IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9146-d1772234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Institutional and Innovation Ecosystem in Moderating the Impact of Green Practices on Export Performance: Evidence from European Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Chatchai Khiewngamdee

    (Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chaing Mai 50202, Thailand)

  • Somsak Chanaim

    (International College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chaing Mai 50202, Thailand)

Abstract

As global merchandise exports reached $22 trillion in 2023 and environmental standards have become increasingly stringent, understanding how green practices influence export competitiveness has become critically important. Although existing research documents positive associations between environmental practices and trade outcomes, the conditions that enhance or constrain these relationships remain underexplored, particularly at the macro level across different export performance segments. Using panel data from 30 European countries for the period 2012–2022, this study examines how institutional and innovation ecosystem factors moderate the relationship between green practices and export performance. Employing panel quantile regression alongside conventional panel methods, we investigate whether regulatory quality, research and development expenditure, and financial market development influence the export benefits derived from ISO14001 certification and environmental patents. Our baseline findings reveal that both environmental management systems and green innovations show positive associations with exports, with ISO14001 certification demonstrating stronger effects in countries with lower export volumes. Notably, regulatory quality and financial market development significantly amplify the export benefits of environmental management systems. However, robustness checks employing instrumental variable estimation and System GMM to address potential endogeneity reveal that these direct effects weaken substantially when reverse causality is explicitly addressed, though point estimates remain consistently positive. These results suggest that while positive associations between environmental practices and export performance appear robust across multiple specifications, establishing definitive causal effects requires cautious interpretation and future quasi-experimental research. The findings highlight the importance of coordinated policy approaches integrating environmental, financial market, and regulatory dimensions, while underscoring that institutional moderators may provide more robust insights than direct effect estimates for understanding how environmental practices enhance competitiveness in international markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatchai Khiewngamdee & Somsak Chanaim, 2025. "The Role of Institutional and Innovation Ecosystem in Moderating the Impact of Green Practices on Export Performance: Evidence from European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9146-:d:1772234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9146/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9146/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    2. Ivan A. Canay, 2011. "A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14(3), pages 368-386, October.
    3. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    4. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    5. Bishwanath Goldar, 2023. "ICT Investment, Adoption of ISO 14000 Certification, and Export Performance in Indian Manufacturing Plants," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 21(3), pages 523-553, September.
    6. Luís Pacheco & Carla Lobo & Isabel Maldonado, 2022. "Do ISO Certifications Enhance Internationalization? The Case of Portuguese Industrial SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Costantini, Valeria & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2012. "On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 132-153.
    8. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    9. Jaffe, Adam B. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N., 2005. "A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 164-174, August.
    10. Shuai, Jing & Zhao, Yujia & Wang, Yilan & Cheng, Jinhua, 2022. "Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    11. He, Wenlong & Liu, Chong & Lu, Jiangyong & Cao, Jing, 2015. "Impacts of ISO 14001 adoption on firm performance: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 43-56.
    12. Hatice Ozer Balli & Bent Sørensen, 2013. "Interaction effects in econometrics," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 583-603, August.
    13. David Powell, 2022. "Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 2675-2691, November.
    14. Siedschlag, Iulia & Meneto, Stefano, 2020. "Green innovations and export performance," Papers WP674, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Juan Blyde, 2025. "The ISO 14001 Environmental Standard and Exports," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 115-128, March.
    16. Jiayue Liu & Jing Xie, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Export Competitiveness: An Empirical Study Based on China’s Manufacturing Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Jie Liu & Chunhui Yuan & Muhammad Hafeez & Xiaolong Li, 2020. "ISO 14001 certification in developing countries: motivations from trade and environment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(7), pages 1241-1265, June.
