IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v38y2001i3p373-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi‐Organizational Collaborative Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Eden
  • Chris Huxham

Abstract

The negotiation and agreement of goals for collaborations between public and non‐profit organizations is argued to be a complex and painful process. Thus, the research described in this paper used action research to explore some of the critical behaviours in such groups. Based on the two units of analysis of ‘goal ownership’ and ‘episodes in negotiation’, a categorization of types of multi‐organizational group negotiation behaviour is developed. The categories are intended to be of practical use to those seeking to ensure the success of a collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Eden & Chris Huxham, 2001. "The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi‐Organizational Collaborative Groups," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 373-391, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:38:y:2001:i:3:p:373-391
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia Tello-Rozas & Marlei Pozzebon & Chantale Mailhot, 2015. "Uncovering Micro-Practices and Pathways of Engagement That Scale Up Social-Driven Collaborations: A Practice View of Power," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1064-1096, December.
    2. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    3. Babiak, Kathy M., 2009. "Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Marie, Tsanga Tabi, 2016. "Public values as essential criteria for public entrepreneurship: Water management in France," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 162-169.
    5. L A Franco, 2007. "Assessing the impact of problem structuring methods in multi-organizational settings: an empirical investigation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(6), pages 760-768, June.
    6. Fran Ackermann & Colin Eden, 2011. "Negotiation in Strategy Making Teams: Group Support Systems and the Process of Cognitive Change," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 293-314, May.
    7. Özgü Karakulak & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2024. "Social-Symbolic Work in the Construction of Social Problems: Constructing Gender Inequality in Turkish Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 461-486, July.
    8. Colin Eden & Fran Ackermann, 2014. "‘Joined-Up’ Policy-Making: Group Decision and Negotiation Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1385-1401, November.
    9. Alberto Franco, L., 2009. "Problem structuring methods as intervention tools: Reflections from their use with multi-organisational teams," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 193-203, February.
    10. Lauri Paavola, 2021. "The role of (dynamic) capabilities in the transformation of a multi-organizational setting," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 715-748, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:38:y:2001:i:3:p:373-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.