IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7224-d1721373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing Strategy for Sustainable Recycling of Power Batteries Considering Recycling Competition Under the Reward–Penalty Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Hairui Wei

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Ziming Qi

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Abstract

With the large-scale power batteries approaching their retirement phase, efforts are being made to advance the recycling and cascade utilization of power batteries for electric vehicles (EVs). This paper constructs a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) of power batteries led by the battery manufacturer (BM) and composed of the electric vehicle manufacturer (EVM) and third-party recycler (TPR). The study investigates the optimal pricing strategies of this CLSC with the consideration of recycling competition under the government’s reward–penalty mechanism. This paper establishes five recycling modes, namely independent recycling and cooperative recycling, under dual-channel recycling, and further discusses the effects of the government reward–penalty mechanism and recycling competition on the recycling rate, profits, and recycling pricing of the CLSC in each recycling mode. The following conclusions are found: (1) An increase in the reward–penalty intensity will increase the recycling rate, sales price of EVs, wholesale price, transfer price, recycling price, and the profit of each recycler in the CLSC. (2) An increase in the recycling competition will result in the reduction of the profit of each enterprise, and will also lead to the reduction of the recycling rate. (3) Cooperation between enterprises can inhibit the recycling volume of other enterprises to a certain extent. The cooperation between the EVM and BM can increase the recycling volume and the sales volume of EVs. (4) The leadership of the BM in the supply chain is embodied in the recycling and profit. For other members of the supply chain, it is very important to strive for cooperation with the leaders in the supply chain. These research conclusions can provide theoretical support for optimizing the power battery recycling system, formulating relevant policies, and improving the efficiency of resource recycling, thereby promoting the sustainable development of the new energy industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Hairui Wei & Ziming Qi, 2025. "Pricing Strategy for Sustainable Recycling of Power Batteries Considering Recycling Competition Under the Reward–Penalty Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-33, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7224-:d:1721373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jiumei & Zhang, Wen & Gong, Bengang & Zhang, Xiaoqi & Li, Hongping, 2022. "Optimal policy for the recycling of electric vehicle retired power batteries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Qiyao Liu & Xiaodong Zhu, 2024. "Incentive strategies for retired power battery closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 19013-19050, July.
    3. Gu, Huaying & Liu, Zhixue & Qing, Qiankai, 2017. "Optimal electric vehicle production strategy under subsidy and battery recycling," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 579-589.
    4. Wu, Chuantao & Zhou, Dezhi & Lin, Xiangning & Sui, Quan & Wei, Fanrong & Li, Zhengtian, 2022. "A novel energy cooperation framework for multi-island microgrids based on marine mobile energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Kai Liu & Chuanxu Wang, 2024. "Production and recycling of new energy vehicle power batteries under channel encroachment and government subsidy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1313-1339, January.
    6. Penkovskii, Andrey & Stennikov, Valery & Mednikova, Ekaterina & Postnikov, Ivan, 2018. "Search for a market equilibrium of Cournot-Nash in the competitive heat market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 193-201.
    7. Fang, Lei & Li, Yanlin & Govindan, Kannan, 2024. "Entry mode selection for a new entrant of the electric vehicle automaker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 270-280.
    8. Zhou, Wenhui & Zheng, Yanfang & Huang, Weixiang, 2017. "Competitive advantage of qualified WEEE recyclers through EPR legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 641-655.
    9. Wang, Wenbin & Zhang, Yu & Zhang, Kai & Bai, Tuo & Shang, Jennifer, 2015. "Reward–penalty mechanism for closed-loop supply chains under responsibility-sharing and different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 178-190.
    10. Zhang, Qi & Tang, Yanyan & Bunn, Derek & Li, Hailong & Li, Yaoming, 2021. "Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    11. Xuan Zhao & Benhong Peng & Chaoyu Zheng & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Closed-loop supply chain pricing strategy for electric vehicle batteries recycling in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7725-7752, June.
