2025. "Green finance and corporate green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Loukil, Nadia & Yousfi, Ouidad, 2010. "Firm's information environment and stock liquidity: evidence from Tunisian context," MPRA Paper 28699, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2011.
    10. Riccardo Rebonato & Dherminder Kainth & Lionel Melin, 2025. "The Impact of Physical Climate Risk on the Valuation of Global Equity Assets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(4), pages 857-894, April.
    11. Kirtac, Kemal & Germano, Guido, 2024. "Sentiment trading with large language models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    12. Chris Florackis & Christodoulos Louca & Roni Michaely & Michael Weber, 2023. "Cybersecurity Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 351-407.
    13. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    14. Ariadna Dumitrescu & Jordi Caballé, 2016. "Disclosure of Corporate Tax Reports, Tax Enforcement, and Insider Trading," Working Papers 911, Barcelona School of Economics.
    15. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Wang, Sumingyue & Wang, Xinlu & Xu, Liang, 2023. "Debt maturity structure and the quality of risk disclosures," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    18. Jana P. Fidrmuc & Tereza Tykvova, 2023. "Are Acquirer Shareholders Happier when Their Industries Are Unhappy?," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-52, Swiss Finance Institute.
    19. Meg Adachi-Sato & Hiroshi Osano, 2023. "Sustainable Investing Under Delegated Investment Management," Discussion Paper Series DP2023-01, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Nov 2024.
    20. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3728-:d:1638776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.