IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8412-d1753306.html

Environmental Safety and Self-Perceived Quality of Life and Health: The Example of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Murawska

    (Department of Economics and Marketing, Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Patrycja Sieg

    (Department of Management of Organizational Innovation, Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Szymon Stereńczak

    (Department of Corporate Finance, Institute of Accounting and Finance Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Increasing environmental threats and accelerating effects of climate change serve to reinforce the perception of environmental safety not only as an ecological concern but also as a social and economic one. The extant research suggests that environmental factors have a significant impact on health and quality of life. However, the literature still lacks comprehensive analysis integrating objective environmental indicators with subjective measures of quality of life in a comparative and dynamic framework, particularly in European Union (EU) countries. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the environmental safety within European Union countries and its impact on self-perceived quality of life and health. The analysis integrates the multidimensional environmental indicators with subjective assessments of quality of life. To this end, the TOPSIS method is employed to construct a synthetic index for environmental safety ( ES_Score ). Moreover, pooled cross-sectional time-series regressions are utilised for formal analyses. The study encompasses data from 27 EU countries from 2018 to 2023. The findings of the study suggest that environmental safety exhibits considerable variation among EU countries yet remains relatively stable over time. This underscores the enduring nature of environmental advantages and deficits. Countries with superior environmental safety are also those which have been shown to exhibit a higher quality of life and better health. Proactive environmental investments and activities aimed at sustainable growth have the capacity to improve the quality of life of the population. However, some factors, such as high air emission intensity or excessive water abstraction may be challenging. The findings of this study demonstrate a significant relationship between environmental protection initiatives and social prosperity within European nations, thus offering valuable insights that can inform the development of public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Murawska & Patrycja Sieg & Szymon Stereńczak, 2025. "Environmental Safety and Self-Perceived Quality of Life and Health: The Example of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-32, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8412-:d:1753306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krekel, Christian & Kolbe, Jens & Wüstemann, Henry, 2016. "The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 117-127.
    2. Dimitrios Kantemnidis & Iosif Botetzagias, 2023. "Understanding the Environmental Security Perceptions of the European Union’s Security Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    4. Ferreira, Susana & Akay, Alpaslan & Brereton, Finbarr & Cuñado, Juncal & Martinsson, Peter & Moro, Mirko & Ningal, Tine F., 2013. "Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Helmi Räisänen & Emma Hakala & Jussi T. Eronen & Janne I. Hukkinen & Mikko J. Virtanen, 2021. "Comprehensive Security: The Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Environmental Threats in Security Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 91-101.
    6. Sølvi Helseth & Nina Misvær, 2010. "Adolescents’ perceptions of quality of life: what it is and what matters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1454-1461, May.
    7. W Neil Adger & Ricardo Safra de Campos & Tasneem Siddiqui & Maria Franco Gavonel & Lucy Szaboova & Mahmudol Hassan Rocky & Mohammad Rashed Alam Bhuiyan & Tamim Billah, 2021. "Human security of urban migrant populations affected by length of residence and environmental hazards," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(1), pages 50-66, January.
    8. Matthias Braubach & Myriam Tobollik & Pierpaolo Mudu & Rosemary Hiscock & Dimitris Chapizanis & Denis A. Sarigiannis & Menno Keuken & Laura Perez & Marco Martuzzi, 2015. "Development of a Quantitative Methodology to Assess the Impacts of Urban Transport Interventions and Related Noise on Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Isabel Gallego-Alvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa, 2014. "Environmental Performance in Countries Worldwide: Determinant Factors and Multivariate Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Carmelo Reverte, 2022. "The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross‐country empirical study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1882-1899, December.