    12. Hongzhen Song & Jiantong Zhang & Junchang Li, 2022. "The impacts of subsidy strategies and recycling modes on the closed‐loop supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 4106-4123, December.
    13. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    14. Wang, Nengmin & He, Qidong & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 246-258.
    15. Wang, Lei & Wang, Xiang & Yang, Wenxian, 2020. "Optimal design of electric vehicle battery recycling network – From the perspective of electric vehicle manufacturers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qi & Tang, Yanyan & Bunn, Derek & Li, Hailong & Li, Yaoming, 2021. "Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    2. Luo, Jiaqi & Yang, Ying & Jiang, Yan, 2025. "Assessing the antecedents, processes, and consequences of sustainable electric vehicle battery recycling: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Aishwarya, V.M. & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Singh, Tej & Singh, Vedant, 2025. "Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges, innovations, and global policy impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Feng, Jianghong & Ning, Yu & Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Guo & Xiu Xu, Su, 2024. "ChatGPT-enabled two-stage auctions for electric vehicle battery recycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Wang, Yitong & Fan, Ruguo & Chen, Rongkai & Xie, Xiao & Ke, Can, 2025. "Exploring the coevolution dynamics of residents and recyclers in electric vehicle battery recycling decisions on the two-layer heterogeneous complex networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    6. Xia, Xiaoning & Li, Pengwei & Cheng, Yang, 2024. "Economic and environmental evaluation of different collection models for spent power batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Lan Jiang, 2023. "Managing mass customization products with modular design for recycling in a closed‐loop supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4589-4607, December.
    8. Kai Liu & Chuanxu Wang, 2024. "Production and recycling of new energy vehicle power batteries under channel encroachment and government subsidy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1313-1339, January.
    9. Fengmin Yao & Yufei Wang & Yingluo Yan & Shan Liu, 2024. "Manufacturer's online recycling channel intrusion strategies considering digital technology enabling and government subsidies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), pages 1043-1066, March.
    10. Wu, Wenqi & Li, Ming & Yang, Yishu & Huang, Beijia & Wang, Shuo & Huang, George Q., 2025. "Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 92-103.
    11. Shan Liu & Caiquan Duan & Jinyou Qiao & Yan Sun, 2025. "Manufacturer's cooperative recycling strategies considering the negative externality of unrecycled products: Non‐cooperative, fund‐cooperative, or labour‐cooperative," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 201-221, January.
    12. Peng Xing & Junzhu Yao, 2022. "Power Battery Echelon Utilization and Recycling Strategy for New Energy Vehicles Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Tang, Yanyan & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yaoming & Li, Hailong & Pan, Xunzhang & Mclellan, Benjamin, 2019. "The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Wang, Junbin & Zhang, Ting & Fan, Xiaojun, 2020. "Reverse channel design with a dominant retailer and upstream competition in emerging markets: Retailer- or manufacturer- collection?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Zhu, He & Hu, Jiayao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Towards a circular supply chain for retired electric vehicle batteries: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    16. Chao Zuo & Xuqiang Yan & Ziyi Chen & Wenbo Wei & Meina Gao & Yuting Ling & Fenping Zhu & Bei Liu & Hongwei Zhou & Dong Xu & Mengjun Zhang, 2025. "Factors influencing residents’ inclination towards engaging in the recycling of electric vehicle batteries," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Shiqi Xu & Hui Liu & Guangye Xu, 2021. "Selection of Recycling Channels and Product Eco-Design with Take-Back Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Guohao Li & Tao Wang, 2022. "Long-Term Leases vs. One-Off Purchases: Game Analysis on Battery Swapping Mode Considering Cascade Utilization and Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    20. Menglin Zhan & Yan Chen, 2022. "Vehicle Company’s Decision-Making to Process Waste Batteries: A Game Research under the Influence of Different Government Subsidy Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7224-:d:1721373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.