IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2539-d1611808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Ecological Cognition and Compensation Strategies for Livelihood Transitions: Insights from the Poyang Lake Fishing Ban Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jiancheng Zhai

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jie Yao

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xueqin Hu

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Jun Tian

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Ruijie Yang

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Feiyan Lv

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Zhiqiang Huang

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Liaobo Wang

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    Natural Reserve Planning and Research Institute, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

The “Ten-Year Fishing Ban” policy in the Yangtze River Basin aims to restore ecological diversity but poses significant challenges for the fishermen in their transition to alternative livelihoods. This study focuses on fishermen who worked on Poyang Lake, using the sustainable livelihood framework and the theory of planned behavior, combined with fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and descriptive statistics, to explore the interaction effects of livelihood capital, ecological cognition, and compensation policies on fishermen’s behavioral responses. Key findings include the following: natural, financial, and psychological capital are core drivers of enhanced ecological cognition, with combined effects significantly increasing sensitivity to policy and environmental changes through pathways like “ecological transition drive”, “knowledge adaptation support”, and “multi-cooperation synergy”. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and compensation policy transparency are crucial for positive responses, while social norms and policy fairness can compensate for individual motivation deficits, forming pathways like “ecological drive-policy recognition” and “norm drive-social support”. Current issues such as low compensation standards, insufficient retraining, and gender differences limit policy effectiveness. Optimizing measures like differentiated fishing permits, dynamic compensation mechanisms, and cultural empowerment are needed to balance ecological protection and social equity. The study suggests enhancing financial and psychological capital, improving vocational training systems, and increasing policy transparency to provide theoretical and practical references for sustainable global fisheries management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiancheng Zhai & Jie Yao & Xueqin Hu & Jun Tian & Ruijie Yang & Feiyan Lv & Zhiqiang Huang & Liaobo Wang, 2025. "Integrating Ecological Cognition and Compensation Strategies for Livelihood Transitions: Insights from the Poyang Lake Fishing Ban Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2539-:d:1611808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiancheng Zhai & Xiao Sun & Xueqin Hu & Jun Tian & Zhiqiang Huang, 2024. "Evolutionary Trends and Hotspot Analysis of Livelihood Strategy for Agricultural Residents Based on Bibliometrics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Hongzhi Ma & Yexi Zhong & Minghui Ou & Wenhui Wang & Xinghua Feng, 2022. "The Transformation of Fishermen’s Livelihoods in the Context of a Comprehensive Fishing Ban: A Case Study of Datang Village at the Poyang Lake Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Sha Yang & Jia Wu, 2023. "The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Qi Chen & Hongyan Su & Xuan Yu & Qiuguang Hu, 2020. "Livelihood Vulnerability of Marine Fishermen to Multi-Stresses under the Vessel Buyback and Fishermen Transfer Programs in China: The Case of Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Carlos A. Nobre, 2019. "To save Brazil’s rainforest, boost its science," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7779), pages 455-455, October.
    6. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Reiling, Stephen D., 2000. "Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 93-107, January.
    7. Krausmann, Fridolin & Gingrich, Simone & Eisenmenger, Nina & Erb, Karl-Heinz & Haberl, Helmut & Fischer-Kowalski, Marina, 2009. "Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2696-2705, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George C. Efthimiou & Panos Kalimeris & Spyros Andronopoulos & John G. Bartzis, 2018. "Statistical Projection of Material Intensity: Evidence from the Global Economy and 107 Countries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1465-1472, December.
    2. Yanju Luo & Jinyang Deng & Chad Pierskalla & Ju-hyoung Lee & Jiayao Tang, 2022. "New Ecological Paradigm, Leisure Motivation, and Wellbeing Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis of Recreational Use of Urban Parks before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Williams, Ryan B. & Mitchell, Donna M. & Neill, Clinton L. & Benson, Aaron, 2015. "Household Willingness to Pay for Playa Restoration," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196917, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Lucia Reisch & Clive L Spash & Sabine Bietz, 2008. "Sustainable Consumption and Mass Communication: A German Experiment," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-12, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    5. Rode, Julian & Le Menestrel, Marc & Cornelissen, Gert, 2017. "Ecosystem Service Arguments Enhance Public Support for Environmental Protection - But Beware of the Numbers!," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 213-221.
    6. Kerstin K Zander & Gillian B Ainsworth & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Stephen T Garnett, 2014. "Threatened Bird Valuation in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    7. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Paul A. Hindsley & O. Ashton Morgan, 2020. "The Role of Cultural Worldviews in Willingness to Pay for Environmental Policy," Working Papers 20-03, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    9. Yuxiang Lan & Qunyue Liu, 2023. "The Restorative and Contingent Value of Biophilic Indoor Environments in Healthcare Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Denise L. Stanley, 2005. "Local Perception of Public Goods: Recent Assessments of Willingness‐to‐pay for Endangered Species," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 165-179, April.
    11. Ragnheiður Bogadóttir, 2020. "The Social Metabolism of Quiet Sustainability in the Faroe Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Dienes, Christian, 2015. "Actions and intentions to pay for climate change mitigation: Environmental concern and the role of economic factors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 122-129.
    13. Hongzhi Ma & Yexi Zhong & Minghui Ou & Wenhui Wang & Xinghua Feng, 2022. "The Transformation of Fishermen’s Livelihoods in the Context of a Comprehensive Fishing Ban: A Case Study of Datang Village at the Poyang Lake Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Yrjola, Tapani & Kola, Jukka, 2002. "Social Benefits of Multifunctional Agriculture in Finland," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24812, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Li, Zhengtao & Hu, Bin, 2018. "Perceived health risk, environmental knowledge, and contingent valuation for improving air quality: New evidence from the Jinchuan mining area in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 54-68.
    16. Marco Bianchi & Carlos Tapia & Ikerne del Valle, 2020. "Monitoring domestic material consumption at lower territorial levels: A novel data downscaling method," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1074-1087, October.
    17. Bartczak, Anna, 2015. "The role of social and environmental attitudes in non-market valuation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 357-365.
    18. Cheung, Millissa F.Y. & To, W.M., 2019. "An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 145-153.
    19. Drevs, Florian & Tscheulin, Dieter K. & Lindenmeier, Jörg & Renner, Simone, 2014. "Crowding-in or crowding out: An empirical analysis on the effect of subsidies on individual willingness-to-pay for public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 250-261.
    20. Mansoora Ahmed & Sun Zehou & Syed Ali Raza & Muhammad Asif Qureshi & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2020. "Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2225-2239, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2539-:d:1611808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.