IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3524-d1634737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Sustainable Global Marketing Channels: Exploring the Role of Inter-Organizational Trust and Performance Metrics in the Age of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Matti Haverila

    (Marketing Department, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada)

  • Jenny Carita Twyford

    (Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester M15 6PB, UK)

  • Nashwa Nader

    (LSBU Business School, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK)

Abstract

This research explores the interaction between inter-organizational trust, marketing channels, and market and financial performance (FP) in establishing sustainable global marketing channels using Industry 4.0 technologies. It is conducted within the relational exchange theory (RET) framework and transaction cost economics (TCE). The sample (N = 131) was collected through the marketing research firm Centiment. PLS-SEM and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) were utilized as statistical methods. All hypotheses except the relationship between marketing channel operational performance and FP were accepted. This research highlights the vital role of inter-organizational trust in enhancing operational efficiency, profitability, and sustainability. It finds that trust fosters collaboration in global distribution channels, improving performance across multiple dimensions. Specifically, trust positively impacts marketing channel operations, boosting market performance. Nevertheless, all exogenous constructs were essential—“must-have” conditions for the endogenous FP construct. Applying the novel NCA is distinctive, primarily as it demonstrates that the relationship between marketing channel operational performance and FP is a necessary “must-have” condition, despite the insignificant path coefficient between the constructs. This is a crucial finding, as further investment in marketing channel operational performance and other antecedents of FP may be futile if the necessary conditions have not been met.

Suggested Citation

  • Matti Haverila & Jenny Carita Twyford & Nashwa Nader, 2025. "Building Sustainable Global Marketing Channels: Exploring the Role of Inter-Organizational Trust and Performance Metrics in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3524-:d:1634737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T.C.E. & Lun, Y.H. Venus, 2015. "The role of IT-enabled collaborative decision making in inter-organizational information integration to improve customer service performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 56-65.
    2. Jeff Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2011. "The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relations in the US, Japan, and Korea: A retrospective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 28-34, January.
    3. Youn Kue Na & Sungmin Kang & Hye Yeon Jeong, 2019. "The Effect of Market Orientation on Performance of Sharing Economy Business: Focusing on Marketing Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Jeffrey H Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2011. "The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 10-27, January.
    5. Tsan‐Ming Choi & Subodha Kumar & Xiaohang Yue & Hau‐Ling Chan, 2022. "Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 9-31, January.
    6. Riccardo Brozzi & David Forti & Erwin Rauch & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "The Advantages of Industry 4.0 Applications for Sustainability: Results from a Sample of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Gligor, David & Gligor, Nichole & Maloni, Michael, 2019. "The impact of the supplier's market orientation on the customer market orientation-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 81-93.
    9. Sini Laari & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2018. "The effect of a competitive strategy and green supply chain management on the financial and environmental performance of logistics service providers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 872-883, November.
    10. Lumineau, Fabrice & Jin, Jason Lu & Sheng, Shibin & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2022. "Asset specificity asymmetry and supplier opportunism in buyer–supplier exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 85-100.
    11. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie J. Li, 2016. "When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 724-741, April.
    12. Ellen Lau & Steve Rowlinson, 2009. "Interpersonal trust and inter-firm trust in construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 539-554.
    13. Frances Turner & Aurélie Merle & David Gotteland, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Post-Print hal-04752663, HAL.
    14. Turner, Frances & Merle, Aurélie & Gotteland, David, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 473-483.
    15. Jing Yi Yong & Mohd‐Yusoff Yusliza & Thurasamy Ramayah & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Simone Sehnem & Venkatesh Mani, 2020. "Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 212-228, January.
    16. Frances Turner & Aurélie Merle & David Gotteland, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04752663, HAL.
    17. Judit Oláh & Yusmar Ardhi Hidayat & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Morshadul Hasan & József Popp, 2021. "Inter-Organizational Trust on Financial Performance: Proposing Innovation as a Mediating Variable to Sustain in a Disruptive Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ettis, Saïd Aboubaker & Sellami, Achraf, 2025. "“I'll do it for myself†: Enhancing customer value through online product customization experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Sreenivasan Jayashree & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Chinnasamy Agamudai Nambi Malarvizhi & Hesti Maheswari & Zohre Hosseini & Azilah Kasim, 2021. "The Impact of Technological Innovation on Industry 4.0 Implementation and Sustainability: An Empirical Study on Malaysian Small and Medium Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Xue, Jinjie & Liu, Junqi & Geng, Zizhen & Yuan, Hongping & Chao, Lei, 2023. "Why and when do paradoxical management capabilities matter to paradoxical pressure? An empirical investigation of the role of coopetition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Ali, Tahir & Khalid, Saba & Shahzad, Khuram & Larimo, Jorma, 2021. "Managing international joint ventures to improve performance: The role of structural and social mechanisms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    5. Yi Wang & Xianfang Xue & Han Guo, 2022. "The Sustainability of Market Orientation from a Dynamic Perspective: The Mediation of Dynamic Capability and the Moderation of Error Management Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Shawn A. Trivette, 2017. "Invoices on scraps of paper: trust and reciprocity in local food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 529-542, September.
    7. Paul Brockman & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Ying Zheng, 2022. "Does social trust affect international contracting? Evidence from foreign bond covenants," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1011-1044, August.
    8. Carole Couper & A. Rebecca Reuber & Shameen Prashantham, 2020. "Lost that lovin’ feeling: The erosion of trust between small, high-distance partners," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(3), pages 326-352, April.
    9. Bidault, Francis & de la Torre, José R. & Zanakis, Stelios H. & Ring, Peter Smith, 2018. "Willingness to rely on trust in global business collaborations: Context vs. demography," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 373-391.
    10. Zhang, Chun & Henke, John W. & Viswanathan, Sridhar, 2015. "Reciprocity between buyer cost sharing and supplier technology sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 61-70.
    11. Paul Brockman & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Ying Zheng, 0. "Does social trust affect international contracting? Evidence from foreign bond covenants," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-34.
    12. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Radosław Wolniak, 2020. "Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Xusen Cheng & Liyang Qiao & Bo Yang & Ruixue Han, 2025. "To trust or not to trust: a qualitative study of older adults’ online communication during the COVID-19 pandemic," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 849-878, April.
    14. Ali, Tahir & Larimo, Jorma, 2016. "Managing opportunism in international joint ventures: The role of structural and social mechanisms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 86-96.
    15. Joan Torrent‐Sellens & Pilar Ficapal‐Cusí & Mihaela Enache‐Zegheru, 2023. "Boosting environmental management: The mediating role of Industry 4.0 between environmental assets and economic and social firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 753-768, January.
    16. Adriana Troczinski Storti & Ely Paiva & Luciana Marques Vieira, 2018. "Internationalization and Relationships in Supply Chains," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(6), pages 551-567, November.
    17. Chen, Yi-Su & Su, Hung-Chung & Ro, Young K., 2017. "The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 245-255.
    18. Khalid, Saba & Ali, Tahir, 2017. "An integrated perspective of social exchange theory and transaction cost approach on the antecedents of trust in international joint ventures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 491-501.
    19. Liew, Millie & Cao, June, 2024. "Green supply chain management for carbon accountability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Ming-Jer Chen & Danny Miller, 2015. "Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 758-775, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3524-:d:1634737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.