IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2974-d1621899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KIBS Driving Sustainable Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and the United States (2010–2020)

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Jae Shin

    (Division of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates the economic role and spillover effects of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS), one of the key instruments for sustainable economic growth, in South Korea and the United States from 2010 to 2020. KIBS, comprising Technology-Intensive KIBS (T-KIBS) and Professional KIBS (P-KIBS), serve as critical drivers of innovation within organizations and economic systems, fostering long-term economic sustainability. To rigorously assess the economic spillover effects of KIBS in promoting sustainable economic growth, this study examines how its impact varies based on industrial structure, economic scale, and firms’ capacity to leverage KIBS effectively, while also identifying key structural differences across national contexts. The findings reveal that both countries exhibit a similar economic function for KIBS, with T-KIBS categorized as a “primitive final demand type” and P-KIBS as a “primitive intermediate demand type”. However, the economic spillover effects of KIBS were more stable in the U.S., whereas South Korea experienced greater fluctuations. In particular, South Korea’s P-KIBS had a more pronounced impact on the secondary sector, particularly manufacturing. As of 2020, the production-inducing effect of South Korea’s P-KIBS on the manufacturing sector was 39.1%, while its value-added-inducing effect stood at 27.0%, and its supply-shortage effect reached 50.9%. These values exceeded those of P-KIBS in the United States and generally surpassed the economic spillover effects observed for South Korea’s T-KIBS. Furthermore, the inter-industry linkage analysis suggests that KIBS plays a more significant role as a raw material input within the U.S. economic system. In 2020, the forward linkage effect of U.S. T-KIBS was 0.853, while that of U.S. P-KIBS stood at 2.116. These figures were higher than the forward linkage effects recorded for South Korea’s T-KIBS (0.635) and P-KIBS (1.590), underscoring the stronger integration of KIBS into the U.S. industrial structure. Additionally, the supply-shortage effects were more significant than other economic spillover effects in both countries, underscoring KIBS’ critical function as a key production input. These findings underscore the necessity of differentiated policies for fostering and supplying KIBS based on each country’s industrial structure and economic characteristics. Given its pivotal role in economic growth, this study emphasizes the need for a stable supply of KIBS to ensure continued productivity and value creation. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the necessity of fostering innovation within the T-KIBS sector, particularly in research and development, to enhance its contribution to financial and organizational innovation. By developing strategic policies tailored to national economic conditions, countries can maximize the economic benefits Cof KIBS and strengthen their long-term economic sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Jae Shin, 2025. "KIBS Driving Sustainable Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and the United States (2010–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2974-:d:1621899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darío Milesi & Carlos Aggio & Vladimiro Verre, 2024. "Technological learning in natural resources-based activities: the role of idiosyncratic knowledge and knowledge intensive business services," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3/4), pages 358-383.
    2. Nicoletta Corrocher & Lucia Cusmano, 2014. "The 'KIBS Engine' of Regional Innovation Systems: Empirical Evidence from European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 1212-1226, July.
    3. Mohan, Preeya & Strobl, Eric & Watson, Patrick, 2021. "Innovation, market failures and policy implications of KIBS firms: The case of Trinidad and Tobago's oil and gas sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Zilu Ma & Yaping Huang, 2024. "The Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Urban Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    6. Jean Pierre Seclen & Jon Barrutia, 2018. "KIBS and innovation in machine tool manufacturers. Evidence from the Basque Country," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 112-131.
    7. Muller, Emmanuel & Zenker, Andrea, 2001. "Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1501-1516, December.
    8. Yipeng Liu & Christoph Lattemann & Yijun Xing & David Dorawa, 2019. "The emergence of collaborative partnerships between knowledge-intensive business service (KIBS) and product companies: the case of Bremen, Germany," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 376-387, March.
    9. Xu, Guiyang, 2025. "KIBS Clustering, digital financial inclusion, and economic growth quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Yong Jae Shin, 2024. "Identifying the Role of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in the Korean Economy as a Sustainable Innovation Tool Using Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Vicent Almenar-Llongo & Javier Muñoz- de-Prat & Mónica Maldonado-Devis, 2023. "Growth of total productivity of the factors, innovation and spillovers from advanced business services," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 2172739-217, July.
