IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2000-d1600217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Sustainable Investment Efficiency and Transparency Through Blockchain-Driven Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Ameni Boumaiza

    (Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute (QEERI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Doha P.O. Box 34110, Qatar)

Abstract

In the context of escalating climate change and mounting environmental challenges, green finance has emerged as a crucial mechanism for fostering sustainable development. This paper presents an experimental analysis that illustrates how the integration of blockchain technology into financial technology (fintech) strategies can significantly enhance the efficacy of green investments. Our proposed framework facilitates the optimization of these strategies by improving transparency and fund traceability in environmentally focused projects. Through rigorous testing and data-driven insights, we demonstrate the potential of blockchain to streamline financing processes, mitigate risks associated with fraudulent practices, and promote accountability among stakeholders. By establishing a synergistic relationship between fintech and ecological responsibility, this research provides a novel approach that contributes to both academic discourse and practical applications in green finance. The proposed approach showcases experimental originality by integrating blockchain technology with green finance, setting a precedent for future research in this interdisciplinary field. Our findings reveal that blockchain can significantly enhance the efficiency of financing processes, reducing transactional delays and fostering transparency that mitigates risks related to fraud. Moreover, this study highlights the potential of this synergistic model to cultivate a robust framework for accountability among stakeholders, ultimately guiding investment toward environmentally sustainable initiatives and bolstering the integrity of green financial practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameni Boumaiza, 2025. "Advancing Sustainable Investment Efficiency and Transparency Through Blockchain-Driven Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2000-:d:1600217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ameni Boumaiza, 2024. "A Blockchain-Based Scalability Solution with Microgrids Peer-to-Peer Trade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Bufan Zhang & Yifeng Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Green Finance on Energy Sustainable Development: A Case Study in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 3435-3454, September.
    3. Christian Catalini & Joshua S. Gans, 2016. "Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain," NBER Working Papers 22952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:qzmf8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    3. Wang Guizhou & Zhang Si & Yu Tao & Ning Yu, 2021. "A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 205-238, June.
    4. Yongkang Lin & Qinghua Song & Lingyun He, 2025. "Can the green finance reform and innovation pilot policy promote green technology innovation?—a novelty evidence from both polluting companies and city commercial banks in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 8403-8431, April.
    5. Anil Donmez & Alexander Karaivanov, 2022. "Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 265-292, January.
    6. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    7. Wang, Qiyu & Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, 2021. "Factor pricing of cryptocurrencies," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Zohra Asif & Summera Unar, 2024. "Cryptocurrency Market Dynamics: Trends, Volatility, and Regulatory Challenges," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 641-646.
    9. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    10. Shi, Jinyan & Yu, Conghui & Li, Yanxi & Wang, Tianhe, 2022. "Does green financial policy affect debt-financing cost of heavy-polluting enterprises? An empirical evidence based on Chinese pilot zones for green finance reform and innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Ajoy Ketan Sarangi & Rudra Prakash Pradhan, 2020. "ICT infrastructure and economic growth: a critical assessment and some policy implications," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 363-383, December.
    12. Ge, Yongbo & Zhu, Yuexiao, 2022. "Boosting green recovery: Green credit policy in heavily polluted industries and stock price crash risk," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "Reaping green dividend: The effect of China's urban new energy transition strategy on green economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    14. Qianyi Du & Haoran Pan & Shuang Liang & Xiaoxue Liu, 2023. "Can Green Credit Policies Accelerate the Realization of the Dual Carbon Goal in China? Examination Based on an Endogenous Financial CGE Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Darcy W E Allen & Alastair Berg & Chris Berg & Brendan Markey-Towler & Jason Potts, 2019. "Some economic consequences of the GDPR," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(2), pages 785-797.
    16. Huberman, Gur & Leshno, Jacob D. & Moallemi, Ciamac, 2017. "Monopoly without a monopolist: An economic analysis of the bitcoin payment system," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 27/2017, Bank of Finland.
    17. Martin Cimiterra & Jackie Krafft & Lionel Nesta, 2021. "Blockchain as Schumpeter Mark 1 or Mark 2? An empirical analysis of blockchain job offers in France and Germany [Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1388-1402.
    18. Siyu Ren & Mingyue Du, 2024. "Will Green Finance Become a New Driving Force for Environmental Governance in The Post-Covid-19 Era: Evidence from China," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 27(1), pages 151-166, March.
    19. Feng, Chao & Liu, Yu-Qi & Yang, Jun, 2024. "Do energy trade patterns affect renewable energy development? The threshold role of digital economy and economic freedom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Mattila, Juri, . "Blockchain Systems as Multi-sided Platforms," ETLA A, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, number 51, June.
    21. Tianyao Zhen & Md. Mominur Rahman, 2024. "Greening Emerging Economies: Enhancing Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance through Environmental Management Accounting and Green Financing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2000-:d:1600217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.