IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3458-d1633746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Digital Transformation and the Innovation Model of SMMEs: The Case Study of PAYA

Author

Listed:
  • Yanmei Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Yanan Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Xiang Li

    (Business School, Department of Economics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Ziqiang Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Qiwen Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has prompted many enterprises to carry out digital transformation. For SMMEs (small- and medium-sized equipment manufacturing enterprises), digital transformation is not only a necessary measure to deal with changes in the external environment but also a key opportunity to stimulate the vitality of internal innovation. At the same time, the digital transformation of SMMEs and a series of innovation activities caused by it, as well as the various innovation models that have evolved from it, are closely related to managerial cognition. On the premise that digital transformation is regarded as an enterprise innovation activity, this study discusses the ways in which digital transformation drives the innovation model of SMMEs. Taking PAYA as the research object, combined with the theory of resource orchestration, this study adopts the longitudinal single-case study method to explore the connotation and operation logic of the SMME innovation model and constructs a theoretical “digital transformation-innovation-innovation” model. The key findings of the research are as follows: Firstly, innovation models experience a phased evolution. Digital transformation promotes the innovation of SMMEs through three stages: digital technology structuring single-agent innovation, digital technology bundling dual-agent innovation, and digital technology leveraging multi-agent innovation. Secondly, the role of managerial cognition is pivotal. Managerial cognition is the core driving force promoting the digital transformation and innovation of enterprises. Digital transformation, in turn, enables enterprises to continuously accumulate digital technology and digital resources, guiding them from internal single-subject innovation to dual-subject innovation, and ultimately forming a multi-subject innovation model. Thirdly, resource orchestration is a dynamic mechanism. Digital transformation promotes the evolution of enterprise innovation models through resource assembly, resource integration, and resource collaboration. This process not only optimizes the allocation of internal resources within the enterprise but also amplifies the scale effect of innovation through collaboration with external partners. Theoretically, this study aims to enrich the understanding of digital transformation in the context of innovation models for SMMEs. It particularly sheds light on the formation logic of innovation models during the digital transformation process, thereby filling a gap in the existing literature. At the practical level, it will have a certain reference value for the “empowering” and “enabling” processes involved in the digital transformation of SMMEs. It also provides practical guidance for SMMEs on how to achieve innovation during the digital transformation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanmei Xu & Yanan Zhang & Xiang Li & Ziqiang Wang & Qiwen Zhang, 2025. "Research on Digital Transformation and the Innovation Model of SMMEs: The Case Study of PAYA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-32, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3458-:d:1633746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka A. Tubis, 2023. "Digital Maturity Assessment Model for the Organizational and Process Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Garcia-Macia, Daniel & Korosteleva, Julia, 2025. "Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    3. Keeeun Lee & Youngchul Song & Minyoung Park & Byungun Yoon, 2024. "Development of Digital Transformation Maturity Assessment Model for Collaborative Factory Involving Multiple Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-30, September.
    4. Gavrila Gavrila, Sorin & de Lucas Ancillo, Antonio, 2021. "Spanish SMEs’ digitalization enablers: E-Receipt applications to the offline retail market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Jinyu Hu & Yu Rong & Frances M. McKee-Ryan, 2022. "Fifty Shades of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptual Synthesis via a Decision Frame Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 81032, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Kritinee Pongtanalert & Nuttapol Assarut, 2022. "Entrepreneur Mindset, Social Capital and Adaptive Capacity for Tourism SME Resilience and Transformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Ron Adner & Constance E. Helfat, 2003. "Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1011-1025, October.
    9. Sucheta Nadkarni & Pamela S. Barr, 2008. "Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: an integrated view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1395-1427, December.
    10. Daniella Laureiro‐Martínez & Stefano Brusoni, 2018. "Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision‐making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1031-1058, April.
    11. Kratochvil, Renate, 2025. "The process of framing innovation activities: How strategic leaders erode their ideas for radical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    12. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Karolina Kolinska & Adam Kolinski, 2023. "Impact of Market Drivers on the Digital Maturity of Logistics Processes in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Ilona Ilvonen & Stefan Thalmann & Markus Manhart & Christian Sillaber, 2018. "Reconciling digital transformation and knowledge protection: a research agenda," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 235-244, April.
    14. Max M. Weber & Peter Kokott, 2024. "Organizational Resilience and the Attention-Based View of the Firm—Empirical Evidence from German SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Artamoshina, Polina & Shirokova, Galina & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Bodolica, Virginia, 2023. "ADHD symptoms of CEOs and business model innovation in the SME context," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Paulina Kubera, 2023. "Behavioural Insights in Corporate Sustainability Research: A Review and Future Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Hess, Thomas & Matt, Christian & Benlian, Alexander & Wiesböck, Florian, 2016. "Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82423, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daliborka Witschel & Aaron Döhla & Maximilian Kaiser & Kai-Ingo Voigt & Thilo Pfletschinger, 2019. "Riding on the wave of digitization: insights how and under what settings dynamic capabilities facilitate digital-driven business model change," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1023-1095, December.
    2. Bruno Siano Rêgo & Shital Jayantilal & João J. Ferreira & Elias G. Carayannis, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Strategic Management: a Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3195-3222, December.
    3. Jia, Junbo & Xu, Yusen & Li, Wenli, 2024. "A study on the strategic momentum of SMEs’ digital transformation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Berbel-Vera, Jose & Barrachina Palanca, Mercedes & Gonzalez-Sanchez, Maria Beatriz, 2022. "Key CDO functions for successful digital transformation: Insights from a Delphi study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Lei Guo & Luying Xu, 2021. "The Effects of Digital Transformation on Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    7. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Cyfert, Szymon & Malewska, Kamila & Mierzejewska, Katarzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2023. "The impact of resources on digital transformation in energy sector companies. The role of readiness for digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Ander, Veronika & Cihelka, Petr & Tyrychtr, Jan & Novák, David, 2022. "Towards Compromise User Experience Design in Ambient Intelligent Environment," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(2), June.
    10. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Fuming Deng & Lu Cai & Xiaolei Ma, 2024. "Does digital transformation restrict the carbon emission intensity of enterprises? Evidence from listed manufacturing enterprises in China," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 364-384, May.
    12. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    13. Nicodemus M. Mutinda & James M. Kilika, 2019. "TMT Cognitive Capability and Organizational Outcomes: A Theoretical Review," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 31-52, August.
    14. Cong Cheng & Hongfang Cui, 2024. "Combining digital and legacy technologies: firm digital transformation strategies—evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. T. O. Tolstykh & L. A. Gamidullayeva & E. V. Shkarupeta, 2018. "Key factors of development of the industrial enterprises in the conditions of the industry 4.0," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(1).
    16. Tina C. Ambos & Katherine Tatarinov, 2022. "Building Responsible Innovation in International Organizations through Intrapreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 92-125, January.
    17. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang, 2023. "How Does Digital Transformation Facilitate Enterprise Total Factor Productivity? The Multiple Mediators of Supplier Concentration and Customer Concentration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Sebastian Kussl & Andreas Wald, 2022. "Smart Mobility and its Implications for Road Infrastructure Provision: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3458-:d:1633746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.