    18. Abdoul G. Sam & Danbee Song, 2022. "Corporate environmentalism and international trade: Evidence from industry‐level data," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1440-1455, September.
    19. Brambor, Thomas & Clark, William Roberts & Golder, Matt, 2006. "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 63-82, January.
    20. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    21. Chiara Lodi & Silvia Bertarelli, 2023. "Eco-innovation and exports in heterogeneous firms: pollution haven effect and Porter hypothesis as competing theories," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 923-952, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe & Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke & Chinedum Uzoma Nwajiuba & Ifeoma Quinette Anugwa & Obioma Uchenna Emenekwe, 2025. "Determinants of consumption-based and production-based carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10303-10339, May.
    2. Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Yoon, Seong-Min & Kang, Sang Hoon, 2019. "FDI, income, and environmental pollution in Latin America: Replication and extension using panel quantiles regression analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Marc Audi & Marc Poulin & Khalil Ahmad & Amjad Ali, 2025. "Modeling Disaggregate Globalization to Carbon Emissions in BRICS: A Panel Quantile Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Mohd Alsaleh & Xiaohui Wang & Zhang Nan, 2024. "Toward marine sustainability: Unveiling the effect of the fishery industry on blue carbon sequestration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 481-495, February.
    5. Khan, Zeeshan & Zhu, Xufeng & Chatti, Walid, 2025. "Environmental Poverty from the lens of sustainable development and financial inclusion: Evaluating the importance of energy productivity and clean energy electricity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    6. Behera, Deepak Kumar & Dash, Umakant, 2019. "Prioritization of government expenditure on health in India: A fiscal space perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Sinem Koçak & Özge Barış-Tüzemen, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 on foreign direct investment inflows in emerging economies: evidence from panel quantile regression," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Cao, Chunyan & Chen, Wei & Aslam, Misbah, 2023. "COP26 perspective of natural resources extraction: Oil and mineral resources perspective of developed economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Guang, Fengtao & He, Yongxiu & Wen, Le & Sharp, Basil, 2019. "Energy intensity and its differences across China’s regions: Combining econometric and decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 989-1000.
    10. Dagar, Vishal & Dagher, Leila & Rao, Amar & Doytch, Nadia & Kagzi, Muneza, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty: Global energy security with diversification," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 248-263.
    11. Muhammad Tariq Majeed & Maria Mazhar & Isma Samreen & Aisha Tauqir, 2022. "Economic complexities and environmental degradation: evidence from OECD countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5846-5866, April.
    12. Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Usman, Muhammad & Chukwuma Onwe, Joshua, 2023. "Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Su, Chi Wei & Yue, Peiwen & Hou, Xinmeng & Dördüncü, Hazar, 2023. "Sustainable development through digital innovation: A new era for natural resource extraction and trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    14. Muhammad Iatzaz Ul Hassan & Mengyun WU & Jie Lu & Jan Muhammad Sohu & Shoaib Ali & Hafiz Naveed Anjum & Muhammad Bilal, 2025. "Financial technology and banking performance in developing countries: evidence from an advanced quantile regression approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Ben-Salha Ousama & Zmami Mourad, 2020. "The impact of private capital flows on economic growth in the MENA region," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(3), pages 45-67, August.
    16. Isiaka Akande Raifu & Terver Theophilus Kumeka & Alarudeen Aminu, 2024. "Financial Development and Unemployment in MENA: Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Causality and Quantile via Moment Regression," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3512-3550, March.
    17. Audi, Marc & Ahmad, Khalil & Poulin, Marc & Ali, Amjad, 2025. "From Globalization to Innovation: Investigating the impact of R&D, Internet Penetration, and Economic Factors on Digitalization in BRICS," MPRA Paper 124396, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Mohd Alsaleh & A. S. Abdul‐Rahim & Ru Liu & Qingru Sun, 2024. "Nature of property rights and motivation for blue growth: An empirical evidence from the fisheries industry," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(1), pages 184-210, February.
    19. Kazi Musa & Marijn Janssen & Jamaliah Said & Nor Balkish Zakaria & Naila Erum, 2025. "The Impact of Public Debt and Quality of Governance on Economic Growth in High-Income Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2817-2843, March.
    20. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9146-:d:1772234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.