IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9379-d1777103.html

Sustainable Corporate Development: Shareholder Value and Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Ratings in Central European Capital Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Kluza

    (Department of Quantitative Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Al. Niepodleglosci 162, 02-554 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Anna Chmielewska

    (Department of Quantitative Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Al. Niepodleglosci 162, 02-554 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

This study analyzes how environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors affect the valuation of listed companies in Central Europe. It therefore validates the financial incentives for corporates in this region to embark on or continue with sustainable business models. It discusses the theoretical foundations of the impact of ESG factors on company value, examining both firm- and investor-centered approaches. The empirical section analyzes the main market valuation indicators based on earnings per share, book value, enterprise value and EBITDA for all companies listed on stock exchanges in the region for which Sustainalytics ESG risk ratings were calculated. The econometric modeling uses the generalized least squares method. The research evidences that companies with strong ESG risk ratings, reflecting sustainable business models, trade at a premium vs. their ESG-weaker peers. This suggests that investors place significant value on sustainability and effective ESG risk management practices. Additionally, this study reveals a non-linear relationship between ESG ratings and market valuations. While investors may show less differentiation among companies with low ESG risk, they impose substantial penalties on those with poor ESG management. From a practical perspective, the findings support investing in ESG risk management and corporate governance as effective strategies to raise company valuation and generate financial benefits for shareholders. The study also indicates that ESG ratings can be applied in forecasting company valuations, which is an important consideration for investors. This study makes an original contribution by providing insights focused on Central European markets, where empirical research on sustainability standards remains in the early stages of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Kluza & Anna Chmielewska, 2025. "Sustainable Corporate Development: Shareholder Value and Environmental, Social and Governance Risk Ratings in Central European Capital Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9379-:d:1777103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9379/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9379/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    2. Emiel Duuren & Auke Plantinga & Bert Scholtens, 2016. "ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 525-533, October.
    3. Marcin Liberadzki & Piotr Jaworski & Kamil Liberadzki, 2021. "Spread Analysis of the Sustainability-Linked Bonds Tied to an Issuer’s Greenhouse Gases Emissions Reduction Target," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Xu, Mao & Tse, Ying Kei & Geng, Ruoqi & Liu, Zhenyuan & Potter, Andrew, 2025. "Greenwashing and market value of firms: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. Saeed Nosratabadi & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Andry Rakotonirainy & Kwok Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Abraham Puente De La Vega Caceres, 2024. "Drivers of Value Creation and the Effect of ESG Risk Rating on Investor Perceptions through Financial Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Haitham Nobanee & Fatima Youssef Al Hamadi & Fatma Ali Abdulaziz & Lina Subhi Abukarsh & Aysha Falah Alqahtani & Shayma Khalifa AlSubaey & Sara Mohamed Alqahtani & Hamama Abdulla Almansoori, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability and Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Aayushi Badhwar & Saniyat Islam & Caroline Swee Lin Tan & Tarun Panwar & Stephen Wigley & Rajkishore Nayak, 2024. "Unraveling Green Marketing and Greenwashing: A Systematic Review in the Context of the Fashion and Textiles Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Changhong Zhao & Yu Guo & Jiahai Yuan & Mengya Wu & Daiyu Li & Yiou Zhou & Jiangang Kang, 2018. "ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Power Generation Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    11. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2022. "Corporate Sustainability Performance and Firm Value through Investment Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y. & Mishra, Dev R., 2011. "Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2388-2406, September.
    13. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    14. Elena Petelos & Danai Antonaki & Erasmia Angelaki & Christos Lemonakis & Garefalakis Alexandros, 2025. "Enhancing Public Health and SDG 3 Through Sustainable Agriculture and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Alexandros Garefalakis & Augustinos Dimitras, 2020. "Looking back and forging ahead: the weighting of ESG factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 151-189, November.
    16. Siwiec Karolina & Karkowska Renata, 2024. "Relationship between ESG and Financial Performance of Companies in the Central and Eastern European Region," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 11(58), pages 178-199, January.