    12. Jean Gadrey & Faïz Gallouj, 2002. "Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services. New Economic and Socio-Economic Approaches," Post-Print halshs-00198351, HAL.
    13. Wong, Zoey & Li, Rongrong & Zhang, Yidie & Kong, Qunxi & Cai, Molly, 2021. "Financial services, spatial agglomeration, and the quality of urban economic growth–based on an empirical analysis of 268 cities in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    14. Frank Moulaert & Faridah Djellal, 1995. "Information Technology Consultancy Firms: Economies of Agglomeration from a Wide-area Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 105-122, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Jae Shin, 2024. "Identifying the Role of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in the Korean Economy as a Sustainable Innovation Tool Using Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    3. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2016. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 3: Zur Standortstruktur von wissensintensiven Unternehmensdiensten – Fakten, Bestimmungsgründe, regionalpo," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59427.
    5. Krzysztof BORODAKO & Jadwiga BERBEKA & Michał RUDNICKI & Mariusz ŠAPCZYŃSKI, 2021. "Online Visibility and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Performance: The Scope of Interrelatedness," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 157-173, August.
    6. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Kenta Ikeuchi & Masatoshi Kato, 2022. "Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: evidence from Japanese prefectures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 190-209, February.
    7. Jan Ženka & Josef Novotný & Ondřej Slach & Igor Ivan, 2017. "Spatial Distribution of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in a Small Post-Communist Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 385-406, June.
    8. Jeroen Content & Nicola Cortinovis & Koen Frenken & Jacob Jordaan, 2022. "The roles of KIBS and R&D in the industrial diversification of regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 29-64, February.
    9. Samul Joanna & Skapska Elzbieta & Pankov Dmitrij, 2019. "Employees’ Competences in Knowledge-Intensive Business Sector – Comparative Analysis in Two Cee Countries," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 64(1), pages 3-15, April.
    10. Thomas Brenner & Marco Capasso & Matthias Duschl & Koen Frenken & Tania Treibich, 2018. "Causal relations between knowledge-intensive business services and regional employment growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 172-183, February.
    11. Xing Shi & Yanrui Wu & Dingtao Zhao, 2014. "Knowledge intensive business services and their impact on innovation in China," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(4), pages 479-498, December.
    12. Gallouj, Faïz, 2002. "Services innovation: assimilation, differentiation, inversion and integration," MPRA Paper 62174, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Honggang Qi & Shenghe Liu & Wei Qi & Zhen Liu, 2019. "Geographical Concentration of Knowledge- and Technology-Intensive Industries and City Innovation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Marina Doroshenko & Ian Miles & Dmitri Vinogradov, 2013. "Knowledge Intensive Business Services As Generators Of Innovations," HSE Working papers WP BRP 12/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Christiane Hipp & Jorge Gallego & Luis Rubalcaba, 2015. "Shaping innovation in European knowledge-intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(1), pages 41-55, March.
    16. David Doloreux & Anika Laperrière, 2014. "Internationalisation and innovation in the knowledge-intensive business services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(4), pages 635-657, December.
    17. Faïz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2011. "Elaborating the characteristics-based approach to service innovation: making the service process visible," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 33-58.
    18. Lombardi, Silvia & Santini, Erica & Vecciolini, Claudia, 2022. "Drivers of territorial servitization: An empirical analysis of manufacturing productivity in local value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    19. Doloreux, David & Zenker, Andrea & Muller, Emmanuel, 2008. "Services à forte intensité de connaissances, contexte régional et comportements d'innovation: une comparaison internationale," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2008, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    20. Francisco Mas-Verdú & Anthony Wensley & Martin Alba & José García Álvarez-Coque, 2011. "How much does KIBS contribute to the generation and diffusion of innovation?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(3), pages 195-212, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2974-:d:1621899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.