IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3086-d1624917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Adaptive Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A Rangeland Living Laboratory at the US Sheep Experiment Station

Author

Listed:
  • Hailey Wilmer

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Jonathan Spiess

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Patrick E. Clark

    (Northwest Watershed Research Center, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Boise, ID 83712, USA)

  • Michelle Anderson

    (Department of Biology, University of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT 59725, USA)

  • Amira Burns

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Arica Crootof

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT 59725, USA)

  • Lily Fanok

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Tracy Hruska

    (Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran Katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland)

  • Bruce J. Mincher

    (Idaho Wild Sheep Foundation, Boise, ID 83707, USA)

  • Ryan S. Miller

    (Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA)

  • William Munger

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Christian J. Posbergh

    (Department of Animal & Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Carrie S. Wilson

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Eric Winford

    (Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho, Boise, ID 83702, USA)

  • Jessica Windh

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Idaho Extension, Twin Falls, ID 83301, USA)

  • Nicole Strong

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

  • Marlen Eve

    (Office of National Programs, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA)

  • J. Bret Taylor

    (Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA)

Abstract

Social conflict over rangeland-use priorities, especially near protected areas, has long pitted environmental and biodiversity conservation interests against livestock livelihoods. Social–ecological conflict limits management adaptation and creativity while reinforcing social and disciplinary divisions. It can also reduce rancher access to land and negatively affect wildlife conservation. Communities increasingly expect research organizations to address complex social dynamics to improve opportunities for multiple ecosystem service delivery on rangelands. In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), an area of the western US, long-standing disagreements among actors who argue for the use of the land for livestock and those who prioritize wildlife are limiting conservation and ranching livelihoods. Researchers at the USDA-ARS US Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) along with University and societal partners are responding to these challenges using a collaborative adaptive management (CAM) methodology. The USSES Rangeland Collaboratory is a living laboratory project leveraging the resources of a federal range sheep research ranch operating across sagebrush steppe ecosystems in Clark County, Idaho, and montane/subalpine landscapes in Beaverhead County, Montana. The project places stakeholders, including ranchers, conservation groups, and government land managers, in the decision-making seat for a participatory case study. This involves adaptive management planning related to grazing and livestock–wildlife management decisions for two ranch-scale rangeland management scenarios, one modeled after a traditional range sheep operation and the second, a more intensified operation with no use of summer ranges. We discuss the extent to which the CAM approach creates opportunities for multi-directional learning among participants and evaluate trade-offs among preferred management systems through participatory ranch-scale grazing research. In a complex system where the needs and goals of various actors are misaligned across spatiotemporal, disciplinary, and social–ecological scales, CAM creates a structure and methods to focus on social learning and land management knowledge creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailey Wilmer & Jonathan Spiess & Patrick E. Clark & Michelle Anderson & Amira Burns & Arica Crootof & Lily Fanok & Tracy Hruska & Bruce J. Mincher & Ryan S. Miller & William Munger & Christian J. Pos, 2025. "Collaborative Adaptive Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A Rangeland Living Laboratory at the US Sheep Experiment Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3086-:d:1624917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Havstad, Kris M. & Peters, Debra P.C. & Skaggs, Rhonda & Brown, Joel & Bestelmeyer, Brandon & Fredrickson, Ed & Herrick, Jeffrey & Wright, Jack, 2007. "Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 261-268, December.
    2. Maria R Emery & Alan R Pierce, 2005. "Interrupting the Telos: Locating Subsistence in Contemporary US Forests," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 981-993, June.
    3. Sheila Barry & Lynn Huntsinger, 2021. "Rangeland Land-Sharing, Livestock Grazing’s Role in the Conservation of Imperiled Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Gardezi, Maaz & Abuayyash, Halimeh & Adler, Paul R. & Alvez, Juan P. & Anjum, Rubaina & Badireddy, Appala Raju & Brugler, Skye & Carcamo, Pablo & Clay, David & Dadkhah, Ali & Emery, Mary & Faulkner, J, 2024. "The role of living labs in cultivating inclusive and responsible innovation in precision agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Chris McPhee & Margaret Bancerz & Muriel Mambrini-Doudet & François Chrétien & Christian Huyghe & Javier Gracia-Garza, 2021. "The Defining Characteristics of Agroecosystem Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Lance Gunderson & Stephen Light, 2006. "Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(4), pages 323-334, December.
