IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9080-d1770602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence in Tourism: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Siqi Wang

    (Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Qingjin Wang

    (Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Qian Cui

    (Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Tian Lan

    (Business School, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology becomes increasingly prevalent in the tourism sector, an in-depth exploration of its opportunities and potential risks for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is urgently needed. However, existing research falls short in constructing an integrated knowledge framework that systematically clarifies how AI can effectively advance sustainable tourism, leaving theoretical understanding and practical pathways relatively fragmented. To address this gap, this study employs a systematic literature review following the strict SPAR-4-SLR protocol and integrates a domain-based TCCM (i.e., theories, contexts, characteristics, and methods) analysis framework. A total of 177 core articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were rigorously analyzed. This study first examines publication trends, key journals, and the citation impact of AI in tourism. It then systematically synthesizes the theoretical foundations, research contexts, characteristics, and methodologies. Most importantly, this review delves into the antecedents, decision-making processes (including mediating and moderating variables), and outcomes of AI applications in the tourism industry. This study not only delineates a clear direction and agenda for future academic inquiry but also provides theoretical support and practical guidance for policymakers and tourism managers to design and implement AI-driven sustainable tourism strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqi Wang & Qingjin Wang & Qian Cui & Tian Lan, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in Tourism: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9080-:d:1770602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9080/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9080/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    4. Shuhao Li & Rui Han & Tianyu Fu & Mimi Chen & Yuhang Zhang, 2025. "Tourists’ behavioural intentions to use ChatGPT for tour route planning: an extended TAM model including rational and emotional factors," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(13), pages 2119-2135, July.
    5. Jochen Wirtz & Valarie Zeithaml, 2018. "Cost-effective service excellence," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 59-80, January.
    6. Wang, Siqi & Lim, Weng Marc & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean, 2025. "Working with robots: Trends and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Sonia Dasí-Rodríguez, 2020. "The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1023-1042, September.
    8. Jeff Christensen & Jared M. Hansen & Paul Wilson, 2025. "Understanding the role and impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) hallucination within consumers’ tourism decision-making processes," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 545-560, February.
    9. C. Michael Hall & Chris Cooper, 2025. "Making tourism smart in the age of artificial intelligence," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-5, January.
    10. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satyam Pathak & Amandeep Kaur, 2025. "Mapping the intersection of digitalization and social entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review using the TCCM framework," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Jammes, Julie & Folcher, Pauline & N'Goala, Gilles, 2025. "Social acceptability of innovation: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    4. Fatima Zahra Barrane & Gahima Egide Karuranga & Diane Poulin, 2018. "Technology Adoption and Diffusion: A New Application of the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Greve, Goetz & Meyer, Frederike, 2020. "Sales- und Service-Bots im Vertrieb - Chance oder Risiko für Unternehmen?," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 37(5), pages 10-17.
    7. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    9. Chia-Chien Hsu & Brian Sandford & Chia-Ju Ling & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Can the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Help Explain Subjective Well-Being in Senior Citizens due to Gateball Participation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    11. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2023. "Risk-Taking, Financial Knowledge, and Risky Investment Intention: Expanding Theory of Planned Behavior Using a Moderating-Mediating Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Peter Bou Saba & Régis Meissonier, 2016. "Conflict contagion effects from previous IT projects: action research during preliminary phases of a DST implementation project [Effets de contagion de conflits de projets TI antérieurs:Une recherc," Post-Print hal-02161336, HAL.
    13. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    14. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    15. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    16. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    17. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    18. Chua Chang Jin & Lim Chee Seong & Aye Aye Khin, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Consumer Acceptance towards Fintech Products and Services in Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 59-65, January.
    19. Triadi Agung Sudarto & Dodik Juliardi, 2022. "The effect of perceptions on tax evasion and tax sanction on ethical behaviour of accounting student compliance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 206-216, December.
    20. Gupta, Somya & Hassen, Majdi & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2024. "Cognitive, affective, and normative factors affecting digital insurance adoption among persons with disabilities: A two-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9080-:d:1770602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.