IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8117-d1745716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Production Tax Policy on Water Resource and Economy: A Case Study of Wenling City

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Wang

    (Wenling Agriculture, Rural and Water Resources Bureau, Wenling 317500, China)

  • Xichen Lin

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR), Beijing 100038, China)

  • Hongzhen Ni

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR), Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and industrialization have intensified the contradiction between water scarcity and economic growth. Achieving synergy between economic development and water conservation through taxation and subsidy policies has emerged as a critical research focus. This study develops an extended Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model incorporating a water resource module to evaluate the impacts of production tax and subsidy policies in Wenling City, Zhejiang Province, China, a typical water-scarce city. By integrating a nested Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production function for various water sources, the model captures the interactions between water supply and industrial output. Six policy scenarios of taxations and subsidies are designed. The impacts on macroeconomic aggregates, industrial output, and water usage are simulated. Results indicate that standalone taxation policies (Water Conservation Taxation Policy A1/Industrial Transformation Taxation Policy B1) reduce water usage by 3.35–3.80% but suppress Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth by 0.37–0.76%. Among combined policies, the Water Conservation Combined Policy A3 achieves the optimal synergy between water conservation and economic growth, increasing real GDP by 1.00% while reducing water usage by 4.97%. This study reveals that taxation curbs the expansion of water-intensive industries, whereas subsidies redirect production factors toward water-efficient industries. Combining these policies effectively balances water conservation and economic development objectives. This study demonstrates how differentiated tax instruments drive water conservation through industrial transformation, providing a quantitative framework for production tax policy formulation in water-scarce regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Wang & Xichen Lin & Hongzhen Ni, 2025. "Impact of Production Tax Policy on Water Resource and Economy: A Case Study of Wenling City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8117-:d:1745716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duarte, Rosa & Sanchez-Choliz, Julio & Bielsa, Jorge, 2002. "Water use in the Spanish economy: an input-output approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 71-85, November.
    2. Jinying Ma & Xi Zhang & Feng Tao & Fuzheng Luo, 2016. "Tax Arrangement and Regional Industrial Restructuring: Evidence from Panel Data in China," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-13, September.
    3. Jieting Yin & Qingyou Yan & Kaijie Lei & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Economic and Efficiency Analysis of China Electricity Market Reform Using Computable General Equilibrium Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Xiaoyan Gao & Yuhao Zhang, 2023. "Feasibility Study of China’s Carbon Tax System under the Carbon Neutrality Target—Based on the CGE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Mahmood, Arshad & Marpaung, Charles O.P., 2014. "Carbon pricing and energy efficiency improvement -- why to miss the interaction for developing economies? An illustrative CGE based application to the Pakistan case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 87-103.
    6. Zhao, Jing & Ni, Hongzhen & Peng, Xiujian & Li, Jifeng & Chen, Genfa & Liu, Jinhua, 2016. "Impact of water price reform on water conservation and economic growth in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 90-103.
    7. Wanjuan Zhang & Yang Yu & Xueyu Zhou & Shuai Yang & Chuan Li, 2018. "Evaluating Water Consumption Based on Water Hierarchy Structure for Sustainable Development Using Grey Relational Analysis: Case Study in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Macdonald, Kevin & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2021. "Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing," GLO Discussion Paper Series 955, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    2. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    3. Edgar G. Hertwich & Maximilian Koslowski & Kajwan Rasul, 2024. "Linking hypothetical extraction, the accumulation of production factors, and the addition of value," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 736-750, August.
    4. Li, Wei & Jia, Zhijie, 2016. "The impact of emission trading scheme and the ratio of free quota: A dynamic recursive CGE model in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Muhammad Jawad Sajid & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, 2021. "The Impact of Direct and Indirect COVID-19 Related Demand Shocks on Sectoral CO 2 Emissions: Evidence from Major Asia Pacific Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Li, Wei & Jia, Zhijie & Zhang, Hongzhi, 2017. "The impact of electric vehicles and CCS in the context of emission trading scheme in China: A CGE-based analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 800-816.
    7. Filipović, Sanja & Verbič, Miroslav & Radovanović, Mirjana, 2015. "Determinants of energy intensity in the European Union: A panel data analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 547-555.
    8. Fitsum Semere Weldegiorgis & Evelyn Dietsche & Shabbir Ahmad, 2023. "Inter-Sectoral Economic Linkages in the Mining Industries of Botswana and Tanzania: Analysis Using Partial Hypothetical Extraction Method," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Amine Chekireb & Julio Goncalves & Hubert Stahn & Agnes Tomini, 2021. "Private exploitation of the North-Western Sahara Aquifer System," Working Papers halshs-03457972, HAL.
    10. Yuxiang Zhang & Deqing Tan & Zhi Liu, 2019. "Leasing or Selling? Durable Goods Manufacturer Marketing Model Selection under a Mixed Carbon Trading-and-Tax Policy Scenario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Matías Piaggio & Vicent Alcántara Escolano & Emilio Padilla, 2012. "Economic structure and key sectors analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguay," Working Papers wpdea1204, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    12. Mubako, Stanley & Lahiri, Sajal & Lant, Christopher, 2013. "Input–output analysis of virtual water transfers: Case study of California and Illinois," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 230-238.
    13. Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan, 2015. "Independent power (or pollution) producers? Electricity reforms and IPPs in Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 240-251.
    14. Zhaocheng Li & Yu Song, 2022. "Energy Consumption Linkages of the Chinese Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Beltrán, Allan & Alatorre, José Eduardo & Ferrer, Jimy & Galindo, Luis Miguel, 2017. "Efectos potenciales de un impuesto al carbono sobre el producto interno bruto en los países de América Latina: estimaciones preliminares e hipotéticas a partir de un metaanálisis y una función de tran," Documentos de Proyectos 41867, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. Lenzen, Manfred & Bhaduri, Anik & Moran, Daniel & Kanemoto, Keiichiro & Bekchanov, Maksud & Geschke, Arne & Foran, Barney, 2012. "The role of scarcity in global virtual water flows," Discussion Papers 133478, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    17. Foran, Barney & Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Bilek, Marcela, 2005. "Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 143-157, January.
    18. Haoyang Li & Feng Song & Fang Xia, 2024. "Speeding Up Renewable Energy Integration with Invisible Hands: Ancillary Service Market and the COVID-19 Natural Experiment," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(5), pages 1-31, September.
    19. Zeyang Bian & Dan Liu, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on Types, Methods and Different Regions Related to Water–Energy–Food Nexus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Tian, Jing & Andraded, Celio & Lumbreras, Julio & Guan, Dabo & Wang, Fangzhi & Liao, Hua, 2018. "Integrating Sustainability Into City-level CO2 Accounting: Social Consumption Pattern and Income Distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-16.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8117-:d:1745716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.