IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7464-d1727036.html

Measurement of the Modernization of Rural Governance Capacity: A Systematic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jingchen You

    (School of Statistics and Data Science, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, China
    School of Statistics and Data Science, Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, Xi’an 710100, China)

  • Zhiqiang Pang

    (School of Statistics and Data Science, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, China)

  • Xijuan Niu

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China)

  • Yize Zhang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

The modernization of rural governance capacity (MRGC) is an important factor in enhancing the effectiveness of governance and promoting sustainable rural development. By interpreting the connotation of the MRGC, this study analyzes the dual structure of the rural organization system and its internal correlation based on the principle of system theory. The evaluation framework of the MRGC is constructed from the two dimensions of subject governance capacity (SGC) and inter-subject interaction force (IIF). Furthermore, an empirical study utilizing survey data from 15 towns, 248 villages, and 2579 villagers in Kang County, Gansu Province, China is conducted. The results show that Kang County’s overall MRGC, along with sub-dimensional SGC and IIF, remains at a moderate level. SGC manifests as balanced high performance and differentiated low performance. IIF variation is primarily driven by capability volatility. Regional analysis indicates that resource-rich areas exhibit higher SGC but carry greater systemic imbalance risks. Combined weights effectively rectify single-method biases in measurement design.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingchen You & Zhiqiang Pang & Xijuan Niu & Yize Zhang, 2025. "Measurement of the Modernization of Rural Governance Capacity: A Systematic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-33, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7464-:d:1727036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zaitul Zaitul & Desi Ilona & Neva Novianti, 2023. "Good Governance in Rural Local Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Jianwen Shi & Xiuyun Yang, 2022. "Sustainable Development Levels and Influence Factors in Rural China Based on Rural Revitalization Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yu Peng & Xiaobing Peng & Xu Li & Mingyue Lu & Mingze Yin, 2023. "Effectiveness in Rural Governance: Influencing Factors and Driving Pathways—Based on 20 Typical Cases of Rural Governance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Nasrun Annahar & Ida Widianingsih & Entang Adhy Muhtar & Caroline Paskarina, 2023. "The Road to Inclusive Decentralized Village Governance in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Vaidehi Pathak & Sameer Deshkar, 2023. "Transitions towards Sustainable and Resilient Rural Areas in Revitalising India: A Framework for Localising SDGs at Gram Panchayat Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Carolyn L. Evans, 2003. "The Economic Significance of National Border Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1291-1312, September.
    7. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yajun Ma & Zhengyong Yu & Wei Liu & Qiang Ren, 2025. "Exploring the coupling coordination relationship and obstacle factors of rural revitalization, new-type urbanization, and digital economy in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Xiaowei Shi & Peitian Su & Yanle Xia & Heng Zhang & Yuzhuo Shen & Bonoua Faye & Yujing Wang & Lei Liu & Ruhao Xue, 2025. "Assessing Rural Habitat Suitability in Anhui Province: A Socio-Economic and Environmental Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Xiaqun Liu & Xiaoyue Qiu & Yaming Zhuang, 2025. "Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Rural Revitalization in China: A Perspective on Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Min Zhao & Qi Chen & Jun Zhang & Qianwen Xu & Peng Li, 2025. "Spatial Characteristics and Factors Influencing the Rural Development Level of Chinese Counties on the Basis of Point Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Besedes, Tibor & Prusa, Thomas J., 2006. "Product differentiation and duration of US import trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 339-358, December.
    6. Tejada, O. & Álvarez-Mozos, M., 2018. "Graphs and (levels of) cooperation in games: Two ways how to allocate the surplus," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 114-122.
    7. James Harrigan, 2001. "Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?," NBER Working Papers 8675, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca & Josè A. Martinez-Serrano, 2011. "Is There A Continental Bias In Trade?," ERSA conference papers ersa10p792, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A., 2007. "Comparative advantage, demand for external finance, and financial development," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 796-834, December.
    10. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2004. "Trade Costs," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(3), pages 691-751, September.
    11. Wolf, Nikolaus, 2009. "Was Germany Ever United? Evidence from Intra- and International Trade, 1885–1933," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(3), pages 846-881, September.
    12. Mayra Vega-Campa & Francisco J André & Mario Soliño, 2023. "Socioeconomic driving forces behind air polluting emissions in Mexico," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Festus Ebo Turkson, 2011. "Logistics and Bilateral Exports in Developing Countries: A Multiplicative Form Estimation of the Logistics Augmented Gravity Equation," Discussion Papers 11/06, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    14. Rebecca Hellerstein, 2005. "A Decomposition of the Sources of Incomplete Cross-Border Transmission," 2005 Meeting Papers 805, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    15. Koenig, Pamina & Poncet, Sandra, 2019. "Social responsibility scandals and trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Salvador Gil‐Pareja & Rafael Llorca‐Vivero & José A. Martínez‐Serrano & Josep Oliver‐Alonso, 2005. "The Border Effect in Spain," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1617-1631, November.
    17. Hansen Tandra & I Gusti Ayu Putu Mahendri & Sujianto Sujianto & Bahtiar Rifai & Zamroni Salim & Helena da Silva & Yulia Pujiharti, 2025. "The Impact of Trade with Border Effect on GDP per Capita: Global Evidence," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    19. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Raddatz, Claudio, 2016. "Comparative advantage, international trade, and fertility," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-66.
    20. Enrique Martínez García, 2008. "Globalization and monetary policy: an introduction," Globalization Institute Working Papers 11, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7464-:d:1727036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.