IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8930-d1766886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Collaboration for Effective ESG Implementation for Forests: Applying the Resource-Based View and Delphi

Author

Listed:
  • Donghee Kim

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, College of Life Science, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Jaehyun Kim

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, College of Life Science, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

In socio-ecological systems, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives play a critical role in enhancing forest multifunctionality, including climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. However, corporate integration and disclosure related to forests remain limited. Effective and sustainable ESG implementation for forests requires close collaboration among corporations, governments and NGOs. This study applied the resource-based view to identify the resources and capabilities of corporations, governments, and NGOs. The Delphi method was used to capture multi-sector expert opinions on the roles of governments and NGOs in supporting corporate forest-related ESG activities in the Republic of Korea. Through a three-round Delphi survey, consensus was achieved on 11 government roles and 14 NGO roles. The most frequently agreed-upon roles were related to technological and informational resources. Although these roles were linked to similar resource categories, government roles primarily encompassed macro-level and scientific functions, whereas NGO roles emphasized field-specific information and practical capabilities. To enhance the effectiveness of corporate ESG implementation through such collaboration, stakeholders must further develop both the quantity and quality of their resources and capabilities. Furthermore, an institutional structure that ensures balanced stakeholder participation is essential to minimize potential value conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghee Kim & Jaehyun Kim, 2025. "Stakeholder Collaboration for Effective ESG Implementation for Forests: Applying the Resource-Based View and Delphi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8930-:d:1766886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong-Hwan Lee & Jin-Hyung Cho, 2021. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Tax Avoidance—Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. G. Abord-Hugon Nonet & T. Gössling & R. Tulder & J. M. Bryson, 2022. "Multi-stakeholder Engagement for the Sustainable Development Goals: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 945-957, November.
    3. Jonathan P. Doh & Terrence R. Guay, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional‐Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 47-73, January.
    4. Kulwant Singh & Will Mitchell, 2005. "Growth dynamics: the bidirectional relationship between interfirm collaboration and business sales in entrant and incumbent alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 497-521, June.
    5. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Daeheon Choi & Chune Young Chung & Jason Young, 2019. "An Economic Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Georg Weinhofer & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2010. "Mitigating climate change – how do corporate strategies differ?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 77-89, February.
    8. Evangeline O. Elijido-Ten & Peter Clarkson, 2019. "Going Beyond Climate Change Risk Management: Insights from the World’s Largest Most Sustainable Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 1067-1089, July.
    9. Noémi Nemes & Stephen J. Scanlan & Pete Smith & Tone Smith & Melissa Aronczyk & Stephanie Hill & Simon L. Lewis & A. Wren Montgomery & Francesco N. Tubiello & Doreen Stabinsky, 2022. "An Integrated Framework to Assess Greenwashing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Sustainability and stakeholder theory: A processual perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(13), pages 61-77.
    11. Colin Eden & Chris Huxham, 2001. "The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi‐Organizational Collaborative Groups," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 373-391, May.
    12. Wullianallur Raghupathi & Dominik Molitor & Viju Raghupathi & Aditya Saharia, 2023. "Identifying Key Issues in Climate Change Litigation: A Machine Learning Text Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Ralph Adler & Mansi Mansi & Rakesh Pandey, 2018. "Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top Fortune Global companies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 787-825, March.
    14. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    15. Abeer Mohamed Hassan & Lee Roberts & Jill Atkins, 2020. "Exploring factors relating to extinction disclosures: What motivates companies to report on biodiversity and species protection?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1419-1436, March.
    16. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    17. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2016-2490 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    20. Rowe, Gene & Wright, George, 1999. "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 353-375, October.
    21. Joseph Bakos & Michele Siu & Adalberto Orengo & Narges Kasiri, 2020. "An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium‐sized enterprises: Patterns and trends," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1285-1296, March.
    22. Lars H. Gulbrandsen, 2004. "Overlapping Public and Private Governance: Can Forest Certification Fill the Gaps in the Global Forest Regime?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 4(2), pages 75-99, May.
    23. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiberio Daddi & Niccolò Maria Todaro & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Marco Frey, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 456-474, May.
    2. Riikka Tapaninaho & Anna Heikkinen, 2022. "Value creation in circular economy business for sustainability: A stakeholder relationship perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2728-2740, September.
    3. Simon Norris & Julia Hagenbeck & Stefan Schaltegger, 2021. "Linking sustainable business models and supply chains — Toward an integrated value creation framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3960-3974, December.
    4. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2022. "Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Gueler, Melike Sarah & Schneider, Sabrina, 2021. "The resource-based view in business ecosystems: A perspective on the determinants of a valuable resource and capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-169.
    6. Maurizio Zollo & Mario Minoja & Vittorio Coda, 2018. "Toward an integrated theory of strategy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1753-1778, June.
    7. Cabral, Natália Gomes Cavalcante & Gohr, Cláudia Fabiana, 2023. "Sustainable value creation in sharing economy: Conceptual framework proposition and application in Brazilian offline communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    8. Adewole Olukorede, 2025. "Stakeholder engagement and participation in environmental contexts, social responsibility and society based on a study conducted in Rome, Italy," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-45, December.
    9. David Talbot & Olivier Boiral, 2021. "Public organizations and biodiversity disclosure: Saving face to meet a legal obligation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2571-2586, July.
    10. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    13. Marvin B. Lieberman & Natarajan Balasubramanian & Roberto Garcia‐Castro, 2018. "Toward a dynamic notion of value creation and appropriation in firms: The concept and measurement of economic gain," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1546-1572, June.
    14. Gastón Reyes, 2023. "The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 37-55, November.
    15. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    16. Xiaoping Zhao & Audrey Murrell, 2022. "Does A Virtuous Circle Really Exist? Revisiting the Causal Linkage Between CSP and CFP," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 173-192, April.
    17. Beck, Donizete & Ferasso, Marcos, 2023. "How can Stakeholder Capitalism contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? A Cross-network Literature Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    18. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Sophie Bacq & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2022. "Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 29-60, January.
    20. Afrifa, Godfred Adjapong & Tingbani, Ishmael & Yamoah, Fred & Appiah, Gloria, 2020. "Innovation input, governance and climate change: Evidence from emerging countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8930-:d:1766886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.