IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7772-d1737082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Multidimensional Assessment of Progress Towards Sustainability at the Macro Scale: The Cases of 12 OECD Countries, China, and Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Stanislav Edward Shmelev

    (Environment Europe Foundation, Fluwelen Burgwal 58, The Hague Humanity Hub, 2511CJ The Hague, The Netherlands)

Abstract

An assessment of sustainability at the macro level is carried out for 12 leading OECD economies, plus China and Brazil, over the period of 1960–2015 in a comparative dynamic fashion under varying policy priorities: economic, social, environmental, and equal importance. Overall, Sweden, Switzerland, and Norway are found to be outperforming most other countries based on the basket of 16 different sustainability indicators consistently over time. While there are underlying causes of such performance expressed in policies of innovation, decarbonisation, and social cohesion, addressing economic, environmental, and social dimensions, there are some soft factors traditionally lying outside economic or policy domains. Such factors represent the power of institutions, the level of psychological well-being, and societal values, which tend to be statistically different in Sweden, Switzerland, and Norway, as opposed to other countries in the sample. The reasons for the changes in sustainability performance among countries under different policy priorities are discussed at length, with special attention paid to an economically, environmentally, and socially weighted sustainability index of progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislav Edward Shmelev, 2025. "Comparative Multidimensional Assessment of Progress Towards Sustainability at the Macro Scale: The Cases of 12 OECD Countries, China, and Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7772-:d:1737082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7772-:d:1737082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.