IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1365-d1585917.html

The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy on the ESG Performance of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Green Technological Innovation and Financing Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhang Dai

    (School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Rui He

    (Institute of Curriculum and Textbook Research, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100029, China
    Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

The carbon emissions trading policy is a key policy driving China’s low-carbon economic transition. Based on the policy environment of China’s carbon emissions trading pilot program from 2010 to 2021, this research selects representative heavy-polluting listed enterprises from this period as research subjects. Using the DID model, it investigates the impact of the carbon emissions trading policy on corporate ESG performance. The results of the research show that: (1) The carbon emissions trading policy significantly improves the ESG performance of heavy-polluting enterprises. (2) The carbon emissions trading policy enhances corporate ESG performance primarily by alleviating external financing constraints and stimulating green technological innovation within enterprises. (3) Due to differences in corporate characteristics and decision-making structures, the impact of carbon emissions trading policies on the ESG performance of heavily polluting enterprises exhibits heterogeneity. The findings of research are of great significance for a comprehensive understanding of the carbon emissions trading policy, facilitating fundamental changes in enterprises, promoting the construction of the carbon emissions trading market, and ensuring the timely achievement of the “dual carbon” goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhang Dai & Rui He, 2025. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy on the ESG Performance of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Green Technological Innovation and Financing Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1365-:d:1585917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    2. Qiuyan Yan & Kai Wan, 2024. "Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy and Corporate ESG Performance: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Hirshleifer, David & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Dongmei, 2013. "Innovative efficiency and stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 632-654.
    4. Hua Tang, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Alessio Baratta & Antonio Cimino & Francesco Longo & Vittorio Solina & Saverino Verteramo, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Michael Greenstone & John A. List & Chad Syverson, 2011. "The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competiveness of U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 11-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    8. Xi, Bin & Jia, Weifang, 2025. "Research on the impact of carbon trading on enterprises' green technology innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Yonghong Jiang & Chun Yang & Dandan Zhao & Yuhao Shao & Tapan Senapati, 2024. "The Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2024, pages 1-17, July.
    10. Yu, Yantuan & Zhang, Ning, 2021. "Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Yu, Fan & Xiao, De & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2021. "The impact of carbon emission trading schemes on urban-rural income inequality in China: A multi-period difference-in-differences method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Alexandre Clément & Élisabeth Robinot & Léo Trespeuch, 2023. "The use of ESG scores in academic literature: a systematic literature review," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 92-110, March.
    13. Xiaoqi Li & Dingfei Guo & Chao Feng, 2022. "The Carbon Emissions Trading Policy of China: Does It Really Promote the Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovations?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Zhaoyang Zhao & Shuning Zhou & Siying Wang & Chong Ye & Tuolei Wu, 2022. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy on Industrial Structure Upgrading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Sun, Xing & Lin, Minzhen & Zhong, Huaming, 2024. "The motivation and impact of polluting Enterprises' diversifications: Quasi-natural experiments from environmental protection interview," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    16. Shuangpeng Yang & Zhonglu Chen & Muhammad Umar & Ambreen Khursheed, 2022. "Environmental regulation and high-quality sustainable development of China's economy – an empirical study based on a spatial durbin model and threshold model," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 5699-5718, December.
    17. Wang, Peng-Tao & Xu, Qing-Chuang & Wang, Fei-Yin & Xu, Mao, 2024. "Investigating the impacts of the Dual Carbon Targets on energy and carbon flows in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    18. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiatian Chen & Kaihua Bao & Chen Gao & Ya Wen & Ting Zhang, 2025. "Towards Corporate Sustainability: Can the Cultural and Tourism Consumption Promotion Policy Enhance Corporate ESG Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Hui Huang & Xiujuan Huang, 2025. "Unlocking ESG Performance: How Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors Enhance Corporate Sustainability in China’s Capital Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Xian & Xiong, Xiaoyan, 2025. "ESG performance and corporate innovation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Ningning Kong & Yu Bao & Yiyuan Sun & Yawen Wang, 2023. "Corporations’ ESG for Sustainable Investment in China: The Moderating Role of Regional Marketization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Xianxian Fan & Yunlei Zhou & Qiang Xie, 2025. "Assessment on the synergistic effect of pollution and carbon reductions in low-carbon city pilot policy: based on effectiveness and efficiency perspectives," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 12945-12969, June.
    4. Xiaosheng Li & Yunxia Shu & Xin Jin, 2022. "Environmental regulation, carbon emissions and green total factor productivity: a case study of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2577-2597, February.
    5. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Gu, Yuqi & Zhang, Ling, 2017. "The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on corporate innovation," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 17-30.
    7. Luo, Shuangcheng & Cai, Xiaoqing & Qian, Qiulan & Xia, Hongmei, 2025. "How can market-based environmental regulation drive industrial transformation upgrading? Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading pilot policies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Guorong Chen & Changyan Liu, 2023. "Can Low–Carbon City Development Stimulate Population Growth? Insights from China’s Low–Carbon Pilot Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    9. He, Yiqing & Ding, Xin & Yang, Chuchu, 2021. "Do environmental regulations and financial constraints stimulate corporate technological innovation? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Wunhong Su & Chun Guo & Xiaobao Song, 2022. "Media coverage, Environment Protection Law and environmental research and development: evidence from the Chinese-listed firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6953-6983, May.
    11. Liu, Cenjie & Fang, Jiayu & Xie, Rui, 2021. "Energy policy and corporate financial performance: Evidence from China's 11th five-year plan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Misheck Mutize & Sean J. Gossel, 2019. "Sovereign Credit Rating Announcement Effects on Foreign Currency Denominated Bond and Equity Markets in Africa," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 135-152, January.
    13. Pedro Naso & Yi Huang Author Name: Tim Swanson, 2017. "The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity," CIES Research Paper series 53-2017, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    14. Cenjie Liu & Chunbo Ma & Rui Xie, 2020. "Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 741-768, April.
    15. Xie, Rong-hui & Yuan, Yi-jun & Huang, Jing-jing, 2017. "Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 104-112.
    16. Liu, Hongxun & Gao, Jinfeng & Tian, Peng & Ma, Xiaoming & Meng, Guanfei & Yang, Jingnan & Li, Zhi, 2023. "The impact of environmental regulation on productivity with co-production of goods and bads," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Sun, Dan & Li, Yiping, 2025. "Carbon peaking pressure and corporate R&D investment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    18. Ibishova, Banovsha & Misund, Bård & Tveterås, Ragnar, 2024. "Driving green: Financial benefits of carbon emission reduction in companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    19. Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Francesco Nicolli, 2022. "Sustainable production: The economic returns of circular economy practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2603-2617, July.
    20. Fan, Lin & Wang, Jiali & Lin, Zhongguo & Du, Huibin, 2025. "Official environmental credit evaluation and corporate debt concentration," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1365-:d:1585917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.