    11. Katherine Ka Pik Chang & Frances Kam Yuet Wong & Ka Long Chan & Fiona Wong & Hung Chak Ho & Man Sing Wong & Yuen Shan Ho & John Wai Man Yuen & Judy Yuen-man Siu & Lin Yang, 2020. "The Impact of the Environment on the Quality of Life and the Mediating Effects of Sleep and Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Helmi Räisänen & Emma Hakala & Jussi T. Eronen & Janne I. Hukkinen & Mikko J. Virtanen, 2021. "Comprehensive Security: The Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Environmental Threats in Security Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 91-101.
    13. Breusch, T S & Pagan, A R, 1979. "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1287-1294, September.
    14. Filiz Çelik & Emmanuel Babatunde Jaiyeoba, 2023. "The Contributions of the Green Areas in Residence Immediate Environment on Quality of Urban Life," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    2. Michele Fratianni & Francesco Marchionne, 2011. "The Limits to Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Michael O'Connor Keefe & David Gallagher, 2014. "Does the effect of revealed private information on initial public offering (IPO) first trading day return differ by IPO market heat?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(3), pages 921-964, September.
    4. Guilhem Bascle, 2008. "Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research," Post-Print hal-00576795, HAL.
    5. Eduardo Correia & Rodrigo Calili & José Francisco Pessanha & Maria Fatima Almeida, 2023. "Definition of Regulatory Targets for Electricity Non-Technical Losses: Proposition of an Automatic Model-Selection Technique for Panel Data Regressions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Christopher F Baum & Mark E. Schaffer & Steven Stillman, 2003. "Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, March.
    7. Ayadi, Mohamed A. & Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Mohebshahedin, Mahmood, 2018. "Impact of sponsorship on fixed-income fund performance," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 121-137.
    8. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & de Sá Lopes, Leonardo Batista, 2024. "Is environmental regulation keeping e-waste under control? Evidence from e-waste exports in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Nathalie Picard & Constantinos Antoniou, 2014. "Econometric Methods For Land Use Microsimulation," Working Papers hal-01092031, HAL.
    10. Clewlow, Regina R. & Sussman, Joseph M. & Balakrishnan, Hamsa, 2014. "The impact of high-speed rail and low-cost carriers on European air passenger traffic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 136-143.
    11. Krekel, Christian & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Does the presence of wind turbines have negative externalities for people in their surroundings? Evidence from well-being data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 221-238.
    12. Zerrahn, Alexander & Krekel, Christian, 2015. "Sowing the Wind and Reaping the Whirlwind? The Effect of Wind Turbines on Residential Well-Being," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112956, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Olivier Damette & Philippe Delacote, 2009. "The environmental resource curse hypothesis: the forest case," Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2009-04, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA.
    14. Ebrahim Abbas Abdullah Abbas Amer & Zhang Xiuwu & Ebrahim Mohammed Ali Meyad & Mohammed Muneer Alareqi & SAMEER. M. H. BATHER & Amr Abdelwahed, 2025. "Nexus between renewable-disaggregated non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in GCC countries: a Cobb-Douglas production function analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D. & Karemera, David, 1992. "Determinants of Red Meat Trade Flows," Agricultural Economics Reports 23448, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    16. Naghsh Nejad, Maryam, 2013. "Institutionalized Inequality and Brain Drain: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Women's Rights on the Gender Gap in High-Skilled Migration," IZA Discussion Papers 7864, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Ming-Chieh Wang & Tai-Feng Chen, 2016. "Does the spillover of China's economic growth exist? Evidence from emerging markets," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 992-1009, October.
    18. Krekel, Christian & Rechlitz, Julia & Rode, Johannes & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2020. "Quantifying the Externalities of Renewable Energy Plants Using Wellbeing Data: The Case of Biogas," IZA Discussion Papers 13959, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Mohamed Soufeljil & Asma Sghaier & Zouhayer Mighri & Hanène Kheireddine, 2017. "The financial structure of the Tunisian listed businesses: an application on panel data," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Trujillo, Lourdes & Martin, Noelia & Estache, Antonio & Campos, Javier, 2002. "Macroeconomics effects of private sector participation in Latin America's infrastructure," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2906, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8412-:d:1753306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.