IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7039-d1716522.html

ESG Reporting in the Digital Era: Unveiling Public Sentiment and Engagement on YouTube

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Erokhin

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2361 Laxenburg, Austria)

Abstract

This study examines how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting is communicated and perceived on YouTube. A dataset of 553 relevant videos and 5060 user comments was extracted on 2 April 2025 ranging between 2014 and 2025, and sentiment, topic, and stance analyses were applied to both transcripts and comments. The majority of video content strongly endorsed ESG reporting, emphasizing themes such as transparency, regulatory compliance, and financial performance. In contrast, viewer comments revealed diverse stances, including skepticism about methodological inconsistencies, accusations of greenwashing, and concerns over politicization. Notably, statistical analysis showed minimal correlation between video sentiment and audience sentiment, suggesting that user perceptions are shaped by factors beyond the tone of the videos themselves. These findings underscore the need for more rigorous ESG frameworks, enhanced standardization, and proactive stakeholder engagement strategies. The study highlights the value of online platforms for capturing stakeholder feedback in real time, offering practical insights for organizations and policymakers seeking to strengthen ESG disclosure and communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Erokhin, 2025. "ESG Reporting in the Digital Era: Unveiling Public Sentiment and Engagement on YouTube," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7039-:d:1716522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Arianna Lazzini, 2020. "Greenwashing and environmental communication: Effects on stakeholders' perceptions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 407-421, February.
    2. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    3. Michela Arnaboldi & Cristiano Busco & Suresh Cuganesan, 2017. "Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 762-776, May.
    4. Shauhrat S. Chopra & Sachini Supunsala Senadheera & Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake & Piumi Amasha Withana & Rajeev Chib & Jay Hyuk Rhee & Yong Sik Ok, 2024. "Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2017-2880 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin Marius & Deaconu Elena-Mădălina & Trică Carmen Lenuța & Ignat Raluca, 2025. "A Pillar-Based and KPI-Oriented Framework in Business Reporting for Sustainable Development," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 5087-5097.
    2. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    4. Priyanka Aggarwal & Archana Singh & Deepali Malhotra, 2025. "ESG Implementation in Indian NIFTY 500 Companies: A Comprehensive Multi-case Analysis of Strategy, Implementation, and Value Creation," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 14(3), pages 243-260, December.
    5. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    7. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    8. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Jiang, Yongni & Yang, Pianpian & Zhang, Lu & Wang, Maotian, 2025. "Impact of green innovation openness and green innovation radicalness on firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    10. Galletta, Simona & Goodell, John W. & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2025. "The impact of environmental disclosure and controversies on bank value," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 134.
    11. Domenica Lavorato & Palmira Piedepalumbo, 2023. "How Smart Technologies Affect the Decision-Making and Control System of Food and Beverage Companies—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    13. R. M. Ammar Zahid & Umer Sahil Maqsood & Shoaib Irshad & Muhammad Kaleem Khan, 2025. "The role of women on board in combatting greenwashing: A new perspective on environmental performance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 121-136, January.
    14. Torsten Ehlers & Ulrike Elsenhuber & Kumar Jegarasasingam & Eric Jondeau, 2022. "Deconstructing ESG Scores: How to Invest with Your own Criteria," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-23, Swiss Finance Institute.
    15. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    16. Wei Li & Weining Li & Veikko Seppänen & Timo Koivumäki, 2022. "How and when does perceived greenwashing affect employees' job performance? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1722-1735, September.
    17. Angelidis, Timotheos & Michairinas, Athanasios & Sakkas, Athanasios, 2024. "World ESG performance and economic activity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Antonios Persakis & Theodoros Nikolopoulos & Ioannis C. Negkakis & Athanasios Pavlopoulos, 2025. "Greenwashing in marketing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(4), pages 957-992, December.
    19. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Sanctuary, Mark & Lavenius, Axel & Parlato, Giorgio & Plue, Jan & Crona, Beatrice, 2024. "A study of green European equity fund portfolio allocations," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 499, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7039-:d:1716522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.