    17. Caterina De Lucia & Pasquale Pazienza & Mark Bartlett, 2020. "Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    18. Małgorzata Janicka & Artur Sajnóg, 2022. "The ESG Reporting of EU Public Companies—Does the Company’s Capitalisation Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Barka, Zeineb & Hamza, Taher & Mrad, Senda, 2023. "Corporate ESG scores and equity market misvaluation: Toward ethical investor behavior," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    20. Z. Barka & Taher Hamza & S. Mrad, 2023. "Corporate ESG Scores and Equity Market Misvaluation: Toward Ethical Investor Behavior," Post-Print hal-04435551, HAL.
    21. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    22. Hanna E. Czaja-Cieszyńska & Dominika Kordela, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting in Energy Companies—Is There a Link between Social Disclosures, the Experience and Market Value?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    23. Monika Hadaś-Dyduch & Blandyna Puszer & Maria Czech & Janusz Cichy, 2022. "Green Bonds as an Instrument for Financing Ecological Investments in the V4 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-48, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachana Manoj Lunawat & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2025. "Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors into the Investment Returns of American Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ícaro Guilherme Félix Cunha & Renata Veloso Santos Policarpo & Paula Cristina Senra Oliveira & Etienne Cardoso Abdala & Daisy Aparecida Nascimento Rebelatto, 2025. "A systematic review of ESG indicators and corporate performance: proposal for a conceptual framework," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    4. Mohamed Marie & Baolei Qi & Ali Meftah Gerged & Haitham Nobanee, 2024. "Exploring Environmental, Social and Governance research in the wake of COVID‐19: A bibliometric analysis of current trends and recommendations for future research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6131-6149, November.
    5. Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Noor Azlinna Azizan & Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran & Sujit K Sukumaran, 2019. "Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Elen Cristina Bravos Giupponi & Maximilian Espuny & Camila Fabrício Poltronieri & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2026. "From ESG to Sustainable Development: A Path Designed for the Triple Helix Spheres," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1622-1647, April.
    7. Jiang, Yahan & Wang, Cai & Li, Sha & Wan, Jing, 2022. "Do institutional investors' corporate site visits improve ESG performance? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Enilov, Martin & Delantar, Edna & Parhi, Mamata, 2026. "The predictive effects of Fintech-ESG dynamic interdependence: A global perspective on Cleantech energy transition risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Federica Ielasi & Paolo Ceccherini & Pietro Zito, 2020. "Integrating ESG Analysis into Smart Beta Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Raymond Kwong & Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Helen S. M. Wong, 2023. "Green FinTech Innovation as a Future Research Direction: A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance and FinTech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    11. Xiaoling Yu & Kaitian Xiao, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-40, December.
    12. Xinyu Wang & Siyu Shen & Jun Xie & Hidemichi Fujii & Alexander Ryota Keeley & Shunsuke Managi, 2026. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7037-7062, July.
    13. Alkan, Doga & Ayari, Rayan & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2026. "Green fees: Sustainability impacts on portfolio management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. Carlos Estevez‐Mendoza & Juan Infante, 2025. "Evolution and relevance of research on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1545-1566, March.
    15. Lingfu Kong & Minhas Akbar & Petra Poulova, 2023. "The Role of Environment, Social, and Governance Performance in Shaping Corporate Current and Future Value: The Case of Global Tech Leaders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Lee, Yehwan & Han, Seung Hun, 2025. "ESG news spillover and corporate investment efficiency," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Jancy Phore & Ashish Kumar & Bharti & Deepa & Suman Ahuja & Nupur Soti, 2026. "Mapping the Intellectual Landscape of ESG: A Bibliometric and Thematic Approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2998-3018, March.
    18. Wu, Liangpeng & Tang, Yujing & Meng, Lei & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhou, Dequn, 2025. "Navigating ESG rating divergence: Implications for labor investment efficiency and firm adaptation strategy," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Thi-Ngoc-Mai Le & Phuong-Linh Vu & Anh-Tuan Doan & Thi-Hong-Hanh Dao, 2026. "Improve or worsen: The impacts of corporate sustainability development on firm’s performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 498-531, February.
    20. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9379-:d:1777103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.