IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3487-d1634116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Sustainability of E-Learning with Adoption of M-Learning in Business Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Parusheva

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Economics—Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Irena Sisovska Klancnik

    (Department of E-Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Samo Bobek

    (Department of E-Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Simona Sternad Zabukovsek

    (Department of E-Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

The rapid development of information technologies has significantly transformed education, making digital tools and e-learning platforms essential for modern learning processes. This research study examines mobile learning (m-learning) adoption among higher education students, emphasising the importance of user acceptance for implementing mobile technologies in education. Using a research model based on the UTAUT framework and analysed via PLS–SEM, the research study investigates business students’ behavioural intention to adopt m-learning platforms (in our case, Microsoft Teams), offering valuable insights into their efficacy and long-term viability, explicitly focusing on the use of mobile devices and the mobile version of the Microsoft Teams application for educational purposes. The study’s findings indicate that all four examined factors significantly influence students’ behavioural intention to adopt m-learning applications, with “performance expectancy” having the most substantial impact. The survey highlights the sustained importance of m-learning even after the pandemic. These results reinforce that students’ expectations of improved performance play a crucial role in adopting mobile apps for m-learning. The findings also suggest that increasing adoption rates requires improving system usability, minimising reliance on external support through intuitive design and training, and leveraging peer influence to enhance engagement in m-learning environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Parusheva & Irena Sisovska Klancnik & Samo Bobek & Simona Sternad Zabukovsek, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainability of E-Learning with Adoption of M-Learning in Business Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-38, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3487-:d:1634116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristian Timbi-Sisalima & Mary Sánchez-Gordón & José Ramón Hilera-Gonzalez & Salvador Otón-Tortosa, 2022. "Quality Assurance in E-Learning: A Proposal from Accessibility to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Heena Choudhary & Naim Ahmad & Jarallah Alqahtani & Adel Ibrahim Qahmash, 2023. "Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Rana Saeed Al-Maroof & Khadija Alhumaid & Iman Akour & Said Salloum, 2021. "Factors That Affect E-Learning Platforms after the Spread of COVID-19: Post Acceptance Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    6. Uroš Zabukovšek & Polona Tominc & Samo Bobek, 2023. "Business IT Alignment Impact on Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-37, August.
    7. Simona Sternad Zabukovšek & Samo Bobek & Uroš Zabukovšek & Zoran Kalinić & Polona Tominc, 2022. "Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems’ Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Anatolijs Zabasta & Volodymyr Kazymyr & Oleksandr Drozd & Sammy Verslype & Ludovic Espeel & Rasa Bruzgiene, 2024. "Development of Shared Modeling and Simulation Environment for Sustainable e-Learning in the STEM Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Anjum Razzaque, 2020. "M-Learning Improves Knowledge Sharing Over e-Learning Platforms to Build Higher Education Students’ Social Capital," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    3. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    4. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    5. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Maruping, Likoebe M. & Brown, Susan A., 2006. "Role of time in self-prediction of behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 160-176, July.
    6. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    7. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.
    8. Fernanda Leão Ramos & Jorge Brantes Ferreira & Angilberto Sabino de Freitas & Juliana Werneck Rodrigues, 2018. "The Effect of Trust in the Intention to Use m-banking," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 175-191, March.
    9. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    11. Chia-Chien Hsu & Brian Sandford & Chia-Ju Ling & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Can the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Help Explain Subjective Well-Being in Senior Citizens due to Gateball Participation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Meng, Bo & Choi, Kyuhwan, 2016. "The role of authenticity in forming slow tourists' intentions: Developing an extended model of goal-directed behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 397-410.
    13. Shahida Saheb Shaiku, 2025. "Perceptions and motivating elements of bank customers for adoption of interest-free banking services: commercial bank of Ethiopia case," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Bireswar Dutta & Hsin-Ginn Hwang, 2021. "Consumers Purchase Intentions of Green Electric Vehicles: The Influence of Consumers Technological and Environmental Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Junmin Lee & Keungoui Kim & Hyunha Shin & Junseok Hwang, 2018. "Acceptance Factors of Appropriate Technology: Case of Water Purification Systems in Binh Dinh, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    17. Mei-Fang Chen & Ching-Ti Pan & Ming-Chuan Pan, 2009. "The Joint Moderating Impact of Moral Intensity and Moral Judgment on Consumer’s Use Intention of Pirated Software," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 361-373, December.
    18. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    19. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    20. Peng Shi & Frank Vanclay & Jin Yu, 2022. "Post-Resettlement Support Policies, Psychological Factors, and Farmers’ Homestead Exit Intention and Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3487-:d:1634116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.