    7. McIntyre, Kathleen B. & Schultz, Courtney A., 2020. "Facilitating collaboration in forest management: Assessing the benefits of collaborative policy innovations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Corrine Nöel Knapp & Robin S. Reid & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Julia A. Klein & Kathleen A. Galvin, 2019. "Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Cernea, Michael M. & Schmidt-Soltau, Kai, 2006. "Poverty Risks and National Parks: Policy Issues in Conservation and Resettlement," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1808-1830, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Hailey Wilmer & J. Bret Taylor & Daniel Macon & Matthew C. Reeves & Carrie S. Wilson & Jacalyn Mara Beck & Nicole K. Strong, 2025. "Loss of seasonal ranges reshapes transhumant adaptive capacity: Thirty-five years at the US Sheep Experiment Station," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 545-563, March.
    3. Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf & Burton St. John & Pragati Rawat & Michelle Covi & Janet Gail Nicula & Carol Considine, 2019. "The Action-oriented Stakeholder Engagement for a Resilient Tomorrow (ASERT) framework: an effective, field-tested approach for engaging stakeholders," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 409-418, December.
    4. Erin Bunting & Jessica Steele & Eric Keys & Shylock Muyengwa & Brian Child & Jane Southworth, 2013. "Local Perception of Risk to Livelihoods in the Semi-Arid Landscape of Southern Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Yanzi Wang & Chunming Wu & Yongfeng Gong & Zhen Zhu, 2021. "Can Adaptive Governance Promote Coupling Social-Ecological Systems? Evidence from the Vulnerable Ecological Region of Northwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Taylor, Michael H. & Rollins, Kimberly, 2012. "Using Ecological Models to Coordinate Valuation of Ecological Change on Western Rangelands for ex post Application to Policy Analysis," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(01), pages 1-9.
    7. Pawera, Lukas & Manickam, Ravishankar & Wangungu, Carolyne & Bonnarith, Uon & Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Ramasamy, Srinivasan, 2024. "Guidance on farmer participation in the design, testing and scaling of agricultural innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    8. Clements, Tom & Suon, Seng & Wilkie, David S. & Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2014. "Impacts of Protected Areas on Local Livelihoods in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 125-134.
    9. Dyah Rahmawati Hizbaron & Dina Ruslanjari & Djati Mardiatno, 2021. "Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic: An Adaptive Disaster Governance in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Rose A Graves & Ryan D Haugo & Andrés Holz & Max Nielsen-Pincus & Aaron Jones & Bryce Kellogg & Cathy Macdonald & Kenneth Popper & Michael Schindel, 2020. "Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Laura M. Norman & Miguel L. Villarreal & Rewati Niraula & Mark Haberstich & Natalie R. Wilson, 2019. "Modelling Development of Riparian Ranchlands Using Ecosystem Services at the Aravaipa Watershed, SE Arizona," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Spiegal, Sheri & Kleinman, Peter J.A. & Endale, Dinku M. & Bryant, Ray B. & Dell, Curtis & Goslee, Sarah & Meinen, Robert J. & Flynn, K. Colton & Baker, John M. & Browning, Dawn M. & McCarty, Greg & B, 2020. "Manuresheds: Advancing nutrient recycling in US agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Thapa Karki, Shova & Hubacek, Klaus, 2015. "Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 129-139.
    14. Ota, Tetsuji & Lonn, Pichdara & Mizoue, Nobuya, 2020. "A country scale analysis revealed effective forest policy affecting forest cover changes in Cambodia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Claudia Pahl-Wostl & Paul Jeffrey & Nicola Isendahl & Marcela Brugnach, 2011. "Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(3), pages 837-856, February.
    16. Sayuni B. Mariki, 2013. "Conservation With a Human Face? Comparing Local Participation and Benefit Sharing From a National Park and a State Forest Plantation in Tanzania," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    17. Ansell, Christopher K. & Bartenberger, Martin, 2016. "Varieties of experimentalism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 64-73.
    18. Li, Zhiguo & Han, Guodong & Zhao, Mengli & Wang, Jing & Wang, Zhongwu & Kemp, David R. & Michalk, David L. & Wilkes, Andreas & Behrendt, Karl & Wang, Hong & Langford, Colin, 2015. "Identifying management strategies to improve sustainability and household income for herders on the desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 62-72.
    19. Miguel Cantillo, 2015. "Dynamic Investment with Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard," Working Papers 201501, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised Mar 2015.
    20. Sandra Fatorić & Ricard Morén-Alegret & Rhiannon Jane Niven & George Tan, 2017. "Living with climate change risks: stakeholders’ employment and coastal relocation in mediterranean climate regions of Australia and Spain," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 276-288, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3086-:d:1624917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.