IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8412-d1753306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Safety and Self-Perceived Quality of Life and Health: The Example of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Murawska

    (Department of Economics and Marketing, Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Patrycja Sieg

    (Department of Management of Organizational Innovation, Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Szymon Stereńczak

    (Department of Corporate Finance, Institute of Accounting and Finance Management, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Increasing environmental threats and accelerating effects of climate change serve to reinforce the perception of environmental safety not only as an ecological concern but also as a social and economic one. The extant research suggests that environmental factors have a significant impact on health and quality of life. However, the literature still lacks comprehensive analysis integrating objective environmental indicators with subjective measures of quality of life in a comparative and dynamic framework, particularly in European Union (EU) countries. The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the environmental safety within European Union countries and its impact on self-perceived quality of life and health. The analysis integrates the multidimensional environmental indicators with subjective assessments of quality of life. To this end, the TOPSIS method is employed to construct a synthetic index for environmental safety ( ES_Score ). Moreover, pooled cross-sectional time-series regressions are utilised for formal analyses. The study encompasses data from 27 EU countries from 2018 to 2023. The findings of the study suggest that environmental safety exhibits considerable variation among EU countries yet remains relatively stable over time. This underscores the enduring nature of environmental advantages and deficits. Countries with superior environmental safety are also those which have been shown to exhibit a higher quality of life and better health. Proactive environmental investments and activities aimed at sustainable growth have the capacity to improve the quality of life of the population. However, some factors, such as high air emission intensity or excessive water abstraction may be challenging. The findings of this study demonstrate a significant relationship between environmental protection initiatives and social prosperity within European nations, thus offering valuable insights that can inform the development of public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Murawska & Patrycja Sieg & Szymon Stereńczak, 2025. "Environmental Safety and Self-Perceived Quality of Life and Health: The Example of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-32, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8412-:d:1753306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    2. Isabel Gallego-Alvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa, 2014. "Environmental Performance in Countries Worldwide: Determinant Factors and Multivariate Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Carmelo Reverte, 2022. "The importance of institutional differences among countries in SDGs achievement: A cross‐country empirical study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1882-1899, December.
    4. Katherine Ka Pik Chang & Frances Kam Yuet Wong & Ka Long Chan & Fiona Wong & Hung Chak Ho & Man Sing Wong & Yuen Shan Ho & John Wai Man Yuen & Judy Yuen-man Siu & Lin Yang, 2020. "The Impact of the Environment on the Quality of Life and the Mediating Effects of Sleep and Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Helmi Räisänen & Emma Hakala & Jussi T. Eronen & Janne I. Hukkinen & Mikko J. Virtanen, 2021. "Comprehensive Security: The Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Environmental Threats in Security Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 91-101.
    6. Breusch, T S & Pagan, A R, 1979. "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1287-1294, September.
    7. Filiz Çelik & Emmanuel Babatunde Jaiyeoba, 2023. "The Contributions of the Green Areas in Residence Immediate Environment on Quality of Urban Life," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    8. Krekel, Christian & Kolbe, Jens & Wüstemann, Henry, 2016. "The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 117-127.
    9. Dimitrios Kantemnidis & Iosif Botetzagias, 2023. "Understanding the Environmental Security Perceptions of the European Union’s Security Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Ferreira, Susana & Akay, Alpaslan & Brereton, Finbarr & Cuñado, Juncal & Martinsson, Peter & Moro, Mirko & Ningal, Tine F., 2013. "Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Helmi Räisänen & Emma Hakala & Jussi T. Eronen & Janne I. Hukkinen & Mikko J. Virtanen, 2021. "Comprehensive Security: The Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Environmental Threats in Security Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 91-101.
    12. Sølvi Helseth & Nina Misvær, 2010. "Adolescents’ perceptions of quality of life: what it is and what matters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1454-1461, May.
    13. W Neil Adger & Ricardo Safra de Campos & Tasneem Siddiqui & Maria Franco Gavonel & Lucy Szaboova & Mahmudol Hassan Rocky & Mohammad Rashed Alam Bhuiyan & Tamim Billah, 2021. "Human security of urban migrant populations affected by length of residence and environmental hazards," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(1), pages 50-66, January.
    14. Matthias Braubach & Myriam Tobollik & Pierpaolo Mudu & Rosemary Hiscock & Dimitris Chapizanis & Denis A. Sarigiannis & Menno Keuken & Laura Perez & Marco Martuzzi, 2015. "Development of a Quantitative Methodology to Assess the Impacts of Urban Transport Interventions and Related Noise on Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayadi, Mohamed A. & Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Mohebshahedin, Mahmood, 2018. "Impact of sponsorship on fixed-income fund performance," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 121-137.
    2. Neves, Sónia Almeida & Marques, António Cardoso & de Sá Lopes, Leonardo Batista, 2024. "Is environmental regulation keeping e-waste under control? Evidence from e-waste exports in the European Union," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Clewlow, Regina R. & Sussman, Joseph M. & Balakrishnan, Hamsa, 2014. "The impact of high-speed rail and low-cost carriers on European air passenger traffic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 136-143.
    4. Krekel, Christian & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Does the presence of wind turbines have negative externalities for people in their surroundings? Evidence from well-being data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 221-238.
    5. Zerrahn, Alexander & Krekel, Christian, 2015. "Sowing the Wind and Reaping the Whirlwind? The Effect of Wind Turbines on Residential Well-Being," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112956, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Olivier Damette & Philippe Delacote, 2009. "The environmental resource curse hypothesis: the forest case," Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2009-04, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA.
    7. Ebrahim Abbas Abdullah Abbas Amer & Zhang Xiuwu & Ebrahim Mohammed Ali Meyad & Mohammed Muneer Alareqi & SAMEER. M. H. BATHER & Amr Abdelwahed, 2025. "Nexus between renewable-disaggregated non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in GCC countries: a Cobb-Douglas production function analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D. & Karemera, David, 1992. "Determinants of Red Meat Trade Flows," Agricultural Economics Reports 23448, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    9. Naghsh Nejad, Maryam, 2013. "Institutionalized Inequality and Brain Drain: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Women's Rights on the Gender Gap in High-Skilled Migration," IZA Discussion Papers 7864, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Ming-Chieh Wang & Tai-Feng Chen, 2016. "Does the spillover of China's economic growth exist? Evidence from emerging markets," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 992-1009, October.
    11. Krekel, Christian & Rechlitz, Julia & Rode, Johannes & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2020. "Quantifying the Externalities of Renewable Energy Plants Using Wellbeing Data: The Case of Biogas," IZA Discussion Papers 13959, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Kubal, Jan & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2022. "Exploring the relationship between Bitcoin price and network’s hashrate within endogenous system," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Miomir Jovanović & Ljiljana Kašćelan & Aleksandra Despotović & Vladimir Kašćelan, 2015. "The Impact of Agro-Economic Factors on GHG Emissions: Evidence from European Developing and Advanced Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Imran Haider & Cuixia Li & Trinh Thi Viet Ha, 2025. "Climate Change’s Influence on Dairy Farming in Punjab, Pakistan: Effects on Milk Production, Farmers’ Views, and Future Adaptation Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Yap, Ying Kai & Shafik, Salwa, 2014. "Can the Chinese banking system continue to grow without sacrificing loan quality?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 315-330.
    16. Francesco Marchionne & Alberto Zazzaro, 2018. "Risk and competitiveness in the Italian banking sector," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 271-280.
    17. Christine Bertram & Jan Goebel & Christian Krekel & Katrin Rehdanz, 2022. "Urban Land Use Fragmentation and Human Well-Being," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(2), pages 399-420.
    18. Misund, Bård, 2015. "Reserves Replacement and Oil and Gas Company Shareholder returns," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2015/11, University of Stavanger.
    19. Ibishova, Banovsha & Misund, Bård & Tveterås, Ragnar, 2024. "Driving green: Financial benefits of carbon emission reduction in companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    20. Alemayehu Geda & Atnafu Meskel, 2008. "China and India's Growth Surge: Is it a curse or blessing for Africa? The Case of Manufactured Exports," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 20(2), pages 247-272.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8412-:d:1753306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.