IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7275-d1722689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Environmental Performance of Agricultural Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Liangcan Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Xiang Li

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Zhanjie Wang

    (School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

Facing the pressure of green transformation, studying the relationship between government subsidies and the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises has significant theoretical value and practical significance for achieving sustainable agricultural development. Based on the micro data of 283 A-share listed agricultural enterprises in China from 2013 to 2023, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of government subsidies on the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises and its mechanism. The results show that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between government subsidies and the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises, that is, when the government subsidies are within a certain scale, increasing government subsidies will have a positive impact on the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises. When the government subsidy reaches a certain scale, increasing the government subsidy will have a negative impact on the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises. External media attention (EMA) and internal control level (IC) play mediating roles in the impact of government subsidies on the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises. Heterogeneity analysis showed that for different types of subsidies, R&D subsidies and environmental protection subsidies had an inverted U-shaped impact on the environmental performance of agricultural enterprises. This study provides useful implications for improving methods of issuing government subsidies and enhancing the driving force of agricultural enterprises to carry out sustainable development actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangcan Liu & Xiang Li & Zhanjie Wang, 2025. "The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Environmental Performance of Agricultural Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7275-:d:1722689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo & Francesco Testa & Maria Rosa De Giacomo, 2019. "The influence of managerial satisfaction on corporate environmental performance and reputation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 15-24, January.
    2. Rehman, Shafique Ur & Kraus, Sascha & Shah, Syed Asim & Khanin, Dmitry & Mahto, Raj V., 2021. "Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Yu, Feifei & Wang, Liting & Li, Xiaotong, 2020. "The effects of government subsidies on new energy vehicle enterprises: The moderating role of intelligent transformation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Sun, Xianming, 2023. "The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Ren, Shenggang & Sun, Helin & Zhang, Tao, 2021. "Do environmental subsidies spur environmental innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Li, Shuangyan, 2022. "Natural extreme events, government subsidies and corporate environment responsibility: Evidence from China's energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Amama Shaukat & Yan Qiu & Grzegorz Trojanowski, 2016. "Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 569-585, May.
    8. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    9. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    10. Lijuan Tao & Xiaoju Wei & Wenjing Wang, 2023. "Does Enterprise Internal Control Improve Environmental Performance—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Wenbo Jiang & Francesco Rosati & Huaqi Chai & Taiwen Feng, 2020. "Market orientation practices enhancing corporate environmental performance via knowledge creation: Does environmental management system implementation matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1899-1924, July.
    12. Jun Xie & Wataru Nozawa & Michiyuki Yagi & Hidemichi Fujii & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 286-300, February.
    13. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Wen Chen & Changyi Zhu & Qi Cheung & Siying Wu & Jun Zhang & Jia Cao, 2024. "How does digitization enable green innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3832-3854, July.
    15. Yasir Shahab & Collins G. Ntim & Yugang Chen & Farid Ullah & Hai‐Xia Li & Zhiwei Ye, 2020. "Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Ahn, Joon Mo & Lee, Weonvin & Mortara, Letizia, 2020. "Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. William Dilla & Diane Janvrin & Jon Perkins & Robyn Raschke, 2019. "Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 476-497, June.
    18. William Dilla & Diane Janvrin & Jon Perkins & Robyn Raschke, 2019. "Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 476-497, June.
    19. Alessandra Catozzella & Marco Vivarelli, 2016. "The possible adverse impact of innovation subsidies: some evidence from Italy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 351-368, June.
    20. Linda Kusumaning Wedari & Amir Moradi‐Motlagh & Christine Jubb, 2023. "The moderating effect of innovation on the relationship between environmental and financial performance: Evidence from high emitters in Australia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 654-672, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Ruilei & Wei, Jiuchang, 2023. "Does CEOs’ green experience affect environmental corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 205-231.
    2. Peng, Shengnan & Liu, Chan & Wang, Ze & Ye, Zihan & Sun, Xialing & Tan, Zhanglu, 2024. "The impact of the carbon reduction policy effectiveness on energy companies' ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    3. Li, Shuangyan, 2022. "Natural extreme events, government subsidies and corporate environment responsibility: Evidence from China's energy sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Johnny Jermias, 2022. "The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2992-3013, November.
    5. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    6. Andreas Wagner & Denise Fischer‐Kreer, 2024. "The role of CEO regulatory focus in increasing or reducing corporate carbon emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1051-1065, February.
    7. Douglas A. Adu & Antoinette Flynn & Colette Grey, 2022. "Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability‐based compensation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 698-736, March.
    8. Zheng, Suyi & Wen, Jiandong, 2024. "Green public procurement and corporate environmental performance: An empirical analysis based on data from green procurement contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    9. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Alona Bilokha & Mingying Cheng & Mengchuan Fu & Iftekhar Hasan, 2025. "Understanding CSR champions: a machine learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(1), pages 761-774, April.
    11. Rachana Manoj Lunawat & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2025. "Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors into the Investment Returns of American Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Ying Lu & Tingting Liu & Junrui Zhang & Hussain Muhammad Jameel, 2025. "When Confidence Backfires: The Impact of Managerial Overconfidence on Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Li, Junjun & Wu, Tong & Hu, Boqiang & Pan, Dongliang & Zhou, Yaqiong, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Shu, Ying & Zhuang, Xiaobin & Xu, Guanghua & Zhang, Shanfei & Ying, Rui, 2024. "Peer effects, environmental regulation and environmental financial integration—Empirical evidence from listed companies in heavily polluting industries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1446-1458.
    16. Valeria D’Amato & Rita D’Ecclesia & Susanna Levantesi, 2022. "ESG score prediction through random forest algorithm," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 347-373, June.
    17. David Teh & Tehmina Khan, 2024. "Sustainability-Focused Accounting, Management, and Governance Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-46, November.
    18. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shireenjit K. Johl, 2021. "Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2922-2936, November.
    19. Keigo Fujikura & Akitsu Oe, 2023. "The Influence of Firms’ Pragmatic Legitimacy on Investors’ Perceptions of Their Environmental Protection Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Ajab Khan & H. Kent Baker, 2022. "How board diversity and ownership structure shape sustainable corporate performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3751-3770, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7275-:d:1722689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.