IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3165-d1626984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Effect of the Sustainability Committee on the Relationship of Size of Board of Directors with Environmental Sustainability Disclosures: A Study in the Transportation Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Habib Gürbüz

    (Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta 32200, Turkey
    Engine Vehicles Application and Research Center, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta 32200, Turkey)

  • Cennet Gürbüz

    (Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Accounting and Finance, Isparta 32200, Turkey)

Abstract

Recently, studies have highlighted the impact of factors such as environmental, corporate governance, and social performances on companies’ sustainability activities. Therefore, the current study focuses on the impact of environmental and social activities of manufacturing and service enterprises operating in the transportation sector, which is at the forefront of pollutant component production, on sustainability disclosures. For this purpose, how the size of the board of directors in the transportation sector affects environmental sustainability disclosures and the mediating effect of the existence of a sustainability committee (SC) on ecological sustainability disclosures are discussed. For this, panel data analysis was carried out with the data of 47 companies operating in the transportation sector of European Union member countries between 2005 and 2020. The paper’s conclusions demonstrate that increasing board size and adding an SC to the board of directors will improve a company’s environmental performance. They also shows that the relationship between board size and environmental sustainability performance will be improved by the presence of an SC. The paper demonstrates that incorporating environmental sustainability initiatives into the strategic decision-making procedures of manufacturing and service firms in the transportation sector can offer another perspective to its stakeholders, policymakers, and sector organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Habib Gürbüz & Cennet Gürbüz, 2025. "The Mediating Effect of the Sustainability Committee on the Relationship of Size of Board of Directors with Environmental Sustainability Disclosures: A Study in the Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3165-:d:1626984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Benlemlih & M. Arif & M. Nadeem, 2023. "Institutional Ownership and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Comparative Study of the UK and the USA," Post-Print hal-04435468, HAL.
    2. Saqib Muneer & Ajay Singh & Mazhar Hussain Choudhary & Awwad Saad Alshammari & Nasir Ali Butt, 2025. "Does Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Governance Ensure the Financial Sustainability of Islamic Banks?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Puji Handayati & Yeut Hong Tham & Yuni Yuningsih & Zhiyue Sun & Tatas Ridho Nugroho & Sulis Rochayatun, 2025. "ESG Performance and Corporate Governance—The Moderating Role of the Big Four Auditors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Kuo-Cheng Kuo & Hsiao-Yun Yu & Wen-Min Lu & Thu-Thao Le, 2022. "Sustainability and Corporate Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Investments in the Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang, 2021. "Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2891-2934, June.
    7. Lois Mahoney & Linda Thorn, 2006. "An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Canadian Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 149-162, December.
    8. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    9. Ray Donnelly & Mark Mulcahy, 2008. "Board Structure, Ownership, and Voluntary Disclosure in Ireland," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 416-429, September.
    10. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    11. Antoine B. Awad & Robert Gharios & Bashar Abu Khalaf & Lena A. Seissian, 2024. "Board Characteristics and Bank Stock Performance: Empirical Evidence from the MENA Region," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Ahmet Jeyhunov & Jong Dae Kim & Seong Mi Bae, 2025. "The Effects of Board Diversity on Korean Companies’ ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-26, January.
    13. Boone, Audra L. & Casares Field, Laura & Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Raheja, Charu G., 2007. "The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 66-101, July.
    14. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2008. "Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 120-136, February.
    15. Fadi Alkaraan & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & V. G. Venkatesh & Yangyan Shi & Nadia Gulko, 2024. "Reinforcing green business strategies with Industry 4.0 and governance towards sustainability: Natural‐resource‐based view and dynamic capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3588-3606, May.
    16. Ateeq ur Rehman Irshad & Nabeel Safdar & Zahid Irshad Younas & Wajiha Manzoor, 2023. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms’ Environmental Performance: Case Study of Environmental Sustainability-Based Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Marco Taliento & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2019. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Wang, Guihua & Bai, Song & Ogden, Joan M., 2009. "Identifying Contributions of On-road Motor Vehicles to Urban Air Pollution Using Travel Demand Model Data," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2700q8x1, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    20. Liao, Lin & Luo, Le & Tang, Qingliang, 2015. "Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 409-424.
    21. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 991-1009, July.
    22. Yongjun Tang & Jun Zhu & Wenchao Ma & Mengxue Zhao, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Institutional Pressure on Carbon Information Disclosure: The Mediating Effect of Enterprise Peer Influence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    2. Muhammad Kaleem Khan & R. M. Ammar Zahid & Adil Saleem & Judit Sági, 2021. "Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2020. "Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 74-94, January.
    4. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & María D. Odriozola, 2019. "CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Rania Béji & Ouidad Yousfi & Abdelwahed Omri, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach," Post-Print hal-03144756, HAL.
    6. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    7. Rania B'eji & Ouidad Yousfi & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: A cognitive approach," Papers 2102.09218, arXiv.org.
    8. Ghafoor, Abdul & Šeho, Mirzet & Sifat, Imtiaz, 2023. "Co-opted board and firm climate change risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    10. Muhammad Nadeem, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Supplemental Environmental Projects: A Restorative Justice Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 261-280, October.
    11. Nadia Smaili & Camélia Radu & Amir Khalili, 2023. "Board effectiveness and cybersecurity disclosure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1049-1071, December.
    12. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    13. Zhongtian Li & Jing Jia & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2022. "The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1292-1324, July.
    14. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    16. Wenbin Long & Le Luo & Hongfeng Sun & Qiqi Zhong, 2023. "Does going abroad lead to going green? Firm outward foreign direct investment and domestic environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 484-498, January.
    17. Halit Gonenc & Antonina V. Krasnikova, 2022. "Board Gender Diversity and Voluntary Carbon Emission Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Jonathan Taglialatela & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2024. "Talk or walk? The board of directors and firm environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2890-2910, May.
    19. Syed Quaid Ali Shah & Fong-Woon Lai & Muhammad Kashif Shad & Zdeňka Konečná & Feybi Ariani Goni & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2021. "The Inclusion of Intellectual Capital into the Green Board Committee to Enhance Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Ginesti, Gianluca & Campa, Domenico & Spano’, Rosanna & Allini, Alessandra & Maffei, Marco, 2023. "The role of CSR committee characteristics on R&D investments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3165-:d:1